“America ‘s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure ” ; Barack Hussain Obama

Some Times By ; Sam Hindu

Mr. Barck Hussain Obama,

This is what you said 4 years ago.

From Barck Hussain Obama’s mouth:

“The fact that we are here today to debate raising America ‘s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the US Government cannot pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies. Increasing America ‘s debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that, “the buck stops here.’ Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.”

 ~ Senator Barack H. Obama, March 2006

Today In your inauguration you are saying

“Obama argued that the nation’s entitlement programs make America stronger because they protect this chance at equality. “We recognize that no matter how responsibly we live our lives, any one of us, at any time, may face a job loss, or a sudden illness, or a home swept away in a terrible storm,” Obama said. “The commitments we make to each other–-through Medicare, and Medicaid, and Social Security–these things do not sap our initiative; they strengthen us. They do not make us a nation of takers; they free us to take the risks that make this country great.”

 The country cannot succeed if a “shrinking few” succeed economically while the middle class suffers.

Now you are In charge for whopping Four years and you don’t care about spending or Debt. ( Hummm.. Scratching my Head)

Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian.

Mr Bow Nobama you said  ”  After my election I have more flexibility,” Obama told then Russian president Dmitri Medvedev.

Now we as Citizens of this country did not hear one word about Jobs and How America would be a Leader and Strong Economically and military. 

 How will gay rights and “climate change” help the 8.3 MILLION US Citizens who dropped out of the workforce during Obama’s first term find JOBS?

Related articles

• Obama ’06: Raising the debt ceiling means America can’t pay its bills; Obama ’13: Not raising the debt ceiling means America can’t pay its bills (hotair.com)
• Daily Quote 01/01/13 (youviewedblog.wordpress.com)
• Obama Really Wishes He Never Gave This Speech About The Debt Ceiling (businessinsider.com)
• Quote of the Decade (veteran-patriot.com)
• Beating Obama At His Own Game (athomesense.com)
• Muslim Ideological Council: Obama to be named “Caliph of Muslims” “Mullah Barack Hussain Obama” “Allama Obama” (atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com)
• Obama Warns: ‘Increasing America’s Debt Weakens Us Domestically And Internationally’ … In 2006 (mediaite.com)
• Guess who said THIS!! (opinionsarefree.wordpress.com)

You’ll Likely Be Fired If Obama Is Re-elected

CNBC.com Article: CEO to Workers: You’ll Likely Be Fired If Obama Is Re-elected

David Siegel told his 7,000 workers that “people like me who made all the right decisions and invested in themselves are being forced to bail out all the people who didn’t.”

Full Story:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/49356069

Pakistan on the Brink by Ahmed Rashid: review

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/bookreviews/9214669/Pakistan-on-the-Brink-by-Ahmed-Rashid-review.html

Pakistan on the Brink by Ahmed Rashid: review

By Duncan Gardham Last Updated: 12:26PM BST 23/04/2012
Ahmed Rashid’s new books reveals a Pakistan crippled by poor leadership, says Duncan Gardham

As Britain desperately tries to rescue some pride from its imminent withdrawal from Afghanistan, the best-case scenario may be that we leave behind a less stable and more corrupt version of Pakistan.

The vision of that country painted by Ahmed Rashid, one of the leading analysts of the “Af-Pak” relationship, is not an encouraging one. “Pakistan is now considered the most fragile place in the world… It is the most unstable country and the most vulnerable to terrorist violence, political change or economic collapse,” he writes in his latest book, Pakistan on the Brink.

While it is not yet a failed state, Rashid admits that its multiple long-term and short-term problems seem “insurmountable by the present military and civilian leadership”.

Among the myriad problems are the corrupt and rundown bureaucracy, judiciary and police force and an elite that “lacks all sense of responsibility towards the public, refuses to pay taxes and is immeasurably corrupt”. There is no drinking water for a third of the population, no electricity for up to 16 hours a day and half the school-age children do not go to school, meaning “young men face a future of little promise and are ready to sign on to jihad”.

The judiciary is a “broken instrument incapable of handing down judgments to the real criminals” and retired intelligence officers spread conspiracy theories and blame America on a plethora of high-octane chat shows.

Meanwhile, the West cannot afford to continue the fight in Afghanistan and the question is, in the words of one anonymous Western ambassador, “will there be an Afghan army and civil service to take over when we leave, or will we just switch off the lights?”

Even if you’re optimistic the Afghan state will still be a “basket case” dependent on receiving more than $8 billion (£5 bn) in aid each year, Rashid points out.

Pakistan is not much better, having sought bail-outs from the IMF 11 times since 1988 and completed just one of their programmes (under General Pervez Musharraf in 2001) and remaining dependent on $4.8 billion (£3 bn) in foreign assistance. Debt servicing and defence take up 60 per cent of the Pakistani budget and growth was just 2.6 per cent last year, compared with around 7 per cent next door in India.

Pakistan on the Brink follows on from where Descent into Chaos (2008) – on David Cameron’s summer reading list for his shadow cabinet – left off. It provides a much-needed update on what has happened in Afghanistan and Pakistan over the past four years, particularly the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, the rapid breakdown of the US relationship with Pakistan and attempts to make peace with the Taliban.

Rashid is as critical of President Barack Obama’s approach to Afghanistan as he was of President George W Bush in his last book. It was clear that the US gambled on Hamid Karzai losing the 2009 presidential elections and by the time he won, the relationship had disintegrated almost beyond repair.

“Handling a wary president preoccupied with keeping his own head requires a personal touch,” Rashid says of his old friend, before adding that “Karzai was his own worst enemy” who failed to accept that corruption undermined his legitimacy.

The problem is that the leadership in Pakistan is no better. “For too long the military and the political parties have neglected their one single task, which is to make life better for their people,” he concludes.

Rashid’s thesis is that the military is in the driving seat, deciding policy, in both Pakistan and Afghanistan, to the detriment of both nations. That ignores the theory that the military is, in the words of one analyst, “the only institution that really works in Pakistan”, as well as Nato’s Herculean efforts in Afghanistan.

Nevertheless, if Pakistan follows its present chosen path – a “paranoid insecure” state which uses “extremists and diplomatic blackmail” – it will, he warns, “lose everything in Afghanistan”.

This excellent book summarises the challenges faced by both countries – although the solutions are difficult to see. A former Daily Telegraph correspondent in Pakistan, Rashid has an eye for the big picture as well as a journalist’s nose for detail.

Pakistan has enormous latent goodwill and expertise in a generation of young Britons with their roots in Pakistan. Like their neighbours across the Khyber Pass, they have spectacular natural beauty, plentiful natural resources, a strategic position for trade, an evocative history and a people with eyes that sparkle with untapped potential – if only their leaders had more vision.

Pakistan on the Brink: the Future of Pakistan, Afghanistan and the West

by Ahmed Rashid

256pp, Allen Lane, £18 (plus £1.25 P&P) Buy now from Telegraph Books (RRP £20, ebook £20)

Arrogance of being President while being Black

Arrogance of being President while being Black

This is an excellent article written by a someone who is realistic (and happens to be White).The very last paragraph says it all.

A little long but worth the read to the end

AUTHOR UNKNOWN but it is all over the web.

ALL I CAN SAY IS WOW!!!!!

Arrogance of being President while being Black

I don’t think anyone was under some real illusion that the election of Barack Obama actually means the end of racism in America . I’m pretty sure that the president-elect knew it better than anyone. After all, he saw it every day, from the moment he announced his candidacy. To some degree, he saw it within his own party during the primaries. And he saw it in all ugliness during the general election. For half of this country, he was “That One”. No matter how big and clear his victory was. No matter how smart he is. No matter how decent he is. No matter what a true patriot he is. No matter how optimistic and positive his vision for America was. All that didn’t matter. Because at the end of the day, he was still black.

I’m quite old. I remember, vaguely, where my parents were on November 22, 1963. I’ve seen so many presidents. Some were feared, some were hated, some were adored, some popular and some not. But all of them, without exception, were treated with the highest respect deserving the office of the president of the United States .

That is until a black man won the right to occupy this office. It’s been 13 months now, and in the eyes of so many, Barack Obama is still that one. He is being disrespected and at the same time being held to the highest standard of any president I’ve ever seen – and not just by the Republican side! He has to perform three times better than any president in history, and even that may not be enough.

For the media, he is many more times just “Obama” than “President Obama”. They create scandals out of nothing issues. It took them at least 6 years to start giving Bush a small part of the shit he deserved. It took them 6 months to begin crap all over Obama because he’s yet to fix the catastrophe that was left for him.

They use condescending tones when they talk about him, and only mildly less condescending when they talk TO him. With anyone else, CNN wouldn’t dare go to commercials every time the president speaks, like they did during that summit on Thursday. They wouldn’t dare be counting how many minutes George Bush or Bill Clinton were talking. Chris Mathews wouldn’t dare make an issue out of Ronald Regan calling members of congress by their first name, like he is not actually the president. They fully cooperate with the Right-Wing smear machine when it comes to president Obama’s national security performance – even if almost every independent and military expert actually thinks that he’s a terrific Commander-in-Chief. You’ll never see them on TV, and virtually no one from the Left, in congress and outside, defend the president on this matter.

I don’t care about the Far-Right. They’re just crazy ignorant Neanderthals. It’s the way the beltway and the mainstream treats this president that is shocking. On Thursday, almost every Republican had no trouble interrupting him in the middle of a sentence. They looked like they’re going to vomit every time they had to say “Mr. president”. They all had this Eric-Cantor-Smirk whenever he spoke. Then they went out and started to spit their stupid talking points, to the delight of the media. Sarah Palin, a woman who can hardly read, thinks that he was “arrogant” towards John McCain, and somehow this is an important news. Because you see, “Obama’s Arrogance” is the talking point of the day.

Oh, those talking points. He is arrogant (because he knows the facts better than all of them combined). He is an elitist (because he uses big words that they don’t understand). He is weak on national security (because he actually thinks about the consequences). He divides the country (well, he did that the day he had the audacity to win the election). Worst of all, he actually thinks that he’s the president. He even dared to say so on Thursday. How arrogant of him. You’d think that previous presidents didn’t have any ego. Somehow it turned out that the one president who treats even his biggest opponents with the utmost respect – is the arrogant one. I wonder why?

I expected that his winning the Presidency would bring out some ugliness, but it’s been far worse than I imagined. The racism coming from the Right is obviously clear and shameless, but there’s also some hidden and maybe subconscious and disturbing underline tone behind some of the things that I read here and throughout the Left blogosphere, even before the end of Obama’s first year – ‘He’s weak, he’s spineless, he’s got no balls, primary him in 2012′. It’ll be dishonest to deny that.

The fact is that for millions in America , Barack Obama is this uppity black man (Not even a “real” black), who received good education only due to affirmative action, and has no right to litter the sacred Oval Office with his skin color. They just can’t accept the fact that the president is a black man, who unlike his predecessor, was actually legally elected. But what’s really sad is that it’s not just the fringe, its deep deep in mainstream America .

Barack Obama’s ability to remain above all this slob, to keep his optimism and his strange and mostly unjustified faith in people, while continuing to gracefully deal with an endless shitstorm – is one of the most inspiring displays of human quality I have ever seen. And I can only hope that the Cosmos is on his side because God is and He never makes a mistake.

Sometimes, they make me feel ashamed to be a white man!!

Related articles

• Blacks’ Dilemma with Obama (papundits.wordpress.com)
• Obama: Arrogance on Tour (via Kingsjester’s Blog) (loopyloo305.wordpress.com)
• White House Insider: The Obama Plan – Part Three (socyberty.com)

Ali Sina Speaks and World Listens.

This interview was originally posted on ThouShallNotBearFalseTestimony.com

One of the most outspoken critics of Islam around the world these days is a Canadian man, Ali Sina, who is formerly a Muslim himself. He runs the Faith Freedom International movement. Ali Sina has some highly controversial positions concerning Islam and American president Barack Obama as well and he has recently come out with a book, Understanding Muhammad, which continues to stir things up. I found this man to be extremely provocative as well as interesting so I asked him for an interview so that he could share his own insight as to what Islam is at base and what is going on in the world today. The communication flowed as follows…

Gary Dale Cearley: Could you let us know a little about yourself and your background?

Ali Sina: I was born in a Muslim family. Today no one in my immediate family is a Muslim and I know that many of my extended family that is still living in Iran, like most Iranians, have either left Islam or are in the process of doing so. Many Iranians have just ceased to believe in Islam.

Since childhood, injustice harrowed my soul. I became vegan because cruelty pains me. Scenes of cruelty affect me profoundly. They still do, as they did when I was a child. Many young people react to injustice by becoming revolutionaries. They choose violent means to combat injustice and hence bring more injustice and violence to the world. I prayed to become an instrument of peace. To bring love where there is hate; understanding, where there is confusion; peace, where there is discord. That was of course all wishful thinking, when I myself was confused, trapped in a bubble of lies.

I pondered upon injustice and I believed it is caused by greed. Later I came to understand a lot of evil is committed, because of beliefs in evil doctrines. To quote Blaise Pascal, “Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.”

When I read the Quran, the whole meaning of Pascal’s words became apparent. It was then that I decided the time for prayer is over and the time for action has begun. Of course this awakening did not happen overnight. It took me two years of study, inner fight and soul searching. I was taken from denial to shock, and then to guilt and to confusion, to depression and to anger and finally to enlightenment, forgiveness and inner peace. It was an arduous odyssey, but worth making.

I started writing about my findings on the internet and more enlightened ex-Muslims joined. Our little trickle became a torrent and now we are a movement, bringing about a silent revolution, not with violence, but through understanding, by explaining the unexplained and spreading knowledge.

We have helped thousands of Muslims to discover the fallacy of Islam and join the rest of humanity in amity. My childhood prayer has come true. I have become an instrument of peace and I am not alone. We are now a legion that has risen to demolish the darkness of ignorance with the light of knowledge.

Gary Dale Cearley: You have written a book, Understanding Muhammad: A Psychobiography of Allah’s Prophet. Tell us about it.

Ali Sina: The book, as its title says, delves into the motives behind the actions of Muhammad. Muhammad is an enigma. He did many things that make one believe he was sincere. He gave the impression that he believed to be a prophet, while at the same time he was ruthless, cunning, and evil. So how can you explain this oxymoron? Was he a liar? If so how could he be so convinced?

In my book, Understanding Muhammad, I give a brief account of his biography. Muhammad’s life story is covered in many books and one can learn it from original sources called Sira. The concern of my book is the psychology of Muhammad.

Understanding Muhammad does not focus on “what,” but rather on “why.” Instead of narrating what Muhammad did or say, it explains the mental impulses that led him to act in the way he did.

I have shown that Muhammad suffered from a series of morbidities, mental, and personality disorders that collectively explain the phenomenon known as Islam. Once you understand the psychological makeup of Muhammad and the milieu in which he operated, you’ll come to see that Islam was almost inevitable.

The book does exactly what it claims. It makes the reader understand Muhammad and Islam. It has received encouraging reviews. Sam Vaknin, the author of Malignant Self-love wrote, “Understanding Muhammad offers an explanatory scheme. One “a-ha” moment chases another as things fall into place and a causative chain emerges leading all the way from medieval founder to his current day followers and emulators.” Once you read the book, you’ll not only understand Muhammad, but Muslims too.

This book has been read by many Muslims, who first wrote to me to prove I am mistaken. I challenged them to read the book and now many of them are my strong allies. I believe once the insight that this book offers spreads, Islam will become history and with it Islamic terrorism will ceases to exist.

Gary Dale Cearley: As you have become apostate in the eyes of Muslims, I am interested in what kinds of threats have you had from the Muslim community and from where have the threats come?

Ali Sina: When you leave Islam threats come from all directions. Your apostasy offends every Muslim who will each attack you in their own way. Some Muslims want to kill you but not every Muslim is a murderer. Those who do not issue a death threat snub you, pity you, and vilify you. I was informed that there are two fatwas to kill me from two mullahs in India. There was also a price put on my head: One million rupees. This is only $20,000 dollars. I was a bit disappointed. I thought I am worth more, but hey, it is more than 30 silver coins for which Christ was sold.

Gary Dale Cearley: What changes have you undergone within your own family since you renounced Islam?

Ali Sina: Not much really. My family was not fanatical. We were among those deluded believers who think Islam means peace and the terrorists have got it all wrong. It was quite a surprise for me to read the Quran and see that it were we who got it all wrong and the terrorists are just doing what a good Muslims is supposed to do.

The majority of Muslims belong to this category. They are deluded and think Islam is peaceful. They condemn the so called extremists. However, the truth is that the extremists are the ones who understand Islam best and the moderates don’t. The moderates believe in a benign form of Islam that is made up by them and has nothing to do with the Islam of Muhammad.

Gary Dale Cearley: Are you open with Muslims about having turned your back on Islam as a religion?

Ali Sina: I am not in contact with them anymore.

Gary Dale Cearley: If you could come face-to-face with Osama Bin Laden and Ayman Al Zawahiri, what would you like to tell them?

Ali Sina: The only message I would like to deliver to those beasts is a bullet in their sculls. My message to all Muslims is that Islam is a lie and they should not kill people or sacrifice their own lives for a lie. Not all Muslims are terrorists, but they all harbor distrust, if not hatred of non-Muslims, to the extent that they practice Islam.

Esfandiar Rahim Mashai, former vice president of Iran, with Pope Benedict XVI
 Islam is a faith that is built on hate. Without an enemy Islam loses its raison d’être. A good example to make is what happened recently in Iran. Ahmadinijad, the man who stole the elections appointed [Esfandiar Rahim] Mashai, a relative by marriage, as his vice president. Mashai’s nomination angered the hardliners and Khamanei was humiliated his own handpicked and protégée president and ordered him to dump Mashai. Why? Because last year Mashai said, “Iranians are friends of all people in the world — even Israelis.” He was serving as vice president in charge of tourism and cultural heritage at the time.”

By making this comment, even though he really did not mean it as he is part of the Islamic regime and shares the same hatred of Israel, Mashai had undermined the legitimacy of the Islamic republic that is founded on hatred and needs perpetual enemies for its own sustenancef. Not only that, he also undermined the legitimacy of Islam that is founded on hatred of non-Muslims and particularly the Jews. Islam needs enemies to survive. The hatred must be kept alive. Sigmund Freud wrote in Civilization and Its Discontents, “It is always possible to bind together a considerable number of people in love, so long as there are other people left over to receive the manifestations of their aggressiveness”

Muslims are united, as long as there are non-Muslims to hate. But once among themselves they will start fighting over who is a true believer and will target their hatred towards those who interpret Islam differently. As long as Islam is believed to be a religion of God the hatred will continue and the killing and wars will not end. So, really there is no other option but to expose the fallacy of Islam and wean Muslims from Islam.

This message cannot be heard by hardened terrorists. This message is for ordinary Muslims who don’t know the truth about Islam, who will be shocked to learn it. This mass of moderate Muslims is the backbone of Islamic jihad. The Jihadis come from these very ordinary Muslims and are supported by them both morally and financially. If we can make these Muslims see the truth Islamic terrorism will end.

Islamic terrorism is the fruit of Islam. It’s the tree that has to be eradicated. As long as this tree is in place it will continue to produce bitter fruits.

Gary Dale Cearley: How has the non-Muslim community accepted you?

Ali Sina: There is no problem with the non-Muslim community. Non-Muslims do not have the concept of “us vs. them” that is so intrinsic in Islamic psyche. I live in Canada. We are a nation of immigrants. We are all equals and asking someone about his or her religion is considered to be rude. No one cares what you believe. In Canada I am just another Canadian.

There are Muslims who feel alienated in Western countries. That is because they choose not to integrate. They want to wear their backward Islamic clothing, cover their women in black bed sheets, eat differently, act differently, think differently and denigrate the culture and the country where they live. It is natural not to be accepted if you are obnoxious. We have large communities of Hindus and Sikhs in Canada that are fully integrated, and are the backbone of the Canadian economy while Muslims, coming from the same neck of the woods, do not integrate. It is their fault that they don’t integrate. Western countries are open to all and sundry. People here are not prejudiced. They are learning to dislike Muslims and who can blame them?

Gary Dale Cearley: What advice do you have for Barack Obama and other leaders of Western nations in dealing with radical Islam?

Ali Sina: My advice to Barack Obama is to pack up and seek refuge in Kenya before Americans discover you are a fraud and a traitor.

This man is on a mission to destroy America. Polls show Americans are waking up and are realizing the big mistake they have committed. Obama is in office not because of his merits, but because of the white guilt. He hated America all his life. Tell me who are your friends and I will tell you who you are. Who were the friends of Obama? Jeremiah Write, Bill Ayer, Louis Farrakhan, Rashid Khalidi, Tony Rezko, and a bunch of other goons!

Who were his mentors when he was growing up? The pedophile Frank Marshal Davis and the black supremacist Malcolm X! I do not give advices to the enemies of America.

However, if America had a legitimate president, my advice would be ban Islam and make the practice of Sharia illegal.

During the Cold War America banned communism because communism was a threat to the Constitution of America. President Truman introduced the Federal Employee Loyalty Program (FELP) in 1947 aimed at combating security risks from working for the Federal Government. Every person taking on a new job in the civil service or government had to be investigated.

Congress set up the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) that investigated Communist involvement in the film industry, education, unions and the government. A couple, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were convicted of espionage and selling nuclear secrets to the Soviets during the WW2 and rightly were executed. Yes, excesses were also committed. But it is a mistake to condemn America’s resolve to fight against its internal enemies because of those excesses.

Abdul Qadeer Khan made the “Islamic Bomb” possible…
 Maybe because of those excesses Americans have become guilt ridden to the extent that they have lost the will to defend their country in the face of a real threat. Remember how Pakistan got its nuclear bomb? It was because Abdul Qadeer Khan, a Muslim, was allowed to join the staff of the Physical Dynamics Research Laboratory (FDO) in the Netherlands and from there he stole the technology and went back to Pakistan to build the “Islamic bomb.” Muslims allegiance is only to Islam. You cannot trust them in sensitive jobs.

This July the Islamic extremist organization Hizb-ut-Tahrir, (Liberation Party) hosted its first organized conference in the United States, titled “Fall of Capitalism and Rise of Islam.” The conference, attended by 700 people, was hosted in Hilton Hotel in Chicago. Amazingly Hilton rejected an event featuring Geert Wilders, the Dutch parliamentarian that is fighting against Islamic expansion in the Europe. The goal of Hizb-ut-Tahrir is to overthrow the governments of the world and establish the caliphate, allegedly through non violent means. This group is banned in most Islamic countries, but it is allowed to operate in the USA and to openly promote the abolition of the American Constitution.

These people are right here in America and are given full immunity to plot the destruction of America. If there was a patriotic president in office, I would have told him to ban all Islamic groups that work against America and its constitution. But we don’t have a patriotic president. We have a racist man who hated America all his life and is doing everything he can to weaken its Judeo-Christian base and open the floodgate to Muslims. His bow and genuflection to the Saudi King, the head of the Wahhabi school of Islam should tell us everything about where Obama’s loyalty lies.

Anyone with commonsense knows that Islam is in war with America. What does Obama do? He appoints two devout Muslims to Homeland Security Posts.

Arif Alikhan, Assistant Secretary for Policy Development at the Department of Homeland Security
 Arif Alikhan is a devout Sunni Muslim. As assistant secretary for the Office of Policy Department of Homeland Security, Mr. Alikhan was instrumental in taking down the LA Police Department’s plan to monitor its Muslim community. He is affiliated with MPAC, the “Muslim Public Affairs Council”. This is like putting the fox in charge of the hen coop. Americans must prepare themselves for more terrorist attacks and the responsibility falls on Obama and of course every one of those who voted for this traitor.

Now, I don’t blame Obama. He is doing what he had dreamt to do since his youth and that is to destroy America. My wonder is at Americans who have handed their country to a buffoon enemy. Obama is not an intellectual. He is stupid. Obama lied and he deceived the gullible people. That is where narcissists excel. They are charming and convincing liars. We all commit mistakes. But why now that the truth has come out and it is clear that this impostor is working against America he is not sacked? Obama is not a legitimate president. Don’t let the biased lame stream media fool you. Facts are out there for those who care to study them. Obama should be brought to justice, tried and preferably electrocuted for high treason.

Anyway, back to your question: America has to confront Islam, recognize it as a hostile ideology and educate the public of the threat that it poses.

Gary Dale Cearley: Lots of people, from the man on the street to sociologists to politicians, have expressed concern regarding the growth of Muslim immigration to the West. Should they be concerned and if so what concerns should they have?

Omar Ahmad of CAIR
Ali Sina: Yes, they should be concerned. Muslims are not like other immigrants. They don’t want to integrate in your melting pot, but to conquer the country through demographic and warfare. Let us hearken to Omar Ahmad, Co-Founder of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, who said

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faiths, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth…”

“Fighting for freedom, fighting for Islam, that is not suicide, …They kill themselves for Islam.”

If you found this post interesting and would like to receive updates by e-mail then click here to register to receive my new posts!

Bin Laden: A criminal & Terrorist like Mad Mohammad killed at last

Image by SS&SS via Flickr

Bin Laden: A criminal killed at last

5/2/2011

Osama Bin laden was killed yesterday through a secretive U.S operation inside Pakistan. The evil havoc Bin Laden brought to the world stretches back two decades.

His death brings a somber relief to thousands of victims who, because of him, suffered the loss of someone deer to their heart. Parents lost beloved children. Children lost a dear father who would have grown up with them playing ball and making treasured memories.

Lone bread winners of families died because of that despicable thug and mass-murderer.
What the public media won’t tell you is that Bin Laden’s actions are founded in Islam. His belief system is no more than an attempt to bring back the years of early Islam to life again.

Let’s face it, Bin Laden is a product of Islam through the educational system of Saudi Arabia. Saudis pride themselves as the bearers of the “Light” (Evil Darkness!!) of Islam. Most of the 9/11 hijackers who destroyed the twin towers were Saudis. They were an immediate product of the Islamic educational system of Saudi Arabia.

Killing Bin Laden, while just and worthy, is not the major obstacle to liberty, freedom, and civic equality amongst citizens of the world. The major obstacle is Islam as embodied in educational systems like those of Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, and every other country that called itself Islamic. It is here that we can see an image of the beast that needs to be slain at the altar of liberal democracy and human dignity.

Related Articles

• White House: Osama Bin Laden is Dead (benzinga.com)
• Osama Dead (spinelessliberal.wordpress.com)
• Osama bin Laden Killed in Pakistan (538refugees.wordpress.com)

Barack Hussein Obama ? PATRIOT or MUSLIM

---

---

Eligibility resolution
nears

---

Posted: February 17, 2011
1:00 am Eastern

© 2011

If anyone has a right to be frustrated and demoralized about the eligibility
issue, it is me.
For nearly three years, I have stuck my neck out on it, devoting massive
news-gathering resources to unwrapping Barack Obama’s real-life narrative,
endured abuse as a “conspiracy theorist” and “wacko” only to see my news
organization still standing virtually alone.
Ironically, I’m not discouraged at all about getting resolution to this
controversy. In fact, I believe it is right around the corner.
I can understand the reason for the discouragement of others. They’ve watched
court case after court case dismissed. They’ve watched an officer and a
gentleman by the name of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin go to prison for trying to get
at the truth. They’ve witnessed their majority views of skepticism
about Obama ridiculed and marginalized. They’ve seen a near blackout of media
coverage of the real issues of constitutional eligibility.
But what most people have not yet noticed is that judgment day is near.
Nearly
a year ago, I spelled out how this issue would be resolved no later than
2012.
Today, I can honestly and enthusiastically say, “See, I told you so.”
Jack
Cashill’s literary investigation uncovers revelations galore about Obama’s
alleged life narrative. Order the new book “Deconstructing Obama: The Life, Love
and Letters of America’s First Post-Modern President”
Back then, Americans were still just beginning to become aware of the many
contradictions in Obama’s life narrative and the fact that there was no
meaningful evidence of his constitutional eligibility.
Today, at least 58 percent of Americans don’t believe his story – and want to
see real proof.
That is a crisis for Obama. That’s not a fact that will change should winds
of economic recovery blow in his direction over the next two years.
But there’s an even bigger crisis he’s facing in 2012 if he plans to stand
for re-election.
Again, as I
predicted last year, states are approving strict eligibility tests to get on
their ballots as presidential candidates. Back then, I was hopeful four or five
states might make such moves, virtually ensuring no candidate of questionable
eligibility could ever again run for the presidency, let alone assume office.
My prediction, it turns out, was too conservative.
So far, 11 states have introduced such legislation this year alone, with some
of them sure to pass into law.
So be of good cheer, all you crazy “birthers”!
We’re winning.
The system is correcting itself.
The people are having their say.
States are asserting their sovereign rights to conduct free and fair
elections.
It’s all good.
And there really is resolution in sight.

Barry Soetoro  aka Barack Hussein Obama    has not been forthcoming with any of the documents which would shed much light on his early years. When you look at the following list, you will realize one thing: you wouldn’t spend two million dollars to conceal this information from media scrutiny, unless you had something to hide.

Kindergarten records
Punahou school records
Occidental College records
Columbia University records
Harvard Law School records
Passport
Medical records
Files from his years as an Illinois state senator
Illinois State Bar Association records
Baptismal records
Adoption records
Who is Barry Soetoro  aka Barack Hussein Obama ?    PATRIOT or  MUSLIM

Read more: Eligibility
resolution nears http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=264341#ixzz1EKw0jEna

Bow Nobama this is what your brought to USA after Kissing Filthy Islamic ASS.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all Readers of SH.

I was on extended vacation and my friend Rick from PAtriot USA helped me run this Blog so from bottom of my heart I  thank Rick and Hamilton for their contribution.

Though i am back and active let me catch up my work so i can start writing so hang on for cpl of days and i shall put all what i have seen and experienced first hand here via my words and will take all of you on time machine journey through my words…

THANKS A MILLION TO RICK MY TRUE LOST BROTHER FORM PREVIOUS LIFE…

SAM HINDU

 

Somali Islamist insurgents threaten US attack

(AP) –

MOGADISHU, Somalia (AP) — A leader of Somalia’s Islamist insurgency threatened to attack America during a speech broadcast Monday.

“We tell the American President Barack Obama to embrace Islam before we come to his country,” said Fuad Mohamed “Shongole” Qalaf.

Al-Shabab has not yet launched an attack outside Africa but Western intelligence has long been worried because the group targeted young Somali-Americans for recruitment. About 20 have traveled to Somalia for training and at least three were used as suicide bombers inside Somalia.

Al-Shabab holds most of southern and central Somalia and has the support of hundreds of foreign fighters, mostly radicalized East Africans. It seeks to overthrow the weak U.N.-backed government, which is protected by 8,000 Ugandan and Burundian African Union peacekeepers.

The al-Shabab militia launched coordinated suicide attacks in Uganda in July that killed 76 people. It has also announced its allegiance to al-Qaida and is believed to be harboring a mastermind of the twin 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that killed 224 people.

The radio message was recorded in the town of Afgoye, near the Somali capital, during a meeting of Shongole and Sheik Hassan Dahir Aweys, formerly the leader of insurgent group Hizbul Islam. The two insurgent groups had clashed several times previously but announced a merger last week. Aweys said his group will fight under al-Shabab’s command.

“We have united for the sake of our ideology and we are going to redouble our efforts to remove the government and the African Union from the country,” said Aweys on Monday.

In an unrelated development, the Somali information minister said the new Cabinet had approved the use of a private security contractor to train forces in the capital of Mogadishu and the program would start “soon.”

Saracen International would train forces for VIP protection, said Abdulkareem Jama. He said he did not know exactly when training would start, what the men’s duties would include or how many men would be trained but he said the program included the renovation of a hospital and government buildings.

Somali officials are frequently killed by insurgents, both in single assassinations and en masse in suicide bombings and attacks. The Somali ambassador in Kenya previously said that up to 1,000 men could be trained in the capital for an anti-piracy force and 300 for a presidential guard.

Saracen is already training 1,000 men for an anti-piracy force in the semiautonomous northern region of Puntland.

The program has been criticized by U.S. officials who say it is unclear who is funding it, what its objectives are and whether it breaks a U.N. arms embargo.

Jama said the Somali cabinet had discussed those issues and were satisfied the embargo was not being broken but he did not say who was funding the program.

“There is a need for training,” he said. “There was an effort to slow down the project (in Mogadishu) because of those concerns.”

The arid Horn of Africa nation has not had a functioning government since a socialist dictatorship collapsed in 1991. Its position on the Horn of Africa means pirates can use its long coastline to capture shipping.

Analysts fear that al-Qaida linked insurgents are also gaining ground across the Gulf of Aden in the unstable nation of Yemen. If Yemen fell, that would mean failed states on either side of the shipping route leading into the strategically vital Suez Canal, the route taken by a substantial portion of the world’s oil shipments.

Associated Press writer Katharine Houreld in Nairobi, Kenya contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Related Articles

• Somali Islamist insurgents threaten U.S. attack (msnbc.msn.com)
• Insurgents: Obama Must ‘Embrace Islam’ (foxnews.com)

Bow Nobama’s Terrorist Connection

Bow Nobama is right on India, wrong on Pakistan and his terrorist connection by appointing Kathawari of EHAN ALLEN. By M D Nalapat and Sam HIndu   The presence of a very influential pro-Pakistan group within the Pentagon and a pro-China lobby within the Department of Commerce during the Clinton,Bush and now Obama periods have ensured that this blacklisting of India has endured to the present. It was with surprise, therefore, that the Pakistan and China lobbies in the US reacted to President Obama’s promise (made before the Indian Parliament on November 9) to remove India from the so-called “Entity Lists”, and to give the world’s most populous democracy the same status as Germany and Japan.   The Pakistan army is aware that there can be no solution to Kashmir for decades to come,which is why they seek to blackmail NATO by demanding Indian concessions that this alliance is in no condition to enforce. Instead, those Pakistani generals, brigadiers and colonels who assist the Taliban and other terror groups (including the JeM and the LeT) should be subject to the same sanctions as are being applied to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. SIX weeks before leaving for Mumbai, President Barack Obama appointed a Kashmiri furniture dealer from New York, Farook Kathwari, Boycott Ethan Allen Which is supporting Terrorist Jihad. as a member of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Asian American and Pacific Islander affairs Kathwari is a generous financial backer of groups that have sought to integrate Kashmir with Pakistan. His own son left for Pakistan during the Clinton presidency to train as a jihadist. After developing expertise in the handling of AK-47s and the use of grenades, Kathwari Junior was inserted into the Kashmir valley by the ISI (an organisation that has had close and open links to Kathwari Senior since the 1970s), only to fall to an Indian bullet. On getting news of this, Kathwari held a get-together in his New York apartment to celebrate the young man’s martyrdom. All this, of course,was before 9/11 made jihad unfashionable for New Yorkers. Kathwari’s embrace of jihad and collaboration with the ISI’s schemes for acts of violence in India have not stood in the way of this backer of violence in Kashmir developing a close personal bond with Bill Clinton’s team, a warmth that endures to the present. He has repeatedly peppered both the US Congress as well as the US Administration with tracts explaining why the full might of the US ought to be deployed to secure “azaadi” for the Kashmiri people“. Of course, to Kathwari, the “people of Kashmir” comprise only the 780,000 Valley inhabitants who are Wahabbis, rather than the other six million Kashmiris, who are content to remain within India, and who include the state’s Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists, besides the Muslim Shia, Gujjas, Sufi and Bakkerwal community. In the international media and western chancelleries, the implicit assumption made while discussing Kashmir is that the state is comprised only of its Wahabbi minority, a view that geopolitical links between the West and the biggest financial backer of Kashmiri Wahabbis-Saudi Arabia -have only reinforced. Looking through the columns of the New York Times, The Washington Post or the Guardian, one may be forgiven for believing that Kashmir is exclusively Wahabbi,for it is only the views of that minority that get represented in these columns as “Kashmiri” opinion.Our own copycat media follows this trend faithfully. The sharp spike in terrorist incidents in Kashmir during the 2000 visit of (then) President Clinton to India was because it had been the Arkansan’s administration that had pushed and pummelled India for eight years in an effort to force it to surrender control over Kashmir. The jihadis had hoped that the innocent blood that they spilled in grisly terrorist incidents would strengthen their friend Clinton in forcing concessions from the Vajpayee government (which incidentally was nudged by the Clinton team into accepting Farook Kathwari as an “interlocuter” in its Kashmir dialogue, a shameful decision). President Clinton had linked a “solution of the Kashmir problem” to Pakistan’s satisfaction as proof that India was a “mature nation”. Mature enough, that is, to commit suicide. While a US Senator, Hillary Clinton continued her husband’s cosy links to Kathwari and other pro-Pakistan lobbyists in DC, New York, Chicago and elsewhere,and has been known to favour the continuance of the harsh Clinton policy of placing India in the same basket as Iran and North Korea, when it comes to the question of access to US “dual use” ( or hi-tech) items. The presence of a very influential pro-Pakistan group within the Pentagon and a pro-China lobby within the Department of Commerce during the Clinton, Bush and now Obama periods have ensured that this blacklisting of India has endured to the present. It was with surprise, therefore, that the Pakistan and China lobbies in the US reacted to President Obama’s promise (made before the Indian parliament on November 9) to remove India from the so-called “Entity Lists”, and to give the world’s most populous democracy the same status as Germany and Japan. Obama further sweetened his message by placing the US behind India’s bid to become a permament member of the UN Security Council, a policy already accepted by Russia, France and the UK, thereby leaving only China out as the only P-5 (Permanent Five) member not to back India as a permanent member of the UNSC. The powerful trio of Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has been sceptical of what may be termed the “George W Bush line” (or, indeed, the Franklin Roosevelt line) of treating India on par with key US allies. The three have repeatedly pointed to the lack of tact and transparency in India as reasons why the policy concessions announced by President Obama ought to have been denied till “the Indians make substantive concessions”. Robert Gates has followed the advice of key assistants in insisting on Delhi accepting the same conditions for transfer of US equipment that Islamabad does. The difference-be sides the ones obvious to all except Gates and his team-is that the Pakistan side routinely signs agreements that it has no intention of ever keeping, while in India, a nervous bureacracy (eager for its prized UN and World Bank assignments,all of which depend on goodwill from both the US as well as China) ensures that commitments are kept. Had the US Defense Secretary shown a modicum of flexibility in his dealings with India, by now at least two of the three agreements that he has been pressing the Manmohan Singh government to sign since 2005 would have been inked: that on the provision of logistical support,and the other on communications security. In the case of Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, he has developed a fixation with China, an attitude that has led him to neglect the potential for US businesses in India. In common with his Bush-era predecessor, Locke has been pushing India for concessions that would amount to political suicide for Manmohan Singh, such as opening up the retail trade to foreign brands without placing restrictions that protect the 28 million jobs that “kirana” (or small) retail trade provides in India. The US Commerce Secretary has become accustomed to doing business with China, a country where there is no need to consult public opinion before taking a decision. In this irritation with the admittedly more roundabout procedures of a democracy, and in his reluctance to take India off the list of countries that US companies face major hurdles in doing business with, Locke has been on the same page of Hillary Clinton, who has thus far followed the Bill Clinton line on foreign policy, including on relations with India, China and Pakistan. That President Obama did not bring along the Secretary of State on his India tour was an early indication that he was planning to jettison the Clinton policy of giving only minor concessions in exchange for substantive and significant changes in Indian policies. Instead, he has adopted a bold policy of accepting India’s case that this democracy of 1.2 billion people deserves at the least the same treatment as is given to Germany, France and Japan. If the 2008 India-specific waiver at the Nuclear Suppliers Group indicated the beginning of the end of the US policy of boxing India into a lesser category than its main NATO allies, the November 9,2010 Obama speech before the Indian parliament seems to have signalled the start of a “Relationship of Equals” between the US and India. As “equal”, that is, as Japan or Germany are with the US. Two years into his Presidency, Barack Obama seems to be freeing himself of the Clinton fetters that ensured his humiliation in the just-concluded Congressional polls. In his India policy, he has certainly shown that he favours change, and that he has the fire within him to force through that change over the wishes of his India-sceptic troika, Gates, Locke and Clinton. However, if the US-and the entire international community-is to get the benefit of such a re-assertion of Obama over Clinton, President Obama needs to break away from the Afghanistan-Pakistan policy that he has inherited from Bill Clinton and Dick Cheney, that of relying on the Pakistan army to take down the Taliban. That so many in the US cling to such a delusion is not surprising in a country where more than half the population believes that Saddam Hussein was the head of Al Qaeda, when in fact that mishmash of relics spent years seeking to murder him, a task successfully carried out by George W Bush,who thereupon avenged the attempted assassination of Bush Senior by Saddam a decade before he occupied Iraq. Unless the US and other NATO forces remove the imaginary distinction between the Pakistan and Afghanistan Pashtun belt,and treat the entire territory as a single military zone, they will continue to find the Taliban regrouping. The Pakistan army lacks the resilience and the training to take on the Taliban, no matter the extent to which they are stuffed with US weapons. NATO troops need to remove the safe havens from Pakistan by a judicious use of land,air and sea-power. Although this may be opposed initially by Pakistan (especially its military), the positive results within Pakistan society of the elimination of the Taliban will more than compensate for such temporary discord. There is nothing that India can do to make Pakistan more stable, unless Islamabad first allows free trade between the two countries, and opens up hitherto-blocked transit routes.The Obama administration needs to ensure such outcomes The Pakistan army is aware that there can be no solution to Kashmir for decades to come, which is why they seek to blackmail NATO by demanding Indian concessions that this alliance is in no condition to enforce. Instead, those Pakistani generals, brigadiers and colonels who assist the Taliban and other terror groups (including the JeM and the LeT) should be subject to the same sanctions as are being applied to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. They should be arrested if travelling abroad, and their dependents ought to be prevented from foreign travel, as it is more than likely that these may be acting as carriers of instructions and money to terror groups. Unless the Pakistan army feels the pain of backing the terror groups, they will continue to do so. Unfortunately, both the Vajpayee as well as the Manmohan Singh governments have dealt with Pakistan in a very Mahatma Gandhi fashion, with India making all the sacrifices. NATO is going down the same path. Unless it be understood that Pakistan can be saved from implosion only if the military is prevented from backing terror groups, the descent of that country towards extreme chaos will continue. It is not India that can ensure a stable Pakistan but NATO, by enforcing accountability on a military that has been surviving on handouts from the US, China and Saudi Arabia. And what about a stable India? The only way to ensure this is to take ruthless action against the corruption that has pervaded every aspect of governmental operations. The US has excellent ways of tracking money flows. Manmohan Singh needs to ask President Obama to forge a partnership with India that would give access to the results of US monitoring of illegal money flows from India into safe havens such as London, Dubai, Singapore and Macau. These days, too many politicians are escaping the attention of Indian agencies, rendered toothless by the over-tasking that has been a feature of the Chidambaram period in the Union Finance Ministry. The current Home Minister brought in numerous new restrictions and powers “to fight Black Money”. However, he knew full well that each such tightening of the regulatory screw would lead to massive increases in bribes, the reason why Palaniappan Chidambaram is a hero to legions of corrupt officials. Instead, what needs to be enforced is better monitoring, and because so much of the cash is going abroad (often in lorryloads of currency via the Nepal border), the help of the US needs to be taken to identify the major perpetrators. Such help can uncover the fresh deposits being made from India, so that those responsible can be exposed to public scrutiny. A stable Pakistan needs a military removed from jihad. A stable India needs to see its VVIP corrupt in jail. Boycott Ethan Allen Which is supporting Terrorist Jihad.

The Trash of Islam or Islam is a Trash ?

The Trash of Islam or Islam is a Trash ?

via Sultan
Knish a blog by Daniel Greenfield.

 

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2010/11/friday-afternoon-roundup-sore-losers.html

 

The Egyptian city of Cairo, the largest city in the Arab world and the “timeless city” of Obama’s Cairo speech, is suffering from a garbage crisis. The crisis has a very simple cause, the pigs that used to eat the garbage were killed to prevent the spread of Swine Flu. The pigs living in “Garbage City” had served as both organic garbage disposal and food sources for the Zabaleen, families of marginalized Christian Copts who made a living by collecting the garbage, reselling the inorganic garbage and feeding the organic garbage to pigs. The system worked fine so long as there were pigs, but without the pigs, Cairo’s streets are filled with giant mounds of rotting garbage.

It might be shocking for most people to realize that the trash collection system for the largest city in the Arab world, the capital of what passes for Arab Muslim civilization, depended on a class of “untouchable” garbage collectors as young as eight years old, and their pigs to keep the city from drowning in its own garbage. A system that is not simply medieval, but per-medieval, that seems positively Bronze Age. But that is only because the Arab Muslim nations are not actually civilizations in the modern sense, they are post-colonized tribal clumping with bits and pieces of borrowed governmental structures and technology that never quite work right.

And underneath them is something far darker and more primitive, a miserably brutal and ruthless Levantine existence defined not by moral laws, but by tribal ones. And underneath them all are the pigs. Kill the pigs, and the system collapses.

It isn’t just about the piles of reeking trash in Cairo’s streets. The Arab and Muslim world has been exporting far more dangerous forms of waste in the forms of immigration and Islamic radicalism.

Virtually every Arab rulers balances the tension between national allegiance and Islamic law by exporting terrorism abroad, whether it is Arab governments funding suicide bombers in Israel, rabid mosques in Oslo and Manchester or Al Queda hijacked planes racing toward Manhattan– the homelands of Islam have been calculated dumping the garbage they don’t want on foreign shores.

“Don’t fight a civil war, fight a global war”, has been the anthem of the ruling families of Saudi Arabia, the UAE and numerous other Arab Muslim dictatorships, who extend one crooked hand to the West, and another to Islamic terrorists; dumping their exploding garbage in foreign laps.

The more the angry young men with fierce shovel cut beards go abroad, hoping for a shot at an American GI or an Israeli family or a Thai Buddhist schoolteacher, the more the House of Saud Barberia  can take a deep breath, count their oil revenues and buy another piece of Manhattan or London.

What they have developed is a cyclical system, much like Cairo’s pig trash consumption, except this one exports terrorists abroad where they will pose less of a threat to the endless collection of Princes littering up the endless palaces of the oil rich Gulf states. Wonderful – Science of Islamic Hygiene

Meanwhile the rulers themselves get to play moderates, offering their services to help moderate tensions, in exchange for the proper incentives of course. The benefits of the system allow them to live rich off their ill-gotten oil gains, while treating the toxic waste of Islam as an export they can cash in on.

And then there’s immigration.  This is How Moslims Think.. Wake up America.
Wake up America.The West suffers from low birth rates. By contrast the Ummah suffers from an uncontrollably high one. Just enough Western medicine has poured into Muslim countries to help improve infant survival ratios and mortality rates… but the countries themselves are non-Western and can’t even begin to handle the extra population.

With much of their social and economic systems still stratified based on familial and tribal ties, bribe economies discouraging innovation and foreign investment, and long lists of Islamic Thou Shalt Nots, Muslim nations cannot accommodate their growing populations. And so instead they export them to the West.

And who is it that goes to the West? The huddled masses yearning to breathe free. Not quite. Huddled, perhaps. Yearning to breathe free, not so much. Immigration to the West allows the Muslim world to export those who have few opportunities at the bottom of the ladder or the sons of those at the middle or the top who have trouble fitting in.

Very often those are exactly the type of people eager to listen to Jihad audio cassettes and seek out the angriest mosques. The types of people Egypt or Pakistan or Saudi would like to get rid of. Just more waste being dumped on Western shores.

It’s a bad system, but in a civilization whose major city can be overrun by garbage because all the pigs have died, it’s about as reliable as it gets. Muslim rulers export their waste, which the West seems to want, and in doing so by themselves a measure of immunity from Islamic terrorism, while investing in the possibility of a future Caliphate. Getting in on the ground floor of the Death of the West, so to speak. It’s a win-win situation, until the pigs die of course.

From the perspective of the “moderate Muslims” Exposing the Myth of Moderate Islam that we keep hearing so much about, Bin Laden pushed the limit, upsetting the cycle and bringing war into their own backyard. The result overturned the system and broke the cycle. Too much too soon, was the watchword there. The “moderate Muslims” had no objections to thousands of murdered Americans and other foreigners.

What they had an objection was exceeding the allowable tolerances of Americans and other foreigners for terrorism. Their policy has been to build a Caliphate made of garbage, to turn Europe, America, Canada and Australia into towering trash dumps consisting of Islamic radicals and Muslim immigrants. Enough trash to build into minarets, mold and sculpt into Sharia law and bring an end to the West.

And when that has happened, the moderate Muslim regimes of all the terrorists and Islamabad fancy that they might be the ones left standing to take up the Mohammedan Man’s Burden once again.

9/11 endangered their trash deliveries and woke up some in the West to what was being dumped on their front lawns. 7/7 rang even more alarm bells. Islamic conversions went up, but so did the status of people who had been talking all along about the dangers of immigration and Islamic radicalism. Push. Push-back. And with it comes the rising fear of an end to immigration.

And if the Muslim world can’t export its excess populations and Islamists to the West, where will they go? Asian countries might send out their excess populations as labor contractors, but not even Muslim cities like Dubai are too keen on importing fellow Arabs to do the work, mainly because they know quite well that’s a formula for insuring that no work will get done.

And all those angry young men hanging around Cairo and Riyadh, reading tracts about getting back to authentic Koranic truths, and looking over bomb instructions are another kind of formula, a formula for Islamic regime change at home.

In Cairo, the trash piles are beginning to stink. Worms and rats, and worse things have made it their home. The cycle has been broken and there is no way to fix the system. True civilizations are tool users. Muslim civilizations are tool borrowers who layer text messaging and cell phones over institutions that would make the Dark Ages seem positively enlightened.

There is no way such a system can accommodate real change, or provide opportunities for growing populations. There is no way it can do anything but dump the garbage on someone else’s street and run away.

To talk of a Clash of Civilizations is in some ways futile, because there are no Islamic civilizations, only former colonies and splinters of former colonies, run by whoever was left in charge after the British or the French left, or whoever managed to clamber to power since then. And by their close relatives and friends, and by their son in-laws, second cousins and good friends.

They call themselves Presidents, Ministers and Colonels. They have huge bank accounts and large-scale investments abroad. They have a veneer of technology and cultivated manners. But the aerial shots of skyscrapers and urban nightcaps, storefronts and maps are a facade of civilization, like a well-lit movie set. Underneath it all, there are still pigs eating the garbage.

Israel did not win multiple wars only because of its army’s superiority, but because of the inferiority of its opponents, not in a strategic sense, but in their inability to conduct large-scale warfare. Saddam’s forces demonstrated the same inability to use his giant toy box of Soviet arms and tanks in two wars against the United States and its allies.

Nor could any of his neighbors have done much better. Even Saddam himself understood this, and by the second war, fell back on the default tactic that the Arab world has used against Israel for the last 35 years, to go to ground and focus on hit and run raids, on terrorism and guerrilla warfare. To revert in other words to the way of the bandit and the nomad, to shed any pretense of civilization and focus on pure murder and terror. To shed human skin in favor of the savage that had always been lurking underneath.

The rise of Islam is the manifestation of more than just frustration with Western civilization or globalism; but a frustration with their own incompetence at grasping and implementing the structures and achievements of those civilizations at home. Muslims are either terrorists or potential terrorists

Lusting after the glory of a worldwide Caliphate and the imaginary perfection of Islamic law, is the way that those who have failed at aping Western civilization can drown their inferiority complexes in rituals of blood and death.

Inwardly they know that there is no golden collection of Minarets ruled by a wise Caliph waiting for them at the end of the road. The virgins with their raisins are a better bet, because they are a more plausible endgame, than the idea that even a few million Muslims could get along, let alone the whole billion. The dream of a Caliphate wasn’t broken at the gates of Vienna or with the fall of the Ottoman Empire.

It was never real and could never be real, because Arab Islamic civilization had never reached the point where it could run anything that size without a lot of outside help, and could never keep it together without breaking down into infighting because it lacked any political structure besides nepotism and bribery.

Islam has become the magic token, the catchall idea for some higher wisdom that will fix all of the faults of the Muslim world, without its followers having to actually confront social problems and initiate real reforms– and most of all to break out of their rut and actually advance a few runs up the ladder of civilization. Instead Islam wills them to sink deeper still, to toss aside Western civilization while hanging on to whatever choice bits are useful for Jihad, and to answer all difficult questions with the blade of a sharpened sword.

It is no wonder that this form of bloody magical thinking is most popular in the shadow of the West itself, in the suburbs and ghettos hiding from the light, whose denizens are faced with either trying to be something they’re not, or trying to impose their dominance on a civilization, who through the light of faith suddenly appears degenerate and inferior.

The Russians made that same choice with Communism, emerging as a horde to plunder the wealthier and more accomplished nations of Eastern Europe. The Germans made that choice with Nazism to demonstrate their superiority by subjugating all their former enemies and neighbors.

The Muslim world is making that choice again with Islamism. And by treating their trash as if were the finest gold, we are helping them make it. And covering our own streets with the trash of Islam.