• Blog Stats

    • 253,821 Visitors
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,074 other followers

  • Google Translator


  • FaceBook

  • Islamic Terror Attacks

  • Meta

  • iPaper Embed

  • Calendar

    August 2020
    M T W T F S S
  • Authors Of Blog

  • Monthly Archives

Sant No Shu Vaank Tema ,



‘ Uddhava Gita ’

Some Times : Santosh Bhatt

‘Uddhava Gita’

Why did Krishna not save the Pandavas when they played dice with Duryadhana & Shakuni?

Wonderful explanation by Lord Shree Krishna himself:

From his childhood, Uddhava had been with Shree Krishna, charioting him and serving him in many ways. He never asked for any wish or boon from Sri Krishna.

When Krishna was at the verge of completing His Avatar, he called Uddhava and said,‘Dear Uddhava, in this avatar of mine, many people have asked and received boons from me;

but you never asked me anything.

Why don’t you ask something now?

I will give you.

Let me complete this avatar with the satisfaction of doing something good for you also’.

Even though Uddhava did not ask anything for himself, he had been observing Krishna from his childhood, he had always wondered about the apparent disconnect between Shree Krishna’s teachings and actions, and wanted to understand the reasons for the same.

He asked Shree Krishna, ‘Lord, you taught us to live in one way, but you lived in a different way.

In the drama of Mahabharat I did not understand many things, the role played by you and your actions. I am curious to understand the reasons for your actions. Would you fulfil my desire to know?

Shree Krishna said, ‘Uddhava, what I told Arjuna during the war of Kurukshetra was ” Holy Shreemad Bhagavad Gita “.

Today, my responses to you would be known as

‘Uddhava Gita’.

That is why I gave this opportunity to you.

Please ask without hesitation.

’ Uddhava starts asking – ‘Krishna, first tell me who is a real friend ?’

Lord Shree Krishna said , ‘The real friend is one who comes to the help of his friend in need even without being called’.

Uddhava: ‘Krishna, you were a dear friend of the Pandavas. They trusted you fully as Apadhbhandava (protector from all difficulties).

Krishna, you not only knows what is happening, but you know what is going to happen.

You are a great Gyani. Just now you gave the definition of a true friend, then why did you not act as per that definition.

Why did you not stop Dharmaraj (Yudhishtra) from playing the gambling game?

And if you did not stop him then why did you not turn the luck in favour of Dharmaraj, by which you would have ensured that dharma wins.

You did not do that also.

You could have at least saved Dharmaraj by stopping the game after he lost his wealth, country and himself.

You could have released him from the punishment for gambling.

Or, you could have entered the hall when he started betting his brothers. You did not do that either.

At least when Duryodhana tempted Dharmaraj by offering to return everything lost if he betted Draupadi (who always brought good fortune to Pandavas), you could have intervened and with your divine power you could have made the dices roll in a way that is favorable to Dharmaraj.

Instead, you intervened only when Draupadi almost lost her modesty and now you claim that you gave clothes and saved Draupadi’s modesty.

How can you even claim this – after her being dragged into the hall by a man and disrobed in front of so many people, what modesty is left for a woman?

What have you saved?

Only when you help a person at the time of crisis, can you be called ‘Apadhbandhava’.

If you did not help in the time of crisis, what is the use ?

Is it Dharma?’

As Uddhava asked these questions, tears started rolling from his eyes.

These are not the questions of Uddhava alone.

All of us who have read Mahabharata have these questions.

On behalf of us, Uddhava had already asked Shree Krishna.

Bhagavan Krishna laughed. ‘Dear Uddhava, the law of this world is: ‘only the one who has Viveka (intelligence through discrimination), wins’.

While Duryodhana had viveka, Dharmaraj lacked it. That is why Dharmaraj lost’.

Uddhava was lost and confused.

Shree Krishna continued ‘While Duryodhana had lots all of money and wealth to gamble, he did not know how to play the game of dice.

That is why he used his Uncle Shakuni to play the game while he betted.

That is viveka.

Dharmaraj also could have thought similarly and offered that I, being his cousin, would play on his behalf.

If Shakuni and I had played the game of dice, who do you think would have won?

Can he roll the numbers I am calling or would I roll the numbers he is asking. ?

I can forgive the fact that he forgot to include me in the game.

But, without viveka, he did another blunder.

He prayed that I should not come to the hall as he did not want me to know that through ill-fate he was compelled to play this game.

He tied me with his prayers and did not allow me to get into the hall;

I was just outside the hall waiting for someone to call me through their prayers.

Even when Bheema, Arjuna, Nakula and Sahadeva were lost, they were only cursing Duryodhana and brooding over their fate; they forgot to call me.

Even Draupadi did not call me when Dusshasan held her hair and dragged her to fulfil his brother’s order.

She was also arguing in the hall, based on her own abilities.

She never called me.

When Dusshasan started disrobing her, then good sense prevailed and she gave up depending on her own strength, and started shouting

‘Hari, Hari, Abhayam Krishna, Abhayam’ and shouted for me and my help.

Only then I got an opportunity to save her modesty.

I reached as soon as I was called.

I saved her modesty.

What is my mistake in this situation.

‘Wonderful explanation, Kanha, I am impressed. However, I am not deceived.

Can I ask you another question’, says Uddhava.

Shree Krishna gives him the permission to proceed.

‘Does it mean that you will come only when you are called! l

Will you not come on your own to help people in crisis, to establish justice?’,

Asked Uddhava.

Krishna smiles. ‘Uddhava, in this life everyone’s life proceeds based on their own karma.

I don’t run it;

I don’t interfere in it.

I am only a ‘witness’.

I stand close to you and keep observing whatever is happening.

This is God’s Dharma’

‘Wow, very good Krishna. In that case, you will stand close to us, observe all our evil acts; as we keep committing more and more sins, you will keep watching us.

You want us to commit more blunders, accumulate sins and suffer’, says Uddhava.

Shree Krishna says. ’Uddhava, please realise the deeper meaning of your statements.

When you understand & realise that I am standing as witness next to you, how can you do anything wrong or bad ?

You definitely cannot do anything bad.

You forget this and think that you can do things without my knowledge, that is when you get into trouble.

Dharmaraj’s ignorance was that he thought he can play the game of gambling without my knowledge.

If Dharmaraj had realized that I am always present with everyone in the form of ‘Sakshi’ (witness), then wouldn’t the game have finished differently?’

Uddhava was spellbound and got overwhelmed by Bhakti.(Devotion )

He said, ‘What a deep philosophy.

What a great truth!

Even praying and doing pooja to God and calling Him for help are nothing but our feeling / belief. When we start believing that nothing moves without Him, how can we not feel his presence as Witness?

How can we forget this and act?

Throughout Holy Shrimad Bhagavad Gita, this is the philosophy Shree Krishna imparted to Arjuna.

He was the charioteer as well as guide for Arjuna, but he did not fight on his own.’

Realize that Ultimate Sakshi/ Witnesser within & without you! And Merge in that God-Consciousness! Discover Thy Higher Self- The Pure Loveful & Blissful Supreme Consciousness! – Tat Tvam Asi! 🙏🏼

Geert Wilders Nails It.

"This clown said:" I wanted to inspire Muslim women to challenge themselves … (but) I didn't want to compromise my values." …..

If this hypocrite is really wanted to inspire Muslim women to challenge themselves, she would incite them to challenge female servitude in muslim communities. If she was really honest she would inspire women to get rid of the barbaric practices of Female Genital mutilation. She would help them defying forced marriages, polygamy, child marriages, forced hijab.

If she was really sincere she would help Muslim women to denounce honour killings, and the the tyranny of Sharia. She would help them liberated from forced hijab wearing, and to be second class and submissive sex in her communities, rather than promoting proudly, helped by the western useful idiots, the same oppressive practices , the symbol of women oppression and the sharia behind this Hijab….

But since most Muslims are myopic, and woman like this clown is destructively brainwashed, think herself liberated by her slavery, emancipated by her servitude and become another propaganda tool in the cycle of oppression of women in Islam, and in imposing Sharia gradually into the west and all the infiltration in its institutions ." Geert Wilders supporters

A 232 year history of our fight against Islam & why it is no longer taught in our public schools…


For those who care enough about our future, take the time to READ! OR……. continue sticking your head up your butt.

We have home grown terrorist and the war of the centuries which we have forgotten or never enlightened.

A 232 year history of our fight against Islam & why it is no longer taught in our public schools…

When Thomas Jefferson saw there was no negotiating with Muslims, he formed what is now the Marines (sea going soldiers). These Marines were attached to U. S. Merchant vessels. When the Muslims attacked U.S. merchant vessels they were repulsed by armed soldiers, but there is more.The Marines followed the Muslims back to their villages and killed every man, woman, and child in the village.It didn't take long for the Muslims to leave U.S. Merchant vessels alone.

English and French merchant vessels started running up our flag when entering the Mediterranean to secure safe travel. Why the Marine hymn contains the verse, "To the Shores of Tripoli ".

This is very interesting and a must read piece of our history. It points out where we may be heading.

Most Americans are unaware of the fact that over two hundred years ago the United States had declared war on Islam, and Thomas Jefferson led the charge! At the height of the 18th century, Muslim pirates (the "Barbary Pirates") were the terror of the Mediterranean and a large area of the North Atlantic. They attacked every ship in sight, and held the crews for exorbitant ransoms. Those taken hostage were subjected to barbaric treatment and wrote heart-breaking letters home, begging their governments and families to pay whatever their Mohammedan captors demanded.

These extortionists of the high seas represented the North African Islamic nations of Tripoli, Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers – collectively referred to as the Barbary Coast – and presented a dangerous and unprovoked threat to the new American Republic.

Before the Revolutionary War, U.S. merchant ships had been under the protection of Great Britain. When the U.S. declared its independence and entered into war, the ships of the United States were protected by France. However, once the war was won, America had to protect its own fleets. Thus, the birth of the U.S. Navy.

Beginning in 1784, 17 years before he would become president, Thomas Jefferson became America's Minister to France. That same year, the U.S. Congress sought to appease its Muslim adversaries by following in the footsteps of European nations who paid bribes to the Barbary States rather than engaging them in war.

In July of 1785, Algerian pirates captured American ships, and the Dye of Algiers demanded an unheard-of ransom of $60,000. It was a plain and simple case of extortion, and Thomas Jefferson was vehemently opposed to any further payments.

Instead, he proposed to Congress the formation of a coalition of allied nations who together could force the Islamic states into peace. A disinterested Congress decided to pay the ransom.

In 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli's ambassador to Great Britain to ask by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved American citizens, and why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.

The two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam "was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran that all nations who would not acknowledge their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise."

Despite this stunning admission of premeditated violence on non-Muslim nations, as well as the objections of many notable American leaders, including George Washington, who warned that caving in was both wrong and would only further embolden the enemy.

For the following fifteen years, the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages.The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to over 20 percent of the United States government annual revenues in 1800.

Jefferson was disgusted. Shortly after his being sworn in as the third President of the United States in 1801, the Pasha of Tripoli sent him a note demanding the immediate payment of $225,000 plus $25,000 a year for every year forthcoming.

That changed everything.

Jefferson let the Pasha know, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his demand. The Pasha responded by cutting down the flagpole at the American consulate and declared war on the United States.Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers immediately followed suit.

Jefferson, until now, had been against America raising a naval force for anything beyond coastal defense, but, having watched his nation be cowed by Islamic thuggery for long enough, decided that it was finally time to meet force with force.

He dispatched a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean and taught the Muslim nations of the Barbary Coast a lesson he hoped they would never forget.

Congress authorized Jefferson to empower U.S. ships to seize all vessels and goods of the Pasha of Tripoli and to "cause to be done all other acts of precaution or hostility as the state of war would justify".

When Algiers and Tunis, who were both accustomed to American cowardice and acquiescence, saw the newly independent United States had both the will and the right to strike back, they quickly abandoned their allegiance to Tripoli.

The war with Tripoli lasted for four more years, and raged up again in 1815. The bravery of the U.S. Marine Corps in these wars led to the line "to the shores of Tripoli" in the Marine Hymn, and they would forever be known as "leathernecks" for the leather collars of their uniforms, designed to prevent their heads from being cut off by the Muslim scimitars when boarding enemy ships.

Islam, and what its Barbary followers justified doing in the name of their prophet and their god, disturbed Jefferson quite deeply. America had a tradition of religious tolerance. In fact Jefferson, himself, had co-authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, but fundamentalist Islam was like no other religion the world had ever seen. A religion based on supremacy, whose holy book not only condoned but mandated violence against unbelievers, was unacceptable to him.

His greatest fear was that someday this brand of Islam would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States.

This should concern every American, that Muslims have brought about women-only classes and swimming times in America at taxpayer-funded universities and public pools; that Christians, Jews, and Hindus have been banned from serving on juries where Muslim defendants are being judged; Piggy banks and Porky Pig tissue dispensers have been banned from workplaces because they offend Islamist sensibilities; ice cream has been discontinued at certain Burger King locations because the picture on the wrapper looks similar to the Arabic script for Allah; public schools are pulling pork from their menus; on and on and on and on…

It's death by a thousand cuts, or inch-by-inch as some refer to it, and most Americans have no idea that this battle is being waged every day across America. By not fighting back, by allowing groups to obfuscate what is really happening, and not insisting that the Islamists adapt to our culture, the United States is cutting its own throat with a politically correct knife, and helping to further the Islamists' agenda.

Sadly, it appears that today America's leaders would rather be politically correct than victorious!


Please share!!!!

Hindu are in hopeless situation.

Some Times By : Sam Hindu 

Hindu are in hopeless situation.

Half the population would be shouting “terror has no religion”. Rest would be busy finding Jugaad for their own families. Most would be blaming Bhagya for the massive screw-up. Some would say: God is testing us.

Few would be fighting the menace and would face more trouble from escapist Indian population.

Moral of story – If after 1300 years of terror rule, two major parts of country partitioned, several holocausts of kill and rape that exceed even Hitler’s genocide of Jews, (most recent being just 70 years ago), regular terror attacks, Kashmir nonsense, we refuse to see the obvious, even God cannot help us.

We are a bunch of coward escapists who are scared to call spade a spade. We just wait for some Pratap or Shivaji to take huge risks to fight for right. Once they die, we hail them as hero and start business around it. But till they live, we are the ones who make their lives hell.

We refuse to learn from history, experts in blaming everything to a weird Bhagya theory, and are very productive in giving birth to traitors like Barkhas and Rajdeeps.

Unless we reform ourselves urgently, we are in hopeless situation.

Excellent collection and nice blog. I enjoyed it. Keep it up a good work.

” Sant ” Santosh Bhatt


Greatest loosers will be the preachers.

Some Times By : SAM Hindu

When people start thinking critically about religions the religions will have less and less control over their thinking. In this feat the greatest losers will be the preachers.

I think so too. It’s a matter of them making a living, But in this day and age of the readily accessible information the cat is out of the bag.

In this age people have started seeing the enormous amount of impact which religion has entwined into a cesspool of beliefs which are demeaning and thoroughly obnoxious , maybe islamophobia is driving them to accept the harsh realities of religious intolerance praticised by the mullahs. It’s not a matter of their living ,but it’s their own religious identities which is inherent in many moderates too .

*Have you ever read these Western philosophers*


1. *Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910)*

“Hindus and Hindutva will one day rule the world, because this is a combination of knowledge and wisdom”.

2. *Herbert Wells (1846 – 1946):*

“Until the effectiveness of Hindutva is restored, how many generations will suffer atrocities and life will be cut off, then one day the entire world will be attracted to it, on that day there will be Dilshad and on that day the world will be inhabited.

3. *Albert Einstein (1879-1955):*

“I understand that through his intelligence and awareness he did that which the Jews could not do. In Hinduism it is the power that can lead to peace.”

4. *Huston Smith (1919):*

“The faith which is upon us and this is better than us in the world, then it is Hindutva. If we open our hearts and minds for it, then it will be good for us”.

5. *Michael Nostradamus (1503 – 1566):*

“Hindutva will become the ruler religion in Europe, but the famous city of Europe will become the Hindu capital”.

6. *Bertrand Russell (1872 – 1970):*

“I read Hinduism and realized that it is for the religion of all the world and all mankind.” Hindutva will spread throughout Europe and in Europe, big thinkers of Hinduism will emerge. One day it will come that Hindus will be the real stimulus of the world. “.

7. *Gosta Lobon (1841 – 1931):*

“Hindus speak of peace and reconciliation. I invite Christians to appreciate the faith of reform.”

8. *Bernard Shaw (1856 – 1950):*

“The entire world will accept Hindu religion one day and if it can not even accept the real name it will accept it by name only.” West will accept Hindutva one day and Hindu will be the religion of those who have studied in the world “.

9. *Johann Geith (1749 – 1832):*

“We all have to accept Hinduism now or later and this is the real religion.”

इस्लामी जन्नत की हकीकत, Islamic Heaven Exposed 

इस्लामी जन्नत की हकीकतआपको मालूम है कि जन्नत की हकीकत क्या है ?

विश्व के लगभग सभी धर्मों में स्वर्ग और न र्कके बारे में विस्तार से वर्णन किया गया है.इन में सभी धर्मों की बातों में काफी समानता पायी जाती है.

लेकिन स्वर्ग या जन्नत के बारे में जो बातें लिखी गयी हैं वह सिर्फ पुरुषों को रिझाने वाली बातें लिखी गयी हैं.जैसे मरने के बाद जन्नत में खूबसूरत जवान हूरें मिलेंगी ,जो कभी बूढ़ी नहीं होंगी .उनकी उम्र हमेशा १४-१५ साल की रहेगी.जन्नत वाले किसी भी हूर से शारीरिक सम्बन्ध बना सकेंगे.कुरआन में एक और ख़ास बात बतायी गयी है कि जन्नत में हूरों के अलावा सुन्दर लडके भी होंगे ,जिन्हें गिलमा कहा गया है .

शायद ऐसा इसलिए कहा गया होगा कि अरब और ईरान में समलैंगिक सेक्स आम बात है. आज भी पाकिस्तान में पुरुष वेश्यावृत्ति होती है .

इसलिए अक्सर जन्नत के मजे लूटने के लिए कुछ भी करने को तैयार हो जाते हैं.लोगों ने जन्नत के लालच में दुनिया को जहन्नुम बना रखा है .इस जन्नत के लालच और जहन्नुम का दर दिखा कर सभी धर्म गुरुओं की दुकानें चल रही हैं .भोले भाले लोग जन्नत के लालच में मरान्ने मारने को तैयार हो जाते हैं ,यहाँ तक खुद आत्मघाती बम भी बन जाते हैं.

पाहिले शुरुआती दौर में तो मुसलमान हमलावर लोगों को तलवार के जोर पर मुसलमान बनाते थे.लेकिन जब खुद मुसलाम्मानों में आपस में युद्ध होने लगे तो मुआसलामानों के एक गिरोह इस्माइली लोगों ने नया रास्ता अख्तियार किया .जिस से बिना खून खराबा के आसानी से आसपास के लोगोंको मुसलमान बनाता जा सके.

