• Blog Stats

    • 163,656 Visitors
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,073 other followers

  • Google Translator


  • FaceBook

  • Islamic Terror Attacks

  • Meta

  • iPaper Embed

  • Calendar

    December 2010
    M T W T F S S
    « Nov   Jan »
  • Authors Of Blog

  • Monthly Archives

  • Advertisements

Destruction Of Hindu Temples By Muslims – Part I

Posted by PatriotUSA/Patriot’s Corner

There is a problem with adding links on WordPress right now so I am posting this without them. Original article can be found using link at end of article.

This is from the following site:


Satyameva Jayate (Truth Alone Triumphs)

“Genocide committed in the name of Allah: 3,000,000 Bangladeshi Hindus Killed during the Pakistan-Bangladesh war in 1971. From 1894 to 1896 Abdul Hamid, Sultan of the Ottoman Empire, killed 150,000 Armenian Christians. In India, Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur along with his disciples was burned to death by the Moghul ruler Aurangzeb in 1675. Another Sikh, Bhai Mati Das was sawn into right and left halves while he was still alive. In July 1974, 4,000 Christians living in Cyprus were killed by Fahri Koroturk, president of Turkey and his Islamic army. From 1843 to 1846 10,000 Assyrian Christians including women and children were massacred by the Muslims. From 1915 to 1918 750,000 Assyrians were killed in the name of Islamic Jihad. In 1933 thousands of Assyrian villagers were murdered by the Iraqi soldiers in Northern Iraq. Since 1990 more than 10,000 Kashmiri Hindus have been brutally murdered by Islamic fundamentalists. Over 280,000 Ugandans killed during the reign of Idi Amin from 1971 to 1979. Over 30,000 Mauritanians have been killed by the Islamic dictators since 1960. In 1980, 20,000 Syrians were murdered under the rule of Hafez Al-Assad, President of Syria. Since 1992 120,000 Algerians have been murdered by the Islamic fundamentalist army.”

Destruction Of Hindu Temples By Muslims – Part I

Tejo Mahalaya, a hindu temple-palace which is now known as the Taj Mahal is just one example of Islamic barbarianism as shown by me in the previous week’s article– Taj Mahal – A Hindu Temple Palace. Hundreds and thousands of monuments and buildings all over the world have been converted to mosques and other Islamic buildings. India, as I had mentioned earlier, has suffered the most amount of destruction by these devilish fiends.

The evidence of destruction of thousands of Hindu temples can be primarily found from two different sources:

1. Literary Evidence from the work of renowned Islamic historians
2. Epigraphic Evidence from the inscriptions on numerous Mosques all over India.

In this article, I will deal with only the literary evidence. A separate article will be devoted to the epigraphic evidence.

This article is just one of the series of articles that I will be publishing regarding the plunder and conversion of Hindu temples to mosques. Hundereds of Muslim historians have glorified the deeds of their Muslim heroes all over India. I will just cite a fraction of the literary evidence available in these series of articles. This by no means is an exhaustive list! To learn more about this please read both the volumes of book, Hindu Temples: What Happened To Them?, authored by Sita Ram Goel and many others.

We have elaborate literary evidence from the Islamic sources which glorify the crimes committed by the muslims in India. Crimes such as desecration of the Hindu idols, looting of the temples, killing devotees and raping have been well documented by the Muslim historians themselves. They have done so because according to them these muslim rulers by doing such deeds were following the tenets of Islam and sunnah of the prophet Mohammed. This brings me back to my original point which I have made in my earlier articles: Islam not only justifies rape, murder, plunder and destruction, but in fact, it was originated to attract followers with such inclination. To know more about this read my previous article, Excessive Kindness Of Islam.

The literary evidence stated below is in chronological order with reference to the time at which a particular work was written.

Name Of The Book: Hindustan Islami Ahad mein (India under Islamic Rule)
Name Of The Historian: Maulana Abdul Hai.

About The Author: He is a highly respected scholar and taken as an authority on Islamic history. Because of his scholarship and his services to Islam, Maulana Abdul Hai was appointed as the Rector of the Darul Nadwa Ullum Nadwatal-Ulama. He continued in that post till his death in February 1923.

The following section is taken from the chapter Hindustan ki Masjidein (The mosques of India) of the above mentioned book. Here we can see a brief description of few important mosques in India and how each one of them was built upon plundered Hindu temples.

1. Qawwat al-Islam Mosque at Delhi:
“According to my findings the first mosque of Delhi is Qubbat al-Islam or Quwwat al_Islam which, Qutubud-Din Aibak constructed in H. 587 after demolishing the hindu temple built by Prithvi Raj and leaving certain parts of the temple outside the mosque proper; and when he returned from Ghazni in H. 592 he started building, under orders from Shihabud -Din Ghori, a huge mosque of inimitable red stones, and certain parts of the temple were included in the mosque…”

2. The Mosque at Jaunpur:
“This was built by Sultan Ibrahim Sharqi with chiselled stones. Originally it was a Hindu temple after demolishing which he constructed the mosque. It is known as the Atala Masjid..”

3. The Mosque at Qanauj:
“It is well known that this mosque was built on the foundations of some Hindu temple that stood here. The mosque was built by Ibrahim Sharqi in H. 809 as is recorded in Gharbat Nigar”

4. Jami Masjid at Etwah:
“This mosque stands on the bank of the Jamuna at Etawah. There was a Hindu temple at this place, on the site of which this mosque was constructed..”

5. Babri Masjid at Ayodhya:
“This mosque was constructed by Babar at Ayodhya which Hindus call the birth place of Ramchandraji… Sita had a temple here in which she lived and cooked for her husband. On that very site Babar constructed this mosque in H.963 ”

6. Mosque at Benaras:
“Mosque of Benares was built by Alamgir Aurangzeb on the site of Bisheshwar Temple. That temple was very tall and held as holy among Hindus. On this very site and with those very stones he constructed a lofty mosque, and its ancient stones were rearranged after being embedded in the walls of the mosque. It is one of the renowned mosques of Hindustan.”

7. Mosque at Mathura:
“Alamgir Aurangzeb built a mosque at Mathura. This mosque was built on site of the Govind Dev Temple which was very strong and beautiful as well as exquisite..”

Name Of The Book: Futuhu’l-Buldan
Name Of The Historian: Ahmed bin Yahya bin Jabir
About The Author: This author is also known as al- Biladhuri. He lived at the court of Khalifa Al- Mutawakkal (AD 847-861) and died in AD 893. His history is one of the major Arab chronicles.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
1.Ibn Samurah (AD 653)Siestan (Iran)
“On reaching Dawar, he surrounded the enemy in the mountain of Zur, where there was a famous Hindu temple.” “…Their idol of Zur was of gold, and its eyes were two rubies. The zealous Musalmans cut off its hands and plucked out its eyes, and then remarked to the Marzaban how powerless was his idol…”

2.Qutaibah bin Muslim al-Bahili (AD 705-715)Samarkand (Farghana)
“Other authorities say that Kutaibah granted peace for 700,000 dirhams and entertainment for the Moslems for three days. The terms of surrender included also the houses of the idols and the fire temples. The idols were thrown out, plundered of their ornaments and burned…”

3.Mohammed bin Qasim (AD 712-715)
Debal (Sindh) “…The town was thus taken by assault, and the carnage endured for three days. The governor of the town, appointed by Dahir, fled and the priests of the temple were massacred. Muhammad marked a place for the Musalmans to dwell in, built a mosque, and left 4,000 Musalmans to garrison the place…”
“…’Ambissa son of Ishak Az Zabbi, the governor of Sindh, in the Khilafat of Mu’tasim billah knocked down the upper part of the minaret of the temple and converted it into a prison…”

Multan (Punjab)“…He then crossed the Biyas, and went towards Multan…Muhammad destroyed the water-course; upon which the inhabitants, oppressed with thirst, surrendered at discretion. He massacred the men capable of bearing arms, but the children were taken captive, as well as ministers of the temple, to the number of 6,000. The Musalmans found there much gold in a chamber ten cubits long by eight broad…”

4.Hasham bin ‘Amru al-Taghlabi Khandahar (Maharashtra) “He then went to Khandahar in boats and conquered it. He destroyed the Budd (idol) there, and built in its place a mosque.”

Name Of The Book: Tarikh-i-Tabari
Name Of The Historian: Abu Ja’far Muhammad bin Jarir at-Tabari
About The Author: This author is considered to be the foremost historian of Islam. The above mentioned book written by him is regarded as the mother of histories.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:

1.Qutaibah bin Muslim al-Bahili (AD 705-715)
Beykund (Khurasan)
“The ultimate capture of Beykund (in AD 706) rewarded him with an incalculable booty; even more than had hitherto fallen into the hands of the Mohammedans by the conquest of the entire province of Khorassaun; and the unfortunate merchants of the town, having been absent on a trading excursion while their country was assailed by the enemy, and finding their habitations desolate on their return contributed further to enrich the invaders, by the ransom which they paid for the recovery of their wives and children. The oranments alone, of which these women had been plundered, being melted down, produce, in gold, 150,000 meskals; of a dram and a half each. Among the articles of the booty, is also described an image of gold, of 50,000 meskals, of which the eyes were two pearls, the exquisite beauty and magnitude of which excited the surprise and admiration of Kateibah. They were transmitted by him, with a fifth of the spoil to Hejauje, together with a request that he might be permitted to distribute, to the troops, the arms which had been found in the palace in great profusion.”

Samarkand (Farghana)
“A breach was, however, at last effected in the walls of the city in AD 712 by the warlike machines of Kateibah; and some of the most daring of its defenders having fallen by the skill of his archers, the besieged demanded a cessation of arms to the following day, when they promised to capitulate. The request was acceded to the Kateibah; and a treaty was the next day accordingly concluded between him and the prince of Samarkand, by which the latter engaged for the annual payment of ten million of dhirems, and a supply of three thousand slaves; of whom it was particularly stipulated, that none should either be in a state of infancy, or ineffective from old age and debility. He further contracted that the ministers of his religion should be expelled from their temples and their idols destroyed and burnt; that Kateibah should be allowed to establish a mosque in the place of the principal temple….”
“…Kateibah accordingly set set fire to the whole collection with his own hands; it was soon consumed to ashes, and 50,000 meskals of gold and silver, collected from the nails which had been used in the workmanship of the images.”

2.Yaqub bin Laith (AD 870-871)Balkh and Kabul (Afghanistan)
“He took Bamian, which he probably reached by way of Herat, and then marched on Balkh where he ruined (the temple) Naushad. On his way back from Balkh he attacked Kabul…””Starting from Panjhir, the place he is known to have visited, he must have passed through the capital city of the Hindu Sahis to rob the sacred temple — the reputed place of coronation of the Sahi rulers — of its sculptural wealth…”
“The exact details of the spoil collected from Kabul valley are lacking. The Tarikh [-i-Sistan] records 50 idols of gold and silver and Mas’udi mentions elephants. The wonder excited in Baghdad by baghdad by elephants and pagan idols forwarded to the Caliph by Ya’qub also speaks for their high value.”

Name Of The Book: Tarikhu’l-Hind
Name Of The Historian: Abu Rihan Muhammad bin Ahmad al-Biruni al-Khwarizmi.
About The Author: This author spent 40 years in India during the reign of Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni (AD 997 – 1030). His history treats of the literature and learning of the Hindus at the commencement of the 11th century.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
1.Jalam ibn Shaiban (9th century AD)Multan (Punjab)“A famous idol of theirs was that of Multan, dedicated to the sun, and therefore called Aditya. It was of wood and covered with red Cordovan leather; in its two eyes were two red rubies. It is said to have been made in the last Kritayuga …..When Muhammad Ibn Alkasim Ibn Almunaibh conquered Multan, he inquired how the town had become so very flourishing and so many treasures had there been accumulated, and then he found out that this idol was the cause, for there came pilgrims from all sides to visit it. Therefore he thought it best to have the idol where it was, but he hung a piece of cow’s flesh on its neck by way of mockery. On the same place a mosque was built. When the Karmatians occupied Multan, Jalam Ibn Shaiban, the usurper, broke the idol into pieces and killed its priests…”


2.Sultan Mahmud of Gazni (AD 997-1030)Thanesar (Haryana)“The city of Taneshar is highly venerated by Hindus. The idol of that place is called Cakrasvamin, i.e. the owner of the cakra, a weapon which we have already described. It is of bronze, and is nearly the size of a man. It is now lying in the hippodrome in Ghazna, together with the Lord of Somnath, which is a representation of the penis of the Mahadeva, called Linga.”


Somnath (Gujrat)“The linga he raised was the stone of Somnath, for soma means the moon and natan means master, so that the whole word means master of the moon. The image was destroyed by the Prince Mahmud, may God be merciful to him! –AH 416. He ordered the upper part to be broken and the remainder to be transported to his residence, Ghaznin, with all its coverings and trappings of gold, jewels, and embroided garments. Part of it has been thrown into the hippodrome of the town, together with Cakrasvamin , an idol of bronze, that had been brought from Taneshar. Another part of the idol from Somnath lies before the door of the mosque of Ghaznin, on which people rub their feet to clean them from dirt and wet.”


Name Of The Book: Kitabu’l-Yamini Name Of The Historian: Abu Nasr Muhammad ibn Muhammad al Jabbaru’l-Utbi.
About The Author: This author’s work comprises the whole of the reign of Subuktigin and that of Sultan Mahmud down to the year AD 1020.
The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:
1.Amir Sbuktigin Of Ghazni Lamghan (Afghanistan) “The Amir marched out towards Lamghan, which is a city celebrated for its great strength and abounding wealth. He conquered it and set fire to the places in its vicinity which were inhabited by infidels, and demolishing idol temples, he established Islam in them. He marched and captured other cities and killed the polluted wretches, destroying the idolaters and gratifying the Musulmans.”


2. Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni (AD 997-1030) Narain (Rajasthan)“The Sultan again resolved on an expedition to Hind, and marched towards Narain, urging his horses and moving over ground, hard and soft, until he came to the middle of Hind, where he reduced chiefs, who, up to that time obeyed no master, overturned their idols, put to the sword the vagabonds of that country, and with delay and circumspection proceeded to accomplish his design…”

Nardin (Punjab) “After the Sultan had purified Hind from idolatry, and raised mosques therein, he determined to invade the capital of Hind to punish those who kept idols and would not acknowledge the unity of God…He marched with a large army in the year AH 404 (AD 1013) during a dark night…”
“A stone was found there in the temple of the great Budda on which an inscription was written purporting that the temple had been founded 50,000 years ago. The Sultan was surprised at the ignorance of these people, because those who believe in the true faith represent that only seven hundred years have elapsed since the creation of the world, and the signs of resurrection are even now approaching . The Sultan asked his wise men the meaning of this inscription and they all concurred in saying that it was false, and no faith was to be put in the evidence of a stone.”


Thanesar (Haryana) “The chief of Tanesar was…obstinate in his infidelity and denial of God. So the Sultan marched against him with his valiant warriors, for the purpose of planting the standards of Islam and extirpating idolatry..”
“The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously, that the stream was discoloured, not withstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it…The victory gained by God’s grace, who has established Islam for ever as the best religions, notwithstanding that idolaters revolt against it…Praise be to God, the protector of the world, for the honour he bestows upon Islam and Musulmans.”


Mathura (Uttar Pradesh) “The Sultan then departed from the environs of the city, in which was a temple of the Hindus. The name of this place was Mahartul Hind… On both sides of the city there were a thousand houses, to which idol temples were attached, all strengthened from top to bottom by rivets of iron, and all made of masonry work… “In the middle of the city there was a temple larger and firmer than the rest, which can neither be described nor painted. The Sultan thus wrote respecting it: –‘If any should wish to construct a building equal to this, he would not be able to do it without expending an 100,000,000 red dinars, and it would occupy 200 years even though the most experience and able workmen were employed’… The Sultan gave orders that all temples should be burnt with naptha and fire, and levelled with the ground.”


Kanauj (Uttar Pradesh)“In Kanauj there were nearly 10,000 temples, which the idolaters falsely and absurdly represented to have been founded by their ancestors two or three hundred thousand years ago…Many of the inhabitants of the place fled and were scattered abroad like so many wretched widows and orphans, from the fear which oppressed them, in consequence of witnessing the fate of their deaf and dumb idols. Many of them thus effected their escape, and those who did not fly were put to death.”

Original article is here.


3 Responses

  1. How the Ayodhya verdict plays out in Pakistan
    October 01, 2010 18:31 IST Hamid Mir is executive editor of Geo TV in Pakistan

    Pakistani peacenik Hamid Mir’s singular idea to ensure extremists in his country do not retaliate over the Ayodhya verdict.

    Why are so many Pakistanis demonstrating against an India in court’s verdict on the Babri Mosque issue? It’s a question I have been pondering ever since I saw protest rallies in Karachi and Lahore on television channels immediately after the verdict of the Allahabad High Court on September 30. Many Pakistanis feel this verdict is not ‘legal’ but ‘political’. I was disturbed to watch a late-night TV show on September 30 in which a friend claimed, “no Hindu temple had ever came under attack in Pakistan, but Hindus have destroyed many mosques in India”.

    I remember dozens of Hindu temples did come under attack in Pakistan after the demolition of the Babri mosque in India in 1992. If that demolition was wrong, then attacks on Hindu temples in Pakistan, were wrong as well. And we should not try and hide our wrongdoings under the cover of the Allahabad High Court verdict.

    Luckily enough, there are some bold and brave analysts in Pakistan, who did say we should not play politics in the name of the Babri mosque, but most Pakistani TV channels did not behave like Indian TV channels after the 26/11 Mumbai [ Images ] attacks.

    This is the first time that the Pakistani media did not attempt to spread hatred against Hindus. In fact, the coverage of Pakistan’s biggest private news channel Geo TV was very balanced. Geo TV highlighted the views of all the three judges on the bench of Allahabad High Court including one Muslim, Justice Sibghatullah Khan, who also favoured the division of the land among Hindus and Muslims.

    A majority of Pakistani Muslims belong to the Sunni Barelvi school of thought. The most respected Sunni Barelvi scholar Mufti Muneebur Rehman appeared on Geo TV and said that the Allahabad High Court verdict was political, but appealed to Indian Muslims that, “they should control their sentiments and they should avoid violence in the name of Islam”.

    Rehman should also appeal to Pakistani Muslims that not play into the hands of those who are trying to start violence in Pakistan in the name of the Babri Mosque.

    I remember the attacks against Hindu temples in Pakistan after the demolition of the Babri Masjid in 1992 and I covered many attacks in Lahore as a young reporter. Extremist groups in Pakistan fully exploited the tragedy and in fact, were the main beneficiaries of the dispute because they tried to give an impression that all the Indian Hindus were enemies of Indian Muslims, which was not a fact. The Babri Masjid dispute was the tool of many religious groups to politick and a favorite subject of many writers and journalists in Pakistan till 2001.

    But 9/11 changed the world and the focus of Pakistani extremist groups shifted from India to the US. The Babri dispute lost importance in Pakistan after the attack of Pakistan army on Lal Masjid in Islamabad in 2007. A majority of Pakistani Muslims rightly or wrongly felt that Pervez Musharraf created the theatre where the drama of the Lal Masjid operation was used to divert the attention of common Pakistanis from the lawyers’ movement on then, in support of the deposed Chief Justice of Pakistan.

    I remember many Muslim scholars in 2007 said they always condemned extremist Hindus who attacked Babri Masjid, but could say little when the Pakistan army attacked a masjid in Islamabad in the name of war against terror.

    The Lal Masjid operation created more extremism in Pakistan and was a turning point in our history. Extremists began suicide attacks against security forces all over the country and even attacking those mosques where officials of security forces offered prayers. I can never forget the images of destroyed mosques in Swat, Buner ,Dir, Khyber and other places in Pakistan, destroyed by Muslims not Hindus. Most of these mosques became targets of suicide bombers and some were destroyed due to fights between militants and security forces.

    How can I forget the images of Pradlane mosque in Rawalpindi attacked by bearded Muslims the Taliban took responsibility for the attack. We must admit that more mosques were destroyed in Pakistan by so-called Muslim militants as compared to mosques destroyed in India by non-Muslims. Let the Indian Muslims and Hindus resolve their dispute through legal recourse. We must not politick in the name of the Babri masjid.

    So, what should we do as Pakistani Muslims? We must try to give more legal, political and moral protection to our minorities. I have already suggested to friends in the government and opposition parties that we should take more care of Pakistani Hindus, Sikhs and Christians.

    We must allow them to build as many temples and churches they so want. We must discourage the powerful land mafia in Pakistan, which always grab lands of Hindu temples and Christian churches in areas like Sind and Central Punjab .When we give them more protection, Indians will also do likewise.

    Pakistanis should secure their mosques because those are the targets of Muslim extremists, not Hindus.

    Extremism is a way of thinking. Extremists have no religion, but sometimes act in the name of Islam, sometimes in the name of Hindu dharma and sometimes in the name of Christianity. We must condemn all.

    The best way to condemn extremism is to build a Hindu temple in Pakistan in the name of the Babri mosque demolished in India. We must not forget that Zaheerudin Babar built not only mosques, but Hindu temples as well, across India. Can’t we build one Hindu temple in his name? It will give a very positive message across the border.

    When Indian Hindus demolished one Babri Mosque in 1992, Pakistanis retaliated by attacking many Hindu temples in Pakistan. When an Indian court divided the land of the Babri masjid among Hindus and Muslims in 2010, Pakistanis should not retaliate but built a Hindu temple instead. It will not be a sign of weakness, but a goodwill gesture and Indians can truly believe Pakistan is changing and should also change their way of thinking.


  2. Jai Hind!!!


  3. it is so unfortunate,,that the hindus r being treated like this in bharat,and our temples r distructed,and the bloody khangress,still supports them.IT IS A SHAME THAT THEY R BEING ELECTED!SEE WHT DIGVIJAY,THE BASTARD HAVE TO SAY ABT KAHRE’S DEATH!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: