Bow Nobama’s Terrorist Connection

Bow Nobama is right on India, wrong on Pakistan and his terrorist connection by appointing Kathawari of EHAN ALLEN. By M D Nalapat and Sam HIndu   The presence of a very influential pro-Pakistan group within the Pentagon and a pro-China lobby within the Department of Commerce during the Clinton,Bush and now Obama periods have ensured that this blacklisting of India has endured to the present. It was with surprise, therefore, that the Pakistan and China lobbies in the US reacted to President Obama’s promise (made before the Indian Parliament on November 9) to remove India from the so-called “Entity Lists”, and to give the world’s most populous democracy the same status as Germany and Japan.   The Pakistan army is aware that there can be no solution to Kashmir for decades to come,which is why they seek to blackmail NATO by demanding Indian concessions that this alliance is in no condition to enforce. Instead, those Pakistani generals, brigadiers and colonels who assist the Taliban and other terror groups (including the JeM and the LeT) should be subject to the same sanctions as are being applied to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. SIX weeks before leaving for Mumbai, President Barack Obama appointed a Kashmiri furniture dealer from New York, Farook Kathwari, Boycott Ethan Allen Which is supporting Terrorist Jihad. as a member of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Asian American and Pacific Islander affairs Kathwari is a generous financial backer of groups that have sought to integrate Kashmir with Pakistan. His own son left for Pakistan during the Clinton presidency to train as a jihadist. After developing expertise in the handling of AK-47s and the use of grenades, Kathwari Junior was inserted into the Kashmir valley by the ISI (an organisation that has had close and open links to Kathwari Senior since the 1970s), only to fall to an Indian bullet. On getting news of this, Kathwari held a get-together in his New York apartment to celebrate the young man’s martyrdom. All this, of course,was before 9/11 made jihad unfashionable for New Yorkers. Kathwari’s embrace of jihad and collaboration with the ISI’s schemes for acts of violence in India have not stood in the way of this backer of violence in Kashmir developing a close personal bond with Bill Clinton’s team, a warmth that endures to the present. He has repeatedly peppered both the US Congress as well as the US Administration with tracts explaining why the full might of the US ought to be deployed to secure “azaadi” for the Kashmiri people“. Of course, to Kathwari, the “people of Kashmir” comprise only the 780,000 Valley inhabitants who are Wahabbis, rather than the other six million Kashmiris, who are content to remain within India, and who include the state’s Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists, besides the Muslim Shia, Gujjas, Sufi and Bakkerwal community. In the international media and western chancelleries, the implicit assumption made while discussing Kashmir is that the state is comprised only of its Wahabbi minority, a view that geopolitical links between the West and the biggest financial backer of Kashmiri Wahabbis-Saudi Arabia -have only reinforced. Looking through the columns of the New York Times, The Washington Post or the Guardian, one may be forgiven for believing that Kashmir is exclusively Wahabbi,for it is only the views of that minority that get represented in these columns as “Kashmiri” opinion.Our own copycat media follows this trend faithfully. The sharp spike in terrorist incidents in Kashmir during the 2000 visit of (then) President Clinton to India was because it had been the Arkansan’s administration that had pushed and pummelled India for eight years in an effort to force it to surrender control over Kashmir. The jihadis had hoped that the innocent blood that they spilled in grisly terrorist incidents would strengthen their friend Clinton in forcing concessions from the Vajpayee government (which incidentally was nudged by the Clinton team into accepting Farook Kathwari as an “interlocuter” in its Kashmir dialogue, a shameful decision). President Clinton had linked a “solution of the Kashmir problem” to Pakistan’s satisfaction as proof that India was a “mature nation”. Mature enough, that is, to commit suicide. While a US Senator, Hillary Clinton continued her husband’s cosy links to Kathwari and other pro-Pakistan lobbyists in DC, New York, Chicago and elsewhere,and has been known to favour the continuance of the harsh Clinton policy of placing India in the same basket as Iran and North Korea, when it comes to the question of access to US “dual use” ( or hi-tech) items. The presence of a very influential pro-Pakistan group within the Pentagon and a pro-China lobby within the Department of Commerce during the Clinton, Bush and now Obama periods have ensured that this blacklisting of India has endured to the present. It was with surprise, therefore, that the Pakistan and China lobbies in the US reacted to President Obama’s promise (made before the Indian parliament on November 9) to remove India from the so-called “Entity Lists”, and to give the world’s most populous democracy the same status as Germany and Japan. Obama further sweetened his message by placing the US behind India’s bid to become a permament member of the UN Security Council, a policy already accepted by Russia, France and the UK, thereby leaving only China out as the only P-5 (Permanent Five) member not to back India as a permanent member of the UNSC. The powerful trio of Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has been sceptical of what may be termed the “George W Bush line” (or, indeed, the Franklin Roosevelt line) of treating India on par with key US allies. The three have repeatedly pointed to the lack of tact and transparency in India as reasons why the policy concessions announced by President Obama ought to have been denied till “the Indians make substantive concessions”. Robert Gates has followed the advice of key assistants in insisting on Delhi accepting the same conditions for transfer of US equipment that Islamabad does. The difference-be sides the ones obvious to all except Gates and his team-is that the Pakistan side routinely signs agreements that it has no intention of ever keeping, while in India, a nervous bureacracy (eager for its prized UN and World Bank assignments,all of which depend on goodwill from both the US as well as China) ensures that commitments are kept. Had the US Defense Secretary shown a modicum of flexibility in his dealings with India, by now at least two of the three agreements that he has been pressing the Manmohan Singh government to sign since 2005 would have been inked: that on the provision of logistical support,and the other on communications security. In the case of Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, he has developed a fixation with China, an attitude that has led him to neglect the potential for US businesses in India. In common with his Bush-era predecessor, Locke has been pushing India for concessions that would amount to political suicide for Manmohan Singh, such as opening up the retail trade to foreign brands without placing restrictions that protect the 28 million jobs that “kirana” (or small) retail trade provides in India. The US Commerce Secretary has become accustomed to doing business with China, a country where there is no need to consult public opinion before taking a decision. In this irritation with the admittedly more roundabout procedures of a democracy, and in his reluctance to take India off the list of countries that US companies face major hurdles in doing business with, Locke has been on the same page of Hillary Clinton, who has thus far followed the Bill Clinton line on foreign policy, including on relations with India, China and Pakistan. That President Obama did not bring along the Secretary of State on his India tour was an early indication that he was planning to jettison the Clinton policy of giving only minor concessions in exchange for substantive and significant changes in Indian policies. Instead, he has adopted a bold policy of accepting India’s case that this democracy of 1.2 billion people deserves at the least the same treatment as is given to Germany, France and Japan. If the 2008 India-specific waiver at the Nuclear Suppliers Group indicated the beginning of the end of the US policy of boxing India into a lesser category than its main NATO allies, the November 9,2010 Obama speech before the Indian parliament seems to have signalled the start of a “Relationship of Equals” between the US and India. As “equal”, that is, as Japan or Germany are with the US. Two years into his Presidency, Barack Obama seems to be freeing himself of the Clinton fetters that ensured his humiliation in the just-concluded Congressional polls. In his India policy, he has certainly shown that he favours change, and that he has the fire within him to force through that change over the wishes of his India-sceptic troika, Gates, Locke and Clinton. However, if the US-and the entire international community-is to get the benefit of such a re-assertion of Obama over Clinton, President Obama needs to break away from the Afghanistan-Pakistan policy that he has inherited from Bill Clinton and Dick Cheney, that of relying on the Pakistan army to take down the Taliban. That so many in the US cling to such a delusion is not surprising in a country where more than half the population believes that Saddam Hussein was the head of Al Qaeda, when in fact that mishmash of relics spent years seeking to murder him, a task successfully carried out by George W Bush,who thereupon avenged the attempted assassination of Bush Senior by Saddam a decade before he occupied Iraq. Unless the US and other NATO forces remove the imaginary distinction between the Pakistan and Afghanistan Pashtun belt,and treat the entire territory as a single military zone, they will continue to find the Taliban regrouping. The Pakistan army lacks the resilience and the training to take on the Taliban, no matter the extent to which they are stuffed with US weapons. NATO troops need to remove the safe havens from Pakistan by a judicious use of land,air and sea-power. Although this may be opposed initially by Pakistan (especially its military), the positive results within Pakistan society of the elimination of the Taliban will more than compensate for such temporary discord. There is nothing that India can do to make Pakistan more stable, unless Islamabad first allows free trade between the two countries, and opens up hitherto-blocked transit routes.The Obama administration needs to ensure such outcomes The Pakistan army is aware that there can be no solution to Kashmir for decades to come, which is why they seek to blackmail NATO by demanding Indian concessions that this alliance is in no condition to enforce. Instead, those Pakistani generals, brigadiers and colonels who assist the Taliban and other terror groups (including the JeM and the LeT) should be subject to the same sanctions as are being applied to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. They should be arrested if travelling abroad, and their dependents ought to be prevented from foreign travel, as it is more than likely that these may be acting as carriers of instructions and money to terror groups. Unless the Pakistan army feels the pain of backing the terror groups, they will continue to do so. Unfortunately, both the Vajpayee as well as the Manmohan Singh governments have dealt with Pakistan in a very Mahatma Gandhi fashion, with India making all the sacrifices. NATO is going down the same path. Unless it be understood that Pakistan can be saved from implosion only if the military is prevented from backing terror groups, the descent of that country towards extreme chaos will continue. It is not India that can ensure a stable Pakistan but NATO, by enforcing accountability on a military that has been surviving on handouts from the US, China and Saudi Arabia. And what about a stable India? The only way to ensure this is to take ruthless action against the corruption that has pervaded every aspect of governmental operations. The US has excellent ways of tracking money flows. Manmohan Singh needs to ask President Obama to forge a partnership with India that would give access to the results of US monitoring of illegal money flows from India into safe havens such as London, Dubai, Singapore and Macau. These days, too many politicians are escaping the attention of Indian agencies, rendered toothless by the over-tasking that has been a feature of the Chidambaram period in the Union Finance Ministry. The current Home Minister brought in numerous new restrictions and powers “to fight Black Money”. However, he knew full well that each such tightening of the regulatory screw would lead to massive increases in bribes, the reason why Palaniappan Chidambaram is a hero to legions of corrupt officials. Instead, what needs to be enforced is better monitoring, and because so much of the cash is going abroad (often in lorryloads of currency via the Nepal border), the help of the US needs to be taken to identify the major perpetrators. Such help can uncover the fresh deposits being made from India, so that those responsible can be exposed to public scrutiny. A stable Pakistan needs a military removed from jihad. A stable India needs to see its VVIP corrupt in jail. Boycott Ethan Allen Which is supporting Terrorist Jihad.

Obama the Moslim Mole in Our White House must be Removed Legally NOW!

by Mark Robinson  & SAM HINDU   Get yourself something cool to drink, find a relaxing position, and let’s examine what has happened, but before we continue I want you to vividly remember those two jet airliners slamming into the twin towers of lower Manhattan.

 I want you to remember those American citizens just like you who jumped from the fiery flames to their death because that end would be quicker, less painful. Please remember the dancing and cheering from the Arab Street. Keep those images indelibly in your vision, because the Muslim White House would have you believe “ground zero” doesn’t matter anymore. Bow O’bama a Islam’s Lawyer. (via Sam Hindu’s Blog)

 Since February, 2010, Barack Obama has givenWhy is the FBI giving guided tours of its top-secret facilities to terror-linked Muslims?  Islamic terrorist organization HAMAS, $1.23 billion U.S. dollars. Additionally, Obama has agreed to take 100,000 Gaza residents into the United States as ‘resettled immigrants,” all on your tax dollars. How will these “refugees” find a job with an unemployment rate of 12% here?

 This president refuses to prosecute the Muslim mastermind of the U.S.S. Cole bombing in 2000, which took the lives of 17 American sailors, yet he persisted in the prosecution of Navy SEAL Matthew McCabe and 1LT Michael Behenna for doing their jobs to fight Muslim Al Qaeda. If I am A Terrorist I would Attack USA Now. … Why ? Read On…

 What? Whose side is Obama on? Bow O’bama a Islam’s Lawyer. (via Sam Hindu’s Blog)  Any president in American history would have decorated both young men for their heroism on national television. Obama’s answer? Coddle the brutal murderer of 30 United States soldiers at Ft. Hood, Texas, Nadal Hasan, and continue his contemptuous assault on our military.

 But what can you expect from a “president” Conflict of Conscience between Muslim Obama and President Obama, Part 2 (via Sam Hindu’s Blog) who holds a special White House Ramadan dinner for 100 of his close Muslim friends (many with ties to terrorism) Bow O’bama a Islam’s Lawyer. and basks in the applause of his support to build a “mosque de triomph” at ground zero, which will be used as Sharia finance center.

 He and his sycophant Muslim apologists continue their efforts to strengthen the false conception of Islam as a benign religion. This chorus of Islamophiles warble melodious delights about a “peaceful” Islam. They want to airbrushed out the misery and spoliation of conquered people, the executions and martyrdoms, the rapes, and pedophilia, the child abuse, the humiliations and oppression, and the 15,486 Muslim terrorists bombings and human carnage since 911. Obama issues order preventing use of lawful interrogation techniques against jihadists

 Despite our Presidents protestations, such historical facts are the only important information needed as far as “understanding Islam.” Could this be the reason Obama’s approval rating among Americans is 41 percent and his approval rating among Muslims is 78 per cent? License Required for your HOUSE? – yup !!! Bow Obama will take Housing Market in Toilet..

How can any thinking, clear minded American make sense of such things?

Telling audiences that “Islam has contributed to the rich history of America” is a lie Obama continues to spread in challenged. Islam, and Muslims, did NOT have any influence on our founding or our culture. Obama fails to tell his drug induced crowd of followers that the Koran (the “Holy Koran as he calls it) tells readers 109 times to murder infidels and Jews. How positively “peaceful.”  Obama backs Mosque near ground zero , Wake Up America. BowObama Showing True Colors. (via Santosh Bhatt’s Blog)

 But what else do you expect from a foreign-born Muslim who endorsed the mosque at ground zero in New York by having the gall to wrap his decision in the cloak of the First Amendment. Any real American president would feel the pain of Americans from 911 and put a stop to the mosque. Obama backs Mosque near ground zero , Wake Up America. BowObama Showing True Colors. (via Santosh Bhatt’s Blog)  What a slap in the face of every American citizen! Obama’s disdain for America continues unabated as he approves to finance the fund-raising “sensitivity tour” of his friend Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, (who said in a 2001 interview that the United States was responsible for 911, that the blood was on OUR hands). Did you realize you were paying for Rauf’s trip around Europe, the Middle East and all of his expenses? This gets even worse: Obama approved millions to be spent on the renovation of mosques in 27 countries around the world. Isn’t it nice knowing where your tax dollars are being spent during the biggest recession since 1929?  French President Sarkozy Calls Obama Insane – Atlas Shrugs

 Obama, foreign-born? Yes, that nasty “missing birth certificate” hasn’t gone away, and the nation of Kenya continues to insist he is their native. Obama’s hatred of America is further revealed in his steadfast refusal to defend the borders of the United States and submit the State of Arizona to the United Nations for violation of human rights? Violation of human rights?

 Needs to report his beloved Islam for butchering women! The State of Arizona is only trying to do HIS job because he will not. This president has opened the door for terrorists and disease to freely enter America, and for that alone he should be impeached.

 This week Obama ordered the release of several hundred captured “illegal aliens,” violating our immigration laws and imposing a back door amnesty plan without the consent of Congress. Obama doesn’t care about you, the crime caused by illegals, the expense of a few hundred thousand anchor babies or who will pay for them. He obviously doesn’t care that an illegal could enter the United States with smallpox or a nuclear weapon and murder 80,000 Americans.

Someone raised in the world’s most Muslim nation, Indonesia, doesn’t care about you. Someone with close ties to Muslim terrorism in the Middle East and Africa doesn’t care about your day-to-day issues; he cannot identify; his heart and sympathies lie elsewhere.

 Is Barack Hussein Obama President of the United States or merely a katib (secretary to the Islamic Caliph)? Angry and informed Americans already know the answer. Those Who are Supporting A Mosque Near Ground Zero May Learn a Lesson FROM Ayodhya.

Look at ISLAMONCAPITALHILL.COM to see his agenda.

 His disdain for America, our history and our traditions, grows more contemptible (and obvious) each day. Americans be damned, nothing can sway him. Those who had any doubts are learning why a guy named “Barry” would change his name to match Mohammed’s horse: Barack.

 Where is America’s liberal press in all this mess? Drinking the kool-aid of our first black president, they forget his allegiances lie with Muslims because being called a “racist” by the White House is a fate worse than destruction at the hands of Islam.

 Remember in his book “Dreams of My Father” that Obama said “if the political winds shift in an ugly direction I will side with them (Muslims)?” Well, he meant it!

 We face in the coming months and years critical points in history that will determine our future existence as a sovereign nation. To scale the fortress walls of financial ruin brought-on by the indulgent “stim-you-less” waste of a trillion dollars that did nothing more than pay-off Obama’s campaign contributors and a catastrophic housing finance scheme fueled by insistent liberal meddling, we need an American aware of the need of financial restraint and not someone who continues to wholesale spend (including unlimited lavish vacations).

 These are the times that try men’s souls; a time requiring unity. We must not be torn-apart by someone forcing the nation of Islam onto our culture. Democrats too much realize, we are at that apogee in American history that we must save our country first, or we will not have a two-party political system to save.

 Americans realize we need a president that was raised in America; one who would say “the most beautiful sound is the song “ is ‘America the Beautiful,’ not “the Azan, or early morning Muslim prayer call.” Americans are fed-up with Acorn, and Islam and Chicago thug politics and a president who uses a gold Arabic cloth as his speech backdrop instead of the Stars and Stripes of our national flag.

 America is disgusted with the racism and bigotry spread by the likes of Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan and Barack Obama. We want a president who will instruct NASA that their job is space exploration, not making murdering Muslims feel good about themselves.

 We want our nation back before it’s too late. Which side are you on?

 

Related Articles

• Eugene Cho: Is He a Christian, a Muslim, or a Cactus? Why Can’t We Just Believe President Obama? (huffingtonpost.com)
• Obama: ‘I’m a Christian by choice’ (politico.com)
• Obama’s Not A Muslim: Not That There Is Anything Wrong With That (blogcritics.org)
• US: Obama’s relationship with Islamic terror suspect Hatem Abudayyeh (tea-and-politics.blogspot.com)
• Obama Defends ‘Ground Zero Mosque’: “We Are Not At War Against Islam” (mediaite.com)

Conflict of Conscience between Muslim Obama and President Obama, Part 2 (via Sam Hindu’s Blog)

Conflict of Conscience between Muslim Obama and President Obama, Part 2 By FFI Contributing Editor Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari   When the first part of this article was posted in the FFI, a reader commented, “USA wants the people in power to be devout Christians. So, in order to grab presidential position, it was necessary for Obama to convert him to Christianity. But inside, he remains still sympathetic to islam and muslims. And I think a man of hi … Read More

via Sam Hindu’s Blog

Conflict of Conscience between Muslim Obama and President Obama, Part 2

By FFI Contributing Editor Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari  

When the first part of this article was posted in the FFI, a reader commented, “USA wants the people in power to be devout Christians. So, in order to grab presidential position, it was necessary for Obama to convert him to Christianity. But inside, he remains still sympathetic to islam and muslims. And I think a man of high caliber like Ahmed Aboul Gheit will lie what Obama said to him.” So, the reader has admitted his confusion over Obama’s religion. In reality, Obama’s conversion to Christianity is simply a rumour and he never changed his religion. He was a Muslim before becoming the President and still he is a Muslim, according to the author of the article “Obama fraud illegitimate usurper president smashing the American constitution” [1]  

Christian Priest says Obama is not a Christian:  

The Youtube has produced seven video-clips where Rev. Don Hamer of Christian Anti-defamation Commission clarifies seven reasons explaining – Why Obama is not a Christian [2] Had Obama been officially converted to Christianity, he would certainly have filed a defamation suit against Rev. Hamer, alleging his propaganda malicious. In one of the videos Rev. Hamer says that in a certain occasion Obama had said that “The evening call to Islamic prayer (or azan) is the prettiest sound on earth.” According to Rev. Hamer, it is impossible for a Christian to say that, because that call for prayer contains such phrases as “Allah is the greatest (thrice), there is none but Allah to be worshipped, Muhammad is the Prophet of Allah and so on …” and all these words contradict the Christian belief. For a Christian, Jesus Christ is the savior, not Allah and Muhammad cannot be the prophet of a Christian. [2]  

Rev. Don Hamer  

In another occasion, Obama said, “Jesus is a historical figure for me, and he’s also a bridge between God and man, in the Christian faith.” When asked whether he will born again, Obama said, “Yes, but I retain a suspicion of dogma … I think that religion, at it’s best, comes with a big dose of doubt….I don’t presume to have knowledge of what happens after I die.” But according to Rev. Hamer, all these words of Obama contradicts what is written in the Bible, particularly in John 6,42 and 6,47. [2]  

Obama’s entry into White House is a terrorist attack:  

In the previous article, it has been claimed that, Obama’s entry into the White House is also an Islamic terrorist attack, which could be far more catastrophic than 9/11. In fact, a criminal complaint against Obama has been filed with the FBI, that says Obama is involved in the conspiracy of a bio-terrorist attack in the USA using deadly swine-flu virus. Experts estimate that, such a weapon of mass destruction could kill millions of innocent Americans [3].  

It has been mentioned in the previous article that Obama glorified Islam in his Cairo speech. In fact, the speech he delivered was written by Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the chief think-tank and planner of the Ground Zero Mosque, in the guise of an Islamic cultural center [4]. What motivated Obama to get his speech written by the Imam Feisal. The reason is very simple. They are playing the same game of Islamization of America. While commenting on Obama’s pro-Islamic speech in Cairo and his bowing down before the king of Saudi Arabia, a reader commented, “He (Obama) forgets that his job is to serve and protect America not pandering to Islamic countries.”  

Obama bowing to Saudi king  

It has been mentioned above that, Obama’s becoming the president of the US is a terrorist attack and is the outcome of a great conspiracy. But it is really unbelievable that more than 80% of the Americans do not think at all, about this development. Regarding this conspiracy, Ali Sina, in his recent article “On The Ground Zero Mosque”, writes, “The Saudi and the Iranian regimes spend large sums of money buying the loyalty of politicians and the academicians in the west. The western supporters of Islam are not often mere useful idiots. In many cases they are well paid traitors.”  

He also says, “An example that comes to mind is the US congressman Mark D. Siljander who began his career as a zealous evangelical Christian and then went on to write a book, A Deadly Misunderstanding, to “bridge the Muslim-Christian divide.” He argued that Christian and Muslim religious texts are surprisingly compatible, when studied in their original languages. This is of course a blatant lie.  

The truth came out on July 7, 2010, when Siljander pleaded guilty to two counts of receiving money from Muslims and supporting Muslim terrorists. /He was indicted in January 2008 on charges of money laundering, conspiracy and obstruction of justice.” So it is needless to say that the Saudi and the Iranian governments and the governments of many other Islamic countries have spend fabulous amount of money to the said useful idiots and paid traitors of the US to raise an Obama wave during the campaign of the Presidential election in January, 2009. [5]

Barack Obama was born in Kenya:  

In the above mentioned article Obama fraud illegitimate usurper president smashing the American constitution, appeared in the website Australia Islamist Monitor, the author says that the birth certificate, Barack Obama submitted during his nomination was entirely fake. The author also says that he was not born in USA and hence he is not qualified to be a president of the US. “Of course if Obama was born outside the US he is NOT eligible to be president”, the author says. In this context, it should be mentioned that there are so many documents to show that he was born in Kenya, including a taped interview with his grandmother, who said, “I was present when he (Obama) was born in Kenya.” Even the Kenyan ambassador asserted that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, and all government and hospital records relevant to Obama have been SEALED by the Kenyan government. [1]  

Fake birth certificate submitted by Obama  

Democrat and former Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Phillip Berg, filed a case against Obama’s eligibility in 2008. He claimed a Kenyan birth and listed witnesses and a recording, anomalies with the later registration in Hawaii and confusion over the claimed hospital, and that Obama could NOT be a US citizen. He notes that in Indonesia, both Obama and his mother would have become Indonesian as Indonesia at the time didn’t allow dual citizenship. Obama was listed for school as Barry Soetoro, Indonesian of Islamic faith. When Obama’s mother returned to Hawaii 4 years later, she would need to swear an oath of allegiance to the US to regain citizenship as would Obama at 18 (had he been a citizen initially which seems unlikely). There is NO evidence either swore such allegiance. [1]
More importantly, to suppress the truth, he says that his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records have been lost. He will not release his Harvard records, his Columbia College records, or his Occidental College records – he will not even release his Columbia College thesis. All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and he claims his scheduling records during those states years are lost as well. In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahau School, he attended in Hawaii. So, “If he cannot provide irrefutable evidence that he is a ‘natural born citizen’ then he must be removed from the presidency before he destroys the American constitution and America”, says the author [1]. Muslims in non-Muslim countries: 

 It has been mentioned in an earlier article that the concepts like nation, nationality, patriotism etc are absent in Islam and it divides all the countries in the world into two categories namely ‘dar-ul-Islam and dar-ul-harb. Dar-ul-Islam means those countries which have already come under the domination of Islam. At present, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Lybia etc. are the examples of dar-ul-Islam. In these countries, Islamic governments or rule of Islam with Sharia law has been firmly established and the kafirs have been totally massacred, or converted to Islam or turned into second grade citizens. 

The literal meaning of dar-ul-harb is the land of warfare. It refers to those countries which have not yet been conquered by Islam and where the Muslims are fighting with the kafirs to bring them under their control. That is the reason why these countries are called land of violence and blood-shed. The ultimate aim of Islam is to turn the entire world into a dar-ul-Islam, or to bring the entire world under the banner of Islam. So, it becomes evident that this goal would be reached only when each and every dar-ul-harb on the earth would be converted into a dar-ul-Islam. Hence the Koran says, “Go on fighting against them till the rule of Allah is not established” (8.39). 

 So,each and every Muslim, including Barack Obama, who lives in a dar-ul-harb, is not loyal to that country. He is loyal firstly to Allah, secondly to Allah’s messenger Muhammad and Allah’s revealed book Koran, thirdly to the holy places Mecca and Medina, and finally to the Islamic Umma or International Muslim Brotherhood. Therefore, each and every Muslim of America, including Barack Hussain Obama, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, Mike Ghouse etc cherish the desire in core of their hearts, to conquer America for Islam and to rule that country and thus, to replace the present Judeo-Christian culture of America with the Arabian religio-political and cultural order. Or, in other words, they aim to turn America into a dar-ul-Islam, or a colony of Arab religious imperialism.
In fact, Islam is a non-spiritual political creed. It is not a religion, but a political party and each and every mosque is its party office. And most of all, these mosques are Islamic military outposts. The religious address (khutba) delivered by the imams of the mosques after the Friday prayers are nothing but violent jihadi and political lectures. So, as a religious group, the Muslims are politically more conscious and active than other religious groups. As a result, as soon as Muslims in a non-Muslim country could sense that the ruling government or the ruling political party is greedy for their votes and has adopted the policy of Muslim appeasement, they start bargaining to squeeze out as much benefit as possible from that ruling party. And they go on demanding unjust financial, religious or any other benefits and concessions from the government, because they know that government would bow down to their most unjust and illegal demands for their votes. At the same time, they intensify unlawful and criminal or jihadi activities because they know that the government would turn a blind eye to these activities for their votes. In this way, they are determined to carry out such violent jihadi activities till the US is turned into an Islamic country. 

What President Obama wants: 

There is no doubt that President Obama, being a Muslim, cherish the desire in the core of his heart to turn USA into a dar-ul-Islam and that too, in the quickest possible time. As a Muslim, it is his pious religious duty to do what Allah has said in his religious book Koran. To turn a dar-ul-harb into a dar-ul-Islam, Allah as commanded the Muslims to wage war or jihad against the despicable kafirs and said, “That you believe in Allah and His Messenger and that you strive hard and fight in the cause of Allah with your wealth and lives” (61.11). 

“Jihad is better for you than your sitting back at home and if you do so, He will forgive you your sins, your foulest deeds and admit you into the gardens of eternity (paradise)” (61.12). “There is nothing in the sight of Allah which may be equated to jihad.” (9.19) and 

  “No equal are those believers who sit at home (except those who are old and disabled) and those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and lives in the cause of Allah” (4.95). 

As a Muslim, President Obama is well aware of these dictates of the Koran, but time has not yet been ripe to start an all out jihad. But situation favourable for starting a full fledged jihad is to be created. And as first step, Muslim population is to be increased. The present statistics says that, Islam is the fastest growing religion in the US and African Americans, particularly the black convicts in jails are accepting Islam in droves. At the same time, mosques, Islamic schools (madrasas) and jihadi training centers are growing up like mushrooms everywhere in USA. 

The site of the Ground Zero mosque  

Obama endorses the Ground Zero Mosque:  

President Obama is also aware that, if a 13 storey mosque, in the guise of an Islamic Center called Cordoba House, as planned by the Cordoba Initiative, under the supervision of Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, could be erected at Ground Zero, the Islamization of USA would advance by a step further. So, on August 13, he endorsed the said Ground Zero Mosque. A report “Obama Endorses the Ground Zero Mosque” [2] Said, “President Barack Obama announced today that he endorses the building of a mosque and Islamic center only blocks from Ground Zero in the Manhattan borough of New York City. Though a recent CNN poll shows that 68% of Americans believe the location is disrespectful to those who died in the September 11 attack and do not want the mosque built there, Obama marked the Muslim holiday of Ramadan by making his announcement of strong support of the mosque being built there.”  

On Friday, Aug 13, while speaking at an iftar dinner held at the White House, Obama said, “As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country.” He also said: “And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community centre on private property in Lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances.”  

Obama U-turns from his stand:  

But he was forced to backtrack over his enthusiastic support for the building of a mosque near Ground Zero in New York, on the next day, due to three main reasons. Firstly, an opinion poll revealed that more than two-thirds (68%) of Americans are opposed to building a mosque at ground zero. So if he proceeds to build the mosque, by ignoring the public opinion, his Democratic Party may suffer a humiliating defeat in the next Senate Election scheduled to be held on November 2, 2010, for 37 of the 100 seats in the United States Senate.  

Secondly, an opinion poll has revealed that, 1 in 5 Americans See Obama as Muslim. The poll released Thursday, on August 19, by the Pew Research Center indicated that only 34 percent of people know the president is Christian. A larger number – 43 percent – say they are not certain what religion Obama practices. Mr. Obama’s faith has long been the subject of Internet rumors. During his run for president, his detractors occasionally questioned the significance of his middle name “Hussein”. But that controversy has now overtaken by strong belief that he is a Muslim, on the basis of his self confessions that he is a Muslim in many occasions as mentioned above.Thirdly, he had to reverse his opinion regarding the mosque at ground zero due to a sharp decline of his popularity. A report “Obamas job approval rating dips to 44 per cent”, appeared on August 18, in The Statesman, a Calcutta based daily, said, ”The job approval rating of US President Barack Obama has dipped further to a new low of 44 per cent for the week of 9 to 15 August, the latest Gallup poll has said. The drop in Obama’s weekly average was driven by particularly low ratings near the end of the week, with record-low three-day rolling averages of 42 per cent for 12-14 August and 13-15 August polling.”
“Prior to this weekend, Obama’s three-day low had been 44 percent. Additionally, Obama’s disapproval rating reached 50 per cent for the first time in the 13-15 August average,” it said. Obama visited Florida’s Gulf Coast over the weekend as part of a vacation with his family, while his comments about the construction of a mosque near ground zero in New York City became a much-debated topic in the news media and on the Internet. “As is usually the case, the impact of these or other news events on the President’s approval ratings is difficult to disentangle,” the report added. 

So, on August 16, Obama took a U-turn:from his endorsement of erecting a 13 storey mosque, in the name of an Islamic Center “Cordoba House” a few yards away from the place where the most dreaded terrorist attack took place on September 11, 2001. But there is no doubt that, as a Muslim, Obama would continue his efforts to the said mosque into a reality. 

 *************************************
References:
[1] http://islammonitor.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3611:obama-fraud-illegitimate-usurper-president- smashing-the-american-constitution&catid=205&Itemid=59 

[2]`Why Obama is not a Christian 7 part video (www.defendchriatians.org)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4cMB8ktCT8 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHlelAui5fs&feature=related 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEYeDGOW83I&feature=related 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzpvlY9BVrY&feature=related 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kA9D9_x9bgY&feature=related 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQMqylEt-Rw&feature=related 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxHdDQDgxQ0&feature=related 

[3] http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=536870  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7JkwFMtDt0 

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/26034/_1_Criminal_charges_filed_against_Obama_WHO_and_UN/ 

 [4] Imam Rauf Boasts that He Wrote Obama’s Muslim Speech in Cairo – Atlas Shrugs.flv  

  

[5] http://www.faithfreedom.org/articles/jihad-articles/ali-sina-on-ground-zero-mosque-cordova-house/  

via Conflict of Conscience between Muslim Obama and President Obama, Part 2. 

Obama issues order preventing use of lawful interrogation techniques against jihadists

This article was published last year and now it is proven fact that all technic are fair game in getting information out of terrorist..I support all the means necessary for our security forces and police to get the information out..

Sam Hindu

Obama issues order preventing use of lawful interrogation techniques against jihadists

And closing Gitmo within a year.

From our growing Not An Auspicious Beginning file: “Obama Issues Directives on Detainees, Interrogation, Guantanamo,” from fFOX NEWS   , January 22 (thanks to all who sent this in):
WASHINGTON — President Obama, putting his executive pen in his left hand to overrule eight years of Bush administration policy, signed “several” executive orders Thursday, including ones affecting national security and abortion.

The national security orders mandate that interrogation techniques in the Army Field Manual be used by all intelligence and law enforcement services; call for a task force to look at closing the detention center in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, within the year; and order a strategy be developed for handling detainees in the future. The presidential directive also orders a stay in the case of Ali Al-Marri, the only person being held by the military as an enemy combatant on U.S. soil.

The executive order says everyone in custody should be questioned under the Army Field Manual, which is intended for honorable combatants, meaning POWs in a military conflict. The rule would prevent trained interrogators at the CIA from using lawful interrogation techniques against terrorists who have been trained to withstand Army Field Manual techniques.

According to sources in the law enforcement community, the executive order on interrogation does not declare “enhanced interrogation techniques” to be tortured; the order is silent on that.

“This allows for a lot of flexibility, a lot of wiggle room,” said one source.

While the administration has insisted on one interrogation standard, one source says they are thinking about assembling a group within the next 60 days to make recommendations on a set of separate techniques for the intelligence community to use.

White House counsel Greg Craig acknowledged late Wednesday that the administration will have to establish a panel to make recommendations to address intelligence community concerns.

Separately, according to a draft of the Guantanamo order, “the prompt disposition” of detainee cases should “precede” the closure of the Guantanamo Bay prison. Whether that means the detainees have to be tried if possible before the closure is still unclear….

Where will they put them? Anyone volunteer to put one of them up?

Is Obam is one of the Jihadi who is protecting them ? is a question to be answered..

Bow Obama

Related Articles

• Suspect grilled at CIA prison gave clue – Wilkes Barre Times-Leader (news.google.com)
• Bin Laden Death Reignites Waterboarding Battle (abcnews.go.com)
• Waterboarding detainees yielded clues that helped find bin Laden: CIA (theglobeandmail.com)
• Did Harsh Interrogation Tactics Lead To Bin Laden? – NPR (news.google.com)
• Osama death revives debate on torture (hindu.com)