नाजिरी इस्मायीलिओं के मुजाहिद और धर्म गुरु “हसन बिन सब्बाह “सन-१०९०–११२४ ने जब मिस्र में अपनी धार्मिक शिक्षा पुरीकर चकी तो वह सन १०८१ में इरान के इस्फ़हान शहर चला गया .और इरान के कजवीन प्रान्त में प्रचार करने लगा.वहां एक किला था जिसे अलामुंत कहा जाता है.यह किला तेहरान से १०० कि मी दूर,केस्पियन सागर के पास है .उस समय किले का मालिक सुलतान मालिक शाह था.उनदिनों चारों तरफ युद्ध होते रहते थे.कभी सल्जूकी कभी फातमी आपस में लड़ते थे.इसलिए सुलतान ने किले की रक्षा के लिए अलवीखानदान के एक व्यक्ती कमरुद्दीन खुराशाह को नियुक्त कर दिया था.उनदिन किला खाली पडा था..हसन बिन सब्बाह ने किला तीन हजार दीनार में खरीद लिया.

हसन को वह किला उपयोगी लगा ,क्यों कि किला सीरिया और तेहरान के मार्ग पर था .जिसपर काफिलों से व्यापार होता था.

किला एक सपाट फिसलन वाली पहाडी पर है .किले की ऊंचाई ८४० मीटर है .लेकिन वहां पानी के सोते हैं.किले की लम्बाई ४०० मीटर और चौडाई ३० मीटर है..इसके बाब हसन ने अपने लोगों और कुछ गाँव के लोगों के साथ मिलकर काफिले वालों से टेक्स लेना शुरू करदिया. इससे हसन को काफी दौलत मिली.उसके बाद हसन ने किले में तहखाने और सुरंगें भी बनवा लीं.जब किला हराभरा हो गया तो ,हसन ने किले में एक नकली जन्नत भी बनाली.जैसा कुरआन में कहा गया है,हसन आसपास के गाँव से अपने आदमियों द्वारा सुन्दर ,और कुंवारी जवान लडकियां उठावा लेताथा. और लड़किओं को अपनी जन्नत के तहखानों में कैद कर लेता था.हसन ने इस नकली जन्नत में एक नहर भी बनवाई थी ,जिसमे हमेशा शराब बहती रहती थी.किले वह सब सामान थे जो कुरआनमें जन्नत के बारे में लिखे हैं.

फिरजब हसन के लोग आसपास के गाँव में धर्म प्रचार करने जाते तो लोगों को विश्वास में लेकर उन्हें हशीस पिलाकर बेहोश कर देते थे.और जब लोग बेहोश हो जाते तो उनको उठाकर किले में ले जाते थे .उनसे कहते कि अल्लाह तुम से खुश है ,

अब तुम जन्नत में रहो.लोग कुछ दिनों तक यह नादान लोग खूब अय्याशी करते और समझते थे कि वे जन्नत में हैं.फिर कुछ दिनों मौजा मस्ती करवाने के बाद लोगों दोबारा हशीश पिलाकर वापिस गाँव छोड़ दिया जाता .एक बार जन्नत का चस्का लग जाने के बाद लोग फिर से जन्नत की इच्छा करने लगते तो ,उनसे कहा जाता कि अगर फिर से जन्नत में जाना चाहते हो तो हमारा हुक्म मानो .लोग कुछ भी करने को तैयार हो जाते थे.ऐसे लोगों को हसिसीन कहा जाता है .मार्को पोलो ने इसका अपने विवरणों में उल्लेख किया है आज भी लोग जन्नत के लालच में निर्दोषों की हत्याएं कर रहे हैं.

यह जन्नत बहुत समय तक बनी रही.जब हलाकू खान ने १५ दिसंबर १२५६ को इस किले पर हमला किया तो किले के सूबे दार ने बिना युद्ध के किला हलाकू के हवाले कर दिया.जब हलाकू किले के अन्दर गया तो देखा वहां सिर्फ अधनंगी औरतें ही थी.हलाकू ने उन लडाकिन से पूछा तुम कौन हो ,तो वह वह बोलीं “अना मलाकुन”यानी हम हूरें हैं

यह किला आज भी सीरिया और ईरान की सीमा के पास है .सन २००४ के भूकंप में किले को थोडासा नुकसान हो गया .लेकिन आज बी लोग इस किले को देखने जाते हैं .और जन्नत की हकीकत समाज जाते हैं कि जैसे यह जन्नत झूठी है वैसे ही कुरआन में बतायी गयी जन्नत भी झूठ होगी

यह लेख पाकिस्तान से प्रकाशित पुस्तक “इस्माईली मुशाहीर “के आधार पर लिखा गया है.

प्रकाशक अब्बासी लीथो आर्ट .लयाकत रोड -कराची

I Dare to pregressive practices in Islam and strongly oppose extremism. 

My writeup is definitely thought provoking but I would like to put my views with your permission as this is dire important of today’s time. 

You are assuming secular, liberal, intellectual are black and white terms. 

If you are not secular, you must be communal. 

If you are not liberal, you must be fascist. If you are not intellectual, you must be stupid. 

All opposing terms have complete negative connotation and that’s were the conflict arises.

In reality all these are very gray areas. 

There are very few people, who are really communal or secular, liberal or fascists. 90% people fall in category that neither is truly secular nor communal. 

They just have inclination towards either one. 

They believe in their religion and they believe in belonging to a community. 

Just because they believe in their own religion, does not make them anti secular or communal and this is where so called liberals force them to take a side. 

You believe in God, you are not intellectual… 

You believe in religious practices then you must not be a liberal and so and so on.

I would suggest stop doing that. 

Most of the people have good thinking capacity and they don’t need to be always told to define themselves.

 I am a hindu, so I will talk about my religion. 

History has shown that Hindus are the most tolerant people on earth. 

They never really attacked for spreading religion and they welcomed others coming here with open arms. 

Even then, what makes me mad and take side of communal people is the fact that the onus of being secular is always forced on hindus. 

These so called liberals and intellectuals always attack hindu traditions but never in single instance talk any thing about traditions in muslim religion. 

They let women like Taslima Nasreen to defend for herself. 

They never utter a word about triple talaque or burkha or for that matter anything. 

That makes other people very angry. If you are a true liberal or intellectual, you should take sides with what is right irrespective of religion but you don’t. 

That gave birth to a concept called Pseudo secularism or Pseudo intellectuals. 

So basically these Pseudos divide people in black and white. 

If u say good thing about hindu religion then you must be communal.. 

you don’t like some traditions in muslim religion, then u are fascist. 

Problem is most of the Muslims, almost 99.99% are so scared of their religion and mulla maulavis that don’t dare utter a single word against their religion. 

They are scared that fanatics would kill them as blasphemy is punishable by brutal death. 

Whole world knows that fanatics in muslim religion are responsible for almost all terror attacks anywhere in world. 

But Muslims are so scared that they don’t ever utter a word against it and the onus to prove that terrorism has no religion is shifted to others. 

They have to forcefully accept and say that terrorism has no religion to prove they are liberal or intellectual. 

When this constant pressure start building, people on the fence start moving towards their own religious extremism. 

The gray area start turning black and then you see results like Donald Trump winning hands down. 

So called liberals should analyze why this is happening. 

What people really want. 

Just calling them or branding them communal or non intellectuals is not going to solve the problem. 

In fact you do not define their core values , let them define their values for themselves. 

If you want gray turn towards white, you have to put forward real examples of being secular or liberal by not being partial. 

I dare to Islam and Mulla’s regressive practices in their religion and to strongly oppose extremism. 

When you are capable of doing that,, you can define values for nation. 

Until that your connect with people is doubtable.

Sorry for the very long write up.

%d bloggers like this: