If you are reading this article. You are racist.

View @ Life Of Muslim Women

View  @ Life Of  Muslim Women

In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year old and have sexual intimacy with this child, consummating the marriage by 9.

The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman (who becomes his slave) and for the purchase of the private parts of the woman, to use her as a toy. I am a Non-Arab Muslim Scum.

Even though a woman is abused she can not obtain a divorce.

To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses.

Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return the dowry. The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family. Husbands can beat their wives ‘at will’ and he does not have to say why he has beaten her.

The husband is permitted to have (4 wives) and a temporary wife for an hour (prostitute) at his discretion.

The Shariah Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of the woman.

In the West World (America) Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah Law so the wife can not obtain a divorce and he can have full and complete control of her. It is amazing and alarming how many of our sisters and daughters attending American Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly to the Shariah law.

By passing this on, enlightened American women may avoid becoming a slave under Shariah Law.

Author and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the goal of radical Islamists is to impose Shariah law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two.

Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza before emigrating to America in 1978, When she was eight years old, her father died while leading covert attacks on Israel He was a high-ranking Egyptian military officer stationed with his family in Gaza .

When he died, he was considered a “shahid,” a martyr for jihad. His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family an elevated position in Muslim society.

But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her own Muslim culture and upbringing. She converted to Christianity after hearing a Christian preacher on television.

In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping Sharia law – what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries.

For the West, she says radical Islamists are working to impose Sharia on the world. If that happens, Western civilization will be destroyed.

In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.S. to elect the President! I think everyone in the U.S. should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!

Why Palestinians Are Not Palestinians

Why Palestinians Are Not Palestinians
As a Muslim who was born and brought up in Saudi Arabia, one of the main goals in my life had been to become a martyr while fighting the Jews in Palestine (or Hindus in Kashmir, depending on where I was). If there was one belief that I held on to, which was as dear to me as it was lie. was that the land that the Zionists were living in was the land of Muslims and it must return to the sons of Islam.

Secondly, I held on to the belief that the Jews never had any right to the land; that because they hated Muslims, and were conspiring to conquer all Muslim lands and subjugate us, they had started with Falasteen. And the evil Jews didn’t even stop there. In 1967, as if they hadn’t already taken away enough from my Palestinian brethren, they occupied Al Quds.

After that, as the Jews and their lies go, they claimed to have been in Al Quds for the last 3000 years. They claimed they had made a temple there in the time of Solomon but we all had already been informed that there had never been a temple there, just Solomon’s Palace called the “Haikal-e-Suleimani” or “Haikal Suleiman”—either way, there was no temple and had never been.

 The Jews, on the other hand, were and had always been the most vicious of liars and the worst of enemies to the Ummah of Islam.

That is what I grew up with. Just for clarification, Falasteen is Arabic for Palestine and Al Quds is the Arabic name for Jerusalem.

Then, when I was about sixteen years old or so, I lost faith in the self-centered, victim-playing, brainwashing, and bloodthirsty politico-religious ideology of Islam. When I was a Muslim, it was as if my brain had been put in a straitjacket, and when I lost faith in Islam, it was as though my brain broke free for the first time in my life. I could think freely and question everything and anything I wanted to.

It was when I realized my brain’s potential to process information and then judge whether it was factual or not that I thought, “well, wait a minute, if Islam is not true then it is also possible that what Muslims say about others isn’t true either”, or something to that effect. It was thoughts like that that I came about my study of the so called Falasteenis, or Palestinian people.

Instead of starting with my own boring thoughts and words that seem to go on endlessly, I will just try to quote different people over the history who have used the words Palestinian or Palestine. Here we go:

There is no such country as ‘Palestine’; ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented!

Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi to the Pell Commission in 1937

It is common knowledge that Palestine is nothing but southern Syria.

Ahmed Shuqeiri to the UN Security Council in 1949

Jordan is linked to Palestine by a national relationship and a national unity forged by history and culture from earliest times. The creation of one political entity in East Jordan and another in Palestine would have no basis either in legality or as to the elements universally accepted as fundamental to a political entity.

Declaration of the 8th Palestinian National Congress

Jordan is Palestine and Palestine is Jordan, and Jordan hails every Palestinian who seeks to do his duty to his cause and his country.

The Jordanian Foreign Minister (Adwa’min pp. 4-5)

There are no differences between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. We are all part of one nation. It is only for political reasons that we carefully underline our Palestinian identity, because it is in the interest of the Arabs to encourage a separate Palestinian identity in contrast to Zionism.

 Yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity is there only for tactical reasons. The establishment of a Palestinian state is a new expedient to continue the fight against Zionism and for Arab unity.

Zuheir Mohsein, Member of the Supreme Council of the PLO

Palestine and Syria are one homeland. The Arab people will win by the
sword; the victory will be won by the Jihad of the Arab world.

Abdul Malik Dahamshe, an Israeli Arab Knesset member,
 at a solidarity visit in Damascus, Syria [David Makovsky, Jerusalem Post,
January 24, 1995]

There is no difference between one Palestinian and another. We are all
Palestinians and we are all Syrian Arabs.

Arab MK, Abdul Darawshe [Jerusalem Institute of Western
Defence, Bulletin 3, August 15, 1997]

Above are several statements over the years by Arabs who mentioned Palestine or Palestinians. Most of these statements reveal what Arabs really think about the term. Everyone knows that there never existed a Palestinian people but now there seems to be a need to shout out to the world, “Oh give these Palestinian people their land”. My question is, “Where are the Palestinian people that we should give them their land?”

The words, Palestinian people, are used in the media and at the UN so much now that we have forgotten that there was a time when Arabs actually protested against the use of these words to describe them.

 They did not want to be called Palestinians, they wanted to be called Arabs or better yet, Syrians. Take a read of the following:

The above quotes are from the book “JEWS” by George E. Berkley. I have to be honest that I have not read the whole book. The only reason I even know about this book is because of its chapter 32 (that’s where the quotes are from, pages 287, 292-293) and the only reason I know about that is because it is really hard to find other books that talk about this history in as clear terms as George E. Berkley did in his chapter 32.

 There are other references, if anyone is interested, but they are all scattered. This was the only place I found where I could read it all condensed in the form above.

Now, of course, that does not conclude my article. I will put my boring thoughts here, just a bit. I have said this for years, Jordan is Palestine, Palestine is Jordan. Arabs have their country, they should move there and stop whining. Jordan, or Transjordan as it was called, only came about to make Arabs happy.

 They got what they wanted, they need to stop asking for more. In fact, in 1948, they could have gotten more but they wanted it all to themselves so they rejected the whole proposal.

Why is it that so many these days have forgotten what happened a mere 70 years ago. Forget 70 (for if people have found it easy to forget the Shoah, I don’t expect them to remember what happened around the time Israel was born either), but they have forgotten what happened a mere 40 years ago, or 20 or 10. It is easy to always side with the wrong and popular, I think and hard, and sometimes impossible, to stand with what is right.

Today the whole world is living the lie that Arabs created 40 years ago; that they are a Palestinian people whose land it is that the Jews have stolen. This is what is taught in history books and this is what is accepted as the most accepted version of the truth. You deviate from it and you’re just wrong, doesn’t matter what the facts are, you’re wrong!

Before I finish (and to stop myself from ranting on), I want to add another point. History shows us that there were people that called themselves Palestinians. But history also shows us that those people were anything but Arabs. Consider the following letter written to the New York Times in 1975 (it was later printed in The Palestinians: A Political Masquerade, Published by Americans For A Safe Israel by Arthur Kahn and Thomas Murray):

Dear Sir:

Your newspaper frequently uses the term “Palestinian” to describe a section of the Middle East population which is Arab, to differentiate it from Israeli Jews. As the holder of a Palestinian Identity Card and a Certificate of Discharge from a Palestinian Unit of the British army, I find this practice annoying and certainly untrue.

We Palestinian Jews wore the uniform of the British Army, and on our shoulder epaulettes the single word, “Palestine” in English. We tried to get permission to wear Hebrew insignia, fly the Jewish flag and be recognized as Palestinian Jews, but-no, Palestinian meant Jew and Arab, and who cared if there were fewer than 3000 Arabs as compared to 36,000 Jews in khaki? In British army nomenclature, the equivalent of a GI is BOR, meaning British Other Rank. We were formally known as POR , Palestinian Other Ranks.

So we fought the war as Palestinians, set up the Jewish Brigade as Palestinians, and I’ll be damned if I agree that only Arafat and his assassins are Palestinians.

As a Palestinian, I was arrested by the British on suspicion of smuggling immigrants into the country. As a Palestinian, I had the honor of commanding the 329th Palestinian Companyof the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers (all Jews). There were no equivalent Arab units. Once a British general said to me, “Migawd I have so many things to dislike you for, for being a Jew, American born, a Palestinian-and you don’t even know how to handle a knife and fork!

So cut it out, please. Call them what you will, but not Palestinians.

Yours truly,
 Joe Criden

Labels: Palestinians

posted by Avenging Apostate at 9:38:00 PM permanent link#

Epaminondas said…
 The term is a canard to represent a political convenience so that no muslim will ever admit to jewish sovereignty over any muslim land, let alone Al Quds

That is the total extent of the existence of such a people. They exist only to fulfill this purpose

FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2011 10:43:00 PM
 Pastorius said…
Great post, my man.

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2011 2:25:00 AM
 Alexander Münch said…
Yes AA, indeed ! Great Post ! Bravo !

Just one correction and one note if I may ;

Firstly, tell Pasto that you are MY MAN !…

Please note, that all Nations, Languages, Cultures and so on, did not exist at some point in History !
They all appeared ‘suddenly’ on the World’s stage – “Miraculously”. Each one has a tradition explaining their CV and purpose in life !
 The fact, that ALL of them disappeared at a certain moment in History is very well known ! What is less known or remains as a total Enigma, are the reasons for their “Disappearance” !
It was not The Azteca’s tradition to extract the hearts out from their victims while still alive that brought their downfall !
Very few Americans know what really made their nation great ! Most of them believe that it was the Gun powder!
I say, it was the “Mule Trains” and the trains that followed !
I saw somewhere on the WEB, that there are about 6000 languages on our planet ! About the same number already vanished ! Today, the rate of disappearing languages ( cultures ), reached the frightening number of one NATION per WEEK! It was most refreshing to hear, that a new “Stone Age” tribe was discovered in the Amazonas a couple of weeks ago ! Nice looking people, healthy, smart and above all HAPPY ! In a year time from now, Sociologists and Anthropologists will say :- “Darwin did his job”!… Shit !

Back to the Palestinians…

As you very well know, The population of Israel, consists of more than 20% non Jews ! The total number of people who call themselves ‘Palestinians’, floats between 5-7 millions world-wide ! And yes, I do remember what Golda said about them ! I also remember Ariel Sharon in Gaza during the early 70′s ! ( I was there ! ) The last thing Ariel Sharon did in Gaza was, evacuation of the Jewish Settlers from there because “The things you see from ‘Down there’ have different dimensions when you are ‘Up there’ !”

The Israeli – Palestinian ( Arab ) conflict will come to constructive solution, once the Muzoids among them will realize that Israel’s existence is the ultimate manifestation that Darwin was right ! Nature acts in two way ! The violent way ( see Christchurch ) and the Mysterious way ( see Israel ) !!

God be with you !

Alex.
.

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2011 6:17:00 AM
Epaminondas said…
Alex I never realized you were a flower child optimist.
“The Israeli – Palestinian ( Arab ) conflict will come to constructive solution,”

Sure, just like ole Jeffy Davis.

All it will take is for Damascus, Teheran, Baghdad, Ankara, Constantinople, Cairo, Alexandria, Aswan, Amman, Beirut, the Bekaa, Riyada and that other city they have, Sanaa, and a few more locales to look like Richmond and they MIGHT see the light.

Of course, Israel can do it.

I wonder if anyone wonders at what it means that it is not done?

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2011 12:22:00 PM
 Alexander Münch said…
 Epa,

Now I know where you got your Apocalyptic view on life !…

===” A faint hot breeze began to stir from the southeast, scattering burning embers through the streets and alleys and houses. Powder magazines and arsenals let go with a whooshing boom. Thousands of bullets and shells tore through buildings and ploughed up the streets. Shells exploded high in the smoke cascading a metal spray over the area, followed by the rattle of bursting cartridges in one great metallic roar. Just before daybreak a deafening explosion from the James River signaled the destruction of the Confederate warships and the Navy Yard. “===

http://goo.gl/Pq1Nl
.

I am a Non-Arab Muslim Scum.

April 21, 2011 By Agniveer

Kindly review What does Agniveer stand for to understand the overall perspective behind any article on Agniveer site. Thanks.  (NOTE: For commenting and discussions on this article, please visit http://satyagni.com/4091/i-am-a-non-arab-muslim/. 

 I am a Muslim Scum. A proud Muslim Scum. But I am not Arab. I represent the entire non-Arab Muslim Ummah (community). I am the ‘black’ Muslim of Zanzibar.

I am the ‘brown’ Muslim of Indian sub-continent which is the largest congregation of Muslims in the world. I provide the largest population base as well as intellectual leadership to Islam.

I am home to greatest scholars and volunteers of Islam. And yes I am indeed proud of who I am. A Muslim. Worshipper of Allah and his great last Prophet Muhammad. I live for Islam.

I shall die for Islam. I have laid my life for Islam. I can even take life for Islam. I was not always a Muslim. Some 1400 years ago, I was just a human being. My forefathers had been following Judaism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism and Hinduism.

In the Indian subcontinent, I had been following the oldest religion of humankind. I had been doing so for generations since time immemorial.

If human civilization is 10,000 years old, I was Hindu for 10,000 years. If it is 100,000 years old, I was Hindu for 100,000 years. If it is 1.97 billion years old, I was Hindu for 1.97 billion years.

But then something changed. And I rejected what I was following for thousands/millions/billions of years! The change was not easy. It is difficult to change habits of only a few years. And here, I was changing my very lifeline since inception of humanity!! The change was a tough one.

But I went for it despite enormous challenges and sacrifices. For this change, looters from Arab killed my father and brothers. They raped my mother and sisters. They conducted mass carnage of my community. They continued doing it for centuries.

And then, for sake of my mother, my father, my sisters, and my brothers – I rejected my foundation. I became a Muslim. I consoled myself that the time of change has come. I had no options. The only solace lied in following the path of the Prophet of Equality.

And only then could there be peace in my family. Those were the most tragic, most bloody, most depressing, most agonizing chapters of my life. So brutal was their impact that I refused to even look into my history so that the old wounds do not revive again.

I deluded myself in a history of grandeur where Allah had destined an awakening of mine towards path of truth so that I can achieve Heaven and enjoy the 72 virgins.

Whatever happened was for good – to save me from eternal Hell fire. These ideas gave me lot of comfort. I rationalized everything that happened with me. I empathized with my invaders and showed example of Stockholm Syndrome in real life.

So much so that I have today completely forgotten my history. Today even when somebody reminds me of those harrowing experiences, I refuse to take them seriously. I scoff it all off as tales of fiction propagated by anti-Islamic elements and conveniently ignore the most evident facts of history.

I do so because past is past. I don’t care about that. I want to take pride in my proud present and glorious future. My eyes no more shed tears of blood, my heart no more pounds, and my sleep no more disrupts when I see flashes of my gory past suddenly in my dreams.

I have made the greatest sacrifice to be a Muslim. Islam was not served on a platter to me. No Prophet came and talked to me directly. No angel came from Heavens. No revelation was downloaded.

I instead destroyed everything that was my foundation for ages or whatever I loved or cherished or was proud of…only to become a proud Muslim. I can bet that no one in history of humankind has made a sacrifice of similar enormity.

And I did it with one single solace – that being a Muslim would make me equal in status and opportunities in entire Islamic Ummah (community) of world. Not that my Vedas did not teach me equality. But lets not discuss past. I don’t want to remember all that anymore because I fear that may trigger those emotions that I have very painfully suppressed for ages. I just want to delight in the pride of being an EQUAL Muslim.

I want to be happy that all Muslims – from whatever geography, community, race or color that they may belong to – all equal in all respects. This ALONE is my source of pride. In fact I feel that with all the sacrifices I made, I am the most honored Muslim in the entire Ummah.

I have not read Quran properly because Arabic has always been a foreign language for me. Even Arabic scholars have not been able to understand Quran properly; then where do I stand in one single small life? There is no way to verify veracity of Last Prophet, Heaven, Hell, Judgment Day, Gabriel, Kaba mystery, Id story and other assumptions that form foundation of Islam. But how does it matter?

I care least about it and even if I cared, it still does not matter because neither I can understand Quran properly in one life, nor can Prophet come in my dreams to bring me revelations. The only reason that I am Muslim is because I am told that it offers me Equality.

I am told that Islam offers me a dignity and status that is same for all Muslims across the world. I am told that in Islam – you are either ‘one of us’ or ‘one of them’. If you are one of us – Muslim – then we treat you with equal respect and rights.

Only when you are one of them – non-Muslim or Kafirs – then we refuse to pray for Heaven for you even when you die or refuse you the right to preach your own beliefs in a Muslim country. Thankfully, I am ‘one of us’.

As a Muslim, I am told that I am not a slave of anybody except Allah. I am told that no race or tribe can dominate me or treat me as inferior. This is the only reason why I am a Muslim. And I know that I am the most respected Muslim because I made the greatest sacrifices for Allah. This is the sole foundation of Islam for me. And if this does not exist, there remains no reason why I should still follow a foreign religion in a foreign language propagated by foreigners whom I don’t even understand properly.

So far, I believed blindly whatever I was told. I kept deluding myself in my own palace of pride. But then something happened and the foundation slipped.

Have you ever suddenly woke up from a beautiful dream because you felt like you slipped?

My Matrix also broke suddenly and new realities emerged. I fell in love with an Arab girl. But then I came to know that 1. Arab men can marry my daughters and sisters but I cant marry theirs Now I realized the Islam in practice.

The Sharia Law of Saudi Arabia is against marriage of Arab women with non-Arab men. In most parts of Arab society, the father can simply deny to a proposal for his daughter from a non-Arab.

Yes, it is true that non-Arabs are considered inferior Muslims. In my case, the story ended with refusal of her father. I was humiliated for daring to marry an Arab woman!

My friend was luckier but had to face more turmoils. Her fiancee was able to convince her father to agree to the marriage proposal. To marry a non-Arab, a special permit was to be obtained from government.

The laws are different and much more encouraging in case an Arab wants to marry a non-Arab woman. The permit took more than a year. And after that, the husband was refused residency.

On contrary a non-Arab wife easily gets the residency. The ordeal was so torturous that finally they decided to leave Arab forever and settle in Canada where Shariat is no more applicable.

You can read about their miseries at: http://arabnews.com/saudiarabia/article30078.ece http://www.altmuslimah.com/a/b/a/3664/

I initially tried to reason it out as not a religious issue but a national issue. However when I scratched the surface, my foundation broke completely. Islam was no more the same for me.

Kafaa’at in Lineage ….the Fuqahaa (Jurists) have stated that among Arabs, a non-Quraishi male is not a match (Kuf) for a Quraishi woman, nor can any person of non-Arab descent be a match for a woman of Arab descent, no matter that he be an Aalim (religious scholar) or even a Sultan (ruling authority).

[Sources: http://www.shariahprogram.ca/women-islam/kafaah.shtml and http://www.islam.tc/cgi-bin/askimam/ask.pl?q=6225&act=view ] The hoax of equality was now exposed.

I suddenly realized that this is nothing but slavery where Muslim males can enjoy any of their slaves whom their right hand possesses but any male from the slaves can never be the match to master’s women/sisters/daughters.

So as per Shariat and practice, non-Arab Muslims have same status as slaves. The real Islam is for Arabs alone and non-Arab Muslims are merely being fooled to fulfill their political ambitions in garb of religion. THIS WAS THE MOST SHOCKING REVELATION OF MY LIFE.

 I don’t know how  Muhammad would have felt when he first got the revelations. But for me, this reality was far more shocking and gruesome than the violent history that led me to embrace Islam.

I did not want to give up so easily. I still had faith in Religion of Equality. So I went down the rabbit-hole further. And I was destined for some even more rude shocks. 2. Arab Muslims call Non Arab Muslims as “Mawali” This word Mawali used by Arabs for non-Arabs is same as the one used in Indian subcontinent derogatorily as “Gunda/Badmash”. Though in Arabic, it means “heirs” as per Islamic scholar Ibn Kathir, but it was used exclusively to mean ‘slaves’ for centuries.

This is how the word got its prevalent meaning in this region. The famous Shiite Islamic scholar Mumtaz Ali Tajddin in his “Encyclopaedia of Ismailism” writes- The Shi’ites from Iran were not granted equal status by their Arab co-citizens in the social system of Kufa, and thus they were called mawali (sing. mawla) means clients, a term to indicate inferior social standing, or second-class citizens. [Ref: http://ismaili.net/heritage/node/10590%5D So if not Kafir, I am a Mawali. Instead of calling me a pig, they call me swine!

After all that sacrifice I made to embrace Islam, this is the equality that I received. I was just a puppet in hands of Arabs all the way. I could not face myself in mirror anymore.

I had my family butchered, I had my mothers and sisters raped, I had my traditions destroyed, I refused even to relook at history, and loved my own Qatil (murderers) – all to earn the title of ‘Mawali’ and be termed inferior to their breed!

But now I decided to review the history. I reviewed the available Quran translations and tafseer (commentary) by noted scholars and I found that 3. Arabs converted Non Arabs into Islam by tying them in chains on their necks Quran [3:110] says- “Ye are the best of peoples, evolved for mankind, enjoining what is right, forbidding what is wrong, and believing in Allah.”

In this verse, Arabs have been called as best of peoples ever. Many of the Muslims can argue here that “Ye” in this verse has come for Muslims in general and not for Arabs only.

But their argument gets flattened when we look into the description of this verse by Ibn Kathir in Tafsir, it says- “You, Muslims, are the best nation of people for the people, you bring them tied in chains on their necks (capture them in war) and they later embrace Islam.” This description needs no further clarification.

It clearly separates a nation of believers from those of unbelievers whom the formers used to force into Islam by tying them in chains on their necks (capturing them in war).

Thus every tribe/people/nation which was converted to Islam through sword of Jihad was/is actually the slave with their necks tied with chains like cattle and dogs. Now I knew why I was a ‘Mawali’.

I could never be a true Muslim because I was not born as an Arab. I am actually only a slave who has embraced Islam after having been treated as animals and hence eternally inferior. Thus to distinguish between the masters and the slaves, the term Mawali was/is used. 4. Ummah of Muhammad was made best among all I always thought that Ummah (Muslim community) of Muhammad is the group of all Muslims in the world and not Arabs alone, so there is no supremacy of Arabs over others in this claim.

But to understand what “Ummah” actually means, I went back to Quran [14:4], which says- We sent not a messenger except [to teach] in the language of his [own] people, in order to make [things] clear to them. Now Allah leaves straying those whom He pleases and guides whom He pleases: and He is Exalted in power, full of Wisdom.

This verse unequivocally states that any group of people gets the messenger in its own language. It means that Quran and Muhammad both being Arabic were sent for Arabs alone. If Quran was meant for non-Arabs,

it would have been sent in vernacular languages and not in a language that hardly anyone understands in non-Arab world. The Ummah of Muhammad was comprised of Arabs alone. Quran [3:110], as shown earlier, claims that Arabs are best of peoples, evolved for mankind. This way all non Arabs are left with no option but to obey the commands of the best of peoples-

Arabs.  Perhaps Mad Mohammad wanted to guide only the Arabs and never even thought of global expansion. But after his death, his followers misused his message. And for generations non-Arab Muslims like me have been fooled despite all our loyalty.

5. Quran and Muhammad were sent for Arabs only The Mullahs would shout on top of their voice that Quran and Muhammad are the final book and final messenger of Allah respectively sent for whole mankind.

However just have a look at these verses 1. Had We sent this as a Qur’an [in the language] other than Arabic, they would have said:

“Why are not its verses explained in detail? What! [a Book] not in Arabic and [a Messenger] an Arab?”… [41:44] 2. We have made it a Qur’an in Arabic, that ye may be able to understand. [43:3] 3.

…Say: “I am commanded to worship Allah, and not to join partners with Him. Unto Him do I call, and unto Him is my return.” Thus have We revealed it to be a judgment of authority in Arabic. …[13:36, 37] 4. [It is] a Qur’an in Arabic, without any crookedness [therein]: in order that they may guard against Evil. [39:28]

5. A Book, whereof the verses are explained in detail;- a Qur’an in Arabic, for people who understand;- [41:3]

6. If [We had] not sent thee to the Quraish/people of Mecca,- in case a calamity should seize them for [the deeds] that their hands have sent forth, they might say: “Our Lord! why didst Thou not sent us a messenger? We should then have followed Thy Signs and been amongst those who believe!” [28:47] 7. Had We revealed it to any of the non-Arabs, And had he recited it to them, they would not have believed in it. [26:198, 199]

Thus Quran was not supposed to be for non-Arabs in first place. However being large-hearted non-Arab Muslims interpreted these verses to imply ‘entire humanity’ despite obvious contradictions.

After all this equality was our only hope. We naively forgot that Quran itself says that the revelation applicable for us is that sent in our own language by our own people. Were we fools to reject our own texts and heroes and embrace a foreign revelation which we don’t even understand and was forced down our throat by those who claimed racial superiority over us? This question stirred my soul. And Arabs take these verses still differently! They claim exclusive rights to Islam based on these verses and simply use Mawalis like me as tools for their political agenda.

I also realized that Prophet did not want Quran to be followed by non-Arabs in first place. Had that not been so, why would he have asserted that non-Arabs could not have believed in Arabic Quran even if it were revealed to them? (Refer Verse 7 above). And that is why Arabs are convinced that despite their loyalty up to death, non-Arabs cannot understand Quran! Quran is for the Arabs by the Arab prophet.

Non-Arab Muslims can only read the translations- the man made stuff. That is why we – the non-Arab Muslims – are ‘Mawalis’. That is why we are inferior to their race. 6. Caliphate sealed for Arabs only, Non Arabs can only be loyal servants to Arab masters I will not comment about Islam of Prophet Muhammad.

But the Islam of today is nothing more than a political agenda for racial superiority of Arabs. That is why, as per Islam, the ruler of Muslim Ummah – the Caliph should be a Quraish (Arabic tribe which Muhammad belonged to). Any Non Quraish can never dream of becoming Caliph because Quraish are born rulers and Non Arabs are born slaves Sahih Bukhari 8.82.817: …After a pause he (Abu Bakr) said, ‘O Ansar! You deserve all (the qualities that you have attributed to yourselves, but this question (of Caliphate) is only for the Quraish as they are the best of the Arabs as regards descent and home, and I am pleased to suggest that you choose either of these two men, so take the oath of allegiance to either of them as you wish.

… Sahih Bukhari 4.56.704: …Beware of such hopes as make the people go astray, for I heard Allah’s Apostle saying, ‘Authority of ruling will remain with Quraish, and whoever bears hostility to them, Allah will destroy him as long as they abide by the laws of the religion.’

“ Sahih Bukhari 4.56.705: Narrated Ibn `Umar: The Prophet said, “Authority of ruling will remain with Quraish, even if only two of them remained.“ Thus, howsomuch loyal a Muslim I become, howsomuch Zakaat I pay, howsomuch Deen I follow, howsomuch strong my leadership skills be,

I cannot become Caliph of Muslims. A Yazeed who killed Prophet’s kins can become Caliph, his children can become Caliph, but not an Indian or Pakistani or Bangladeshi or Indonesian or African or European Muslim. We will just remain ‘Mawalis’.

Our job is to blindly follow what our Arab rulers say – because only they are the blessed ones to have received Allah’s last message in their own language – and work for propagation of Islam so that an Arab can tomorrow become a Caliph.

7. Only seventy thousand seats available for Muslims in heaven, will those be filled by masters or slaves? Non-Arabs cannot even find consolation in hope that eventually after Judgment Day, Allah will grant them 72 virgins in Heaven forever for dying as Muslims, as claimed by Mullahs.

Because even the seats of Heaven have been already booked by these Arabs as per Sahih (True) Hadiths. Sahih Bukhari 8.76.550: Narrated Abu Huraira: I heard Allah’s Apostle saying,

“From my followers there will enter Paradise a crowd, seventy thousand in number, whose faces will glitter as the moon does when it is full…” So the quota was long over for non-Arabs

8. Allah hates Blacks I am not very fair but also not that dark. Perhaps you can call me brown. I don’t know what my status is. But for ‘blacks’, this Arabic supremacy is even more humiliating.

There are countless references in Hadiths and Quran that Allah dislikes Black. He would thus ensure that before entry to Heaven, everyone would be made ‘white’. And all who enter Hell would be made dark. No text in the world is more hateful of ‘blacks’ and glorifies ‘Arabs’ then Islamic religious texts.

For example: Tabari IX:69 “Arabs are the most noble people in lineage, the most prominent, and the best in deeds. We were the first to respond to the call of the Prophet. We are Allah’s helpers and the viziers of His Messenger.

We fight people until they believe in Allah. He who believes in Allah and His Messenger has protected his life and possessions from us. Tabari II:11 “Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were cousins of the Turks. Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth.

He prayed that the African’s color would change so that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks. (Thus Blacks cannot be either prophets, apostles or kings in Islamic Ummah.

They instead got black color so that they could be slaves! Can anything be more insulting to blacks?) Ishaq:243 “I heard the Apostle say: ‘Whoever wants to see Satan should look at Nabtal!’

He was a black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks… ”Gabriel came to Muhammad and said, ‘If a black man comes to you, his heart is more gross than a donkey’s.” Ishaq:144

“A rock was put on a slave’s chest. Bukhari: V9B89N256 “Allah’s Apostle said, ’You should listen to and obey your ruler even if he is a black African slave whose head looks like a raisin.’ Just look at the derogatory remarks for a ‘black’! Ibn Timiyya (Vol. 32, p. 89)

“Slavery is justified because of the war itself; however, it is not permissible to enslave a free Muslim. It is lawful to kill the infidel or to enslave him, and it also makes it lawful to take his offspring into captivity.

“ Ibn Timiyya (Vol. 31, p. 380) So Islam not only allows for Muslim to capture slaves in wars, yet the sons and daughters of these slaves are also legal properties of the captor Muslim! Ibn Hashim: “Prophet’s Biography” (Al-Road Al-Anf’) (Part 4, p. 177) This question was delivered to Mufti Ibn Timiyya.

“A man married a maid-slave who bore him a child. Would that child be free or would he be an owned slave?” Ibn Timiyya (Vol. 31, p. 376 – 377) Ibn Timiyya replied: “Her child whom she bore from him would be the property of her master according to all the Imams (heads of the four Islamic schools of law)

because the child follows the status of his mother in freedom or slavery. If the child is not of the race of Arabs, then he is definitely an owned slave according to the scholars, but the scholars disputed his status among themselves if he was from the Arabs – whether he must be enslaved or not, because when A’isha

(Mohammed’s wife) had a maid-slave who was an Arab, Mohammed told A’isha, `Set this maid free because she is from the children of Ishmael.

’ For more references, visit http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/127866 and http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2067472/posts

Why does Allah hate my color?

I am proud to be brown. My friends are proud to be black. To me they are more handsome than rest of the world because I respect them for what they are. Why does Allah want to change our identities when we enter Heaven? Why has he destined ‘blacks’ till Judgment Day?

What’s so wrong with being Black? The real reason is that Arabs were the fairest and hence this dogma of Arab supremacy was bound to exist in Islam.

It was my folly that I did not read it so far and got manipulated. Thus, the brutal Arabic truth is that: a. I am a Mawali b. I was converted to Islam by getting my neck tied with chains c.

Arabs are best among all humans and I belong to an inferior race d. Final message and messengers of Allah were sent in the foreign language and land and still I had to surrender to Arabs because I was inferior e. I cant rule Muslims/world because I do not possess ruling genes unlike Arab masters f.

The women belonging to my country/race can be offered to master Arabs but I cannot have women of the master race Arab g. Allah hates Blacks So what options I have today? I still feel like a loyal Muslim as Islam runs in my blood today. Its part of my ego now.

I have fought many battles for Islam and they define my pride. I killed my own self to take birth as an Islamic Jihadi. Where do I go now?  It would be a disgrace to Allah if I allow to be treated unfairly merely because Allah made me non-Arab. My pride of being Muslim cannot come at cost of insulting the Stupid  Allah.

Thus Islam HAS TO change and provide me total equality for sake of my self-dignity and pride, my sacrifices, the blood of my ancestors, the atrocities on my mother and sisters. Now some may say that whatever verses I have quoted are out of context and mistranslated.

In reality they mean something else. But that’s the whole point. Arabic is a foreign language for me. Arabic is a foreign language for majority of Muslims today. Even Arabic scholars refuse to claim that they understand Quran completely.

So this argument is baseless distraction. One cannot merely point at the Chanda Mama (Moon Uncle) to distract a grown up person who is no more a baby. To decide whether translations are true or false is not something that any non-Arab Muslim can do in this small life.

It is impossible even for Arab Muslims. All I know is that these translations have been taken from established texts of Islam published by official sources of all major schools and bodies of Islam.

The proof of cake lies in its eating. So instead of passing the buck on wrong translations or conspiracy of Kafirs or inadeqaute intelligence of Mawalis, all major schools and preachers of Islam have to officially announce the following if they are indeed not fooling non-Arab Muslims: 1. Whenever the next Caliph is appointed in future, whenever Muslim Ummah is strengthened, he would be a non-Arab Muslim.

We prefer him to be from Indian subcontinent because it is the largest Muslim group of world. But we do not mind and would instead welcome if he be a native African of ‘black’ color.  2. The next chief Imam of Masjid-al-Haram – the largest Terrorist Breeding Mosque of world that surrounds and manages Kaba area – would be a non-Arab. And the team of Imams would have a proportionate representation of all ethnic groups.

Till this happens, they would boycott and condemn Saudi Arabia government and call for ban on Hajj to oppose racism. After all, when EQUALITY – the much touted foundation of Islam – is mocked, rest of the rituals become mere jokes.

(So far not one single Imam in history of Mecca mosque has been non-Arab. Shame on this blatant racial discrimination in a location that is sacred for entire Muslim Ummah.)

3. They would force Saudi Arabia government to change rules regarding marriage of Arab woman to a non-Arab Muslim man. They would force Saudi Arabia government to proactively denounce recial discrimination in marrige as a social evil.

And till that happens, they would condemn Saudi Arabia government officially for being anti-Islamic.

4. All those translations of Quran, Tafsirs, Hadiths and other Islamic texts that smell of racial discrimination in any manner as fake and hence should be banned. They would issue fatwa that all these translations are ‘haram’ and any person involved in promoting, distributing, recommending or quoting these is guided by Satan. For example,

works of Ibn Kathir, Muhsin Khan, Yusuf Ali, Pickthall, Dawood, Jalalyn, Al-Tabari etc as available in English and Urdu deserve the fatwa. One can give benefit of doubt to Arabic verses assuming that their meanings can be understood only after Judgment Day.

But there has to be zero tolerance for all these translations. 5. The term Mawali be officially banned and there be heavy punishment for usage of this word for non-Arabs. 6. There should be official apology and repentance for the fact that ever since inception of Islam, none of the above points were forcefully adopted by any prominent Islamic group and no concrete steps were undertaken to destroy racism.

This should be cited as the greatest disgrace to Muslim Ummah of non-Arab world. I demand that my pride be restored. I am and want to remain a proud Muslim. But I also want to be a proud Indian, a proud Pakistani, a proud African.

And above all a proud human being. Religion that comes with strings of slavery is not a religion, but a farce. Vedic Dharma – which is applicable to all human beings and all religions – clearly states that Allah’s blessings is same for all – men, women, all nations, all creeds, all races, all colors.

I demand that my religious leaders and preachers ensure that Islam is formally adhering to this noble Vedic precept. All it has to do is to announce its support to the above points.

I love Islam. I live for Islam and can die for it. But not at cost of my nation and my roots. And definitely not at expense of dignity as a human. I refuse to be treated as a slave anymore.

Liberty is my first and foremost birthright that no ideology can dupe me to reliquish. I am first a human, then an Indian and only then a Muslim. I am a proud Muslim. But first I am a proud Indian and even before that I am a proud human being.

I can afford to even be a Murtid (apostate) but can settle for nothing less than exactly equal treatment and equal rights as Arabs. I also demand unconditional apology for the blunder so far. O Allah! Forgive me if I am wrong.

But it were You who taught me that I have right to smile and seek happiness simply because I am a human. You taught me even as a baby that all human beings deserve equal treatment regardless of race, gender or color.

This was the first lesson you taught me even before I came to know that I am Muslim and he is Hindu, Christian, Jew, whatever. All other lessons were taught by humans.

But this smile and equality was taught directly by You. I can leave everything else, but not this divine revelation of Yours. I can forget my gory past, I can forget how I became a Muslim, I can forget the cries of my ancestors who were murdered and raped, I can forget my roots, I can forget what I had been following ever since inception of humanity, I can forget my culture, but I simply cannot forget the first lessons of liberty and equality taught by You.

I would rather reject being called Muslim than reject You and Your lessons.

If I have to be a Muslim, let the above points be fulfilled first by the representatives of Islam. And till that happens, I am simply a human being.

(NOTE: For commenting and discussions on this article, please visit http://satyagni.com/4091/i-am-a-non-arab-muslim/. You can also comment on many other related articles on http://satyagni.com)

You may like: Vedic Religion in brief Islam means Peace Non-Muslims and Good Muslims – Born Losers Human Rights and the Great Akbar Foundations of Fundamentalist Terrorism Punishment for Blasphemy Filed Under: Human Rights This is a post from Agniveer: Vision of the Vedas

Sexual Slavery of Women in Islam

Sexual Slavery of Women in Islam

Islam has a long history of the enslavement of women. Of course, this was never mentioned to me at all. It was always said that a Muslim man can marry up to 4 women but 1 is better and hardly anybody actually did that any more. I never understood that part about “And that which your right hand possesses” but in truth, upon further study, it is quite clear that sexual slavery was practiced by the first Muslims.

There are hundreds of Hadith that deal with slavery and whole chapters of Hadith are dedicated to dealing with the taxation, treatment, sale, and jurisprudence of slaves. In addition to this, many Hadith mention slaves, and their relation to their Muslim masters. Here is a well known example that deals directly with our topic of female slaves used for sexual purposes according to Sahih Bukhari.

Vol. 7-#137 Narrated Abu al-Khudri: “We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus with them. So we asked Allah’s messenger about it and he said, “Do you really do that?” repeating the question thrice, “There is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence, till the Day of Resurrection.””

So, the Muslim warriors took prisoners of war and used them for sexual purposes. Mohamed doesn’t address this at all. He doesn’t say, “Do not have sex with them,” or “Ask for their hand in marriage and if they don’t agree, leave them alone.” Instead he addresses their question which is frankly, “During sex, can we pull out our members before we ejaculate (coitus interruptus) so as to not get them pregnant?” There is no mention of the emotional state of these women. No mercy for the feelings of those who had just seen their men-folk captured or killed and then taken off to a foreign land in which they were inevitably traumatized, scared, and far from everything familiar. Muhammad simply states that there is no reason to not ejaculate inside of them because whatever happens is destiny anyways, i.e. if they get pregnant, so they get pregnant. It’s Allah’s will.

Vol. 5-#459 [This Hadith is similar to the above. However, additional details are added]. Narrated Ibn Muhairiz: “I entered the mosque and saw Abu Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu said, “We went out with Allah’s messenger for the Ghazwa (attack upon) Banu Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interruptus we said “How can we do coitus interruptus without asking Allah’s messenger while he is present among us?” We asked (him) about it and he said “It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist.””

Related Hadith show that they didn’t want to get the women pregnant because they wanted the option to sell them or negotiate them for a ransom later on. Under Islamic law, they couldn’t sell pregnant female slaves.

In effect, Muhammad Okayed non-consensual sex. Could anyone believe that these women actually wanted to have sex with these men? Everyone always says what a mercy Islam was for woman because it erased the practice of burying girls alive. While that is true, I think that an issue as important as a woman’s choice of sexual partners is also an integral issue that should have been dealt with in a vastly different way.

Vol. 5-#637 Narrated Buraida: The prophet sent Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus ([one fifth] of the booty) and I hated Ali, and Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, “Don’t you see this (i.e. Ali)?” When we reached the prophet I mentioned that to him. He said, “O Buraida! Do you hate Ali?” I said, “Yes” He said, “Do you hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumus.”

The note for this Hadith says “Buraida hated Ali because he had taken a slave girl frorm the booty and considered that as something not good.”

Here Ali took a newly captured slave girl, and had sex with her. It seems that when Muhammad was told about it, he didn’t have a problem with this, and further stated that Ali deserved more than this.

Vol. 5-#512 Narrated Anas: “…..The prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives….”

This Hadith details the attack on the Jews of Khaibar. Again, many of the women and children were taken and made into slaves.

There are hundreds of other Hadith that deal with the topic of slavery in Islam, too numerous to mention. But does the Qur’an deal with the issue of female sexual slavery? Most definitely, and in vivid detail.

Qur’an (33:50) – “O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those (slaves) whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee”

This is a special command that Muhammad handed down to himself, allowing virtually unlimited concubines. Although Muslims are limited to four wives, but they may also have sex with an unlimited number of slaves, as long as they are obtained in Jihad.

Qur’an (23:5-6) – “..who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess…” This verse allows the slave-owner to have sex with his slaves.

Qur’an (70:27-30)- “And those who are fearful of the punishment of their Lord, indeed, the punishment of their Lord is not that from which one is safe – And those who guard their private parts, Save with their wives and those whom their right hands possess, for thus they are not blameworthy.”

This is a direct reference to concubines taken in Jihad.

Qur’an (4:24) – “And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” So in other words, (once they enter Muslim territory) sex with married slaves is permissible because they were taken in Jihad.

Muslims will constantly say that these verses are taken out of context, but then they will never explain the context to a Western female. Instead they will question your Iman and ask questions regarding your questions which try to make you feel insecure and imply that you are weak, at least that was my experience.

However, Maududi, a respected Islamic writer of Tafseer clearly writes regarding this verse:

Two categories of women have been excluded from the general command of guarding the private parts: (a) wives, (b) women who are legally in one’s possession, i.e. slave-girls. Thus the verse clearly lays down the law that one is allowed to have sexual relation with one’s slave-girl as with one’s wife, the basis being possession and not marriage. If marriage had been the condition, the slave-girl also would have been included among the wives, and there was no need to mention them separately. (Ibid. p. 241, note 7)

According to Mufti Ebrahim Desai, a prominent sheikh of the Marasah In’aamiyyah in Cape Town, South Africa, when asked if female slavery could be implemented in this day and age, he responded with the following:
.

One question that still remains is whether slavery still legally prevails anywhere in the Islamic world and whether it can be successfully implemented in this age…. Firstly, the prisoners have to be captured in ‘Jihaad’ in the true sense of the word.….. According to Islamic Law, captive female prisoners are also part and parcel of the booty. One fifth of the booty has to be first distributed to the needy, orphans, etc. The remaining four-fifths should then be distributed among the soldiers who participated in the war. The distribution can only take effect after the booty is brought into Islamic territory. The Ameerul-Mu’mineen (Head of the Islamic State) remains the guardian of the female prisoners until he allocates them to the soldiers. Only after a soldier has been allotted a slave girl, and made the owner of her, will she become his lawful possession. After she spends a period called ‘Istibraa’, which is the elapse of one menstrual period, it becomes permissible for her owner to have relations with her.[1]

It may be argued that American slave-owners committed sexual crimes against their slaves before the Civil War (1861-1865), so who are Americans to complain about Islam?

In fact, the two situations are different i.e. apples can not be compared to oranges. First, it is wrong to compare the US with the Muslim community founded by Muhammad, who claimed divine inspiration. Instead, it is best to compare the founder of a religion for example Jesus or Buddha with another founder, Muhammad. Second, in no place in the New Testament or in the Diamond Sutras does God give permission to men, to have sex with slave-girls. If Americans in a bygone era did this, then they were simply being immoral, but it was not religiously sanctified. The Quran, however, codifies and legalizes these sexual acts. I just don’t know how any clear-thinking individual can not see that having sex with women in a very desperate condition i.e. being enslaved is wrong.[2]

One might say, but how does this affect you and most women in this day and age? First of all, anything done in Islamic history can be revived at any time, so if Muslims gained power over Western nations, which many have every intention of doing, and practiced Jihad as the followers of Islam actually did, which they are commanded to do, it is plausible that this could happen. Secondly, again, Mohamed was presented to me as a spiritual leader, not a military warlord, so inevitably, a person assessing Islam has to ask himself, “Are these the actions of the person who should be followed and admired for all time?”

Related Articles

• Slavery and Sex Slavery IN ISLAM (netsurfing.wordpress.com)
• Mohammed Rapist (paulmarcelrene.wordpress.com)
• In Islam, Slavery is Allah’s Eternal Design and Blessing for Humanity (sleepingbeautyslavery.wordpress.com)
• Sexism in major religions of the world (visayanatheists.wordpress.com)

Moslims are Funny when They Are Not Killing.

Great Virtues of Islam onto Muslims

Allah tells Muslims in Quran: 3.110 “You are the best people, raised for the good of mankind”. And certainly there are. The following are the great Islamic qualities that distinguish them from others.

MUSLIMS HAVE HIGH LIBIDO

As a special favour from Allah all Muslim men are given high libido.

They can fondle a mannequin and get the same arousal and pleasure as fondling the real thing. In this photo, Islamic men are fondling mannequins in a local mall and getting sexual pleasure…

MUSLIMS LOVE LITTLE GIRLS

Prophet married Ayesha when she was 6. He thighed her till she was 9.

HIGH LIBIDO HAS IT’S SERIOUS DISADVANTAGES

Our Prophet was given a libido of 30 men.

Bukhari,Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268:

“Prophet was given the sexual strength of thirty men”.

Prophet got aroused even by baby girls. He could imagine having sex with wives and get the same pleasure as the real thing.

BUKHARI, Volume 7, Book 71, Number 660:

Narrated Aisha:

“Allah’s Apostle used to think that he had sexual relations with his wives (and came) while he actually had not”.

And Ayesha ended up cleaning his come.

Bukhari,Book 002, Number 0572:

Aisha said, “In case I found that (semen) on the garment of the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) dried up, I scraped it off with my nails.”

So this high libido became his liability. He apparently came during foreplay and could not plant his seeds.

http://sheikyermami.com/wp-content/uploads/aisha-hr.gif

That is the reason he could not sire a single child in Madina although he slept with women day and night. (Maria’s child could be sired by his slave, whom Prophet sent Ali to kill)

Bukhari,Volume 1, Book 6, Number 299:

Narrated ‘Abdur-Rahman bin Al-Aswad:

‘Aisha said: “Whenever Allah’s Apostle wanted to fondle anyone of us during her periods (menses), he used to order her to put on an Izar and start fondling her.” ‘Aisha added, “None of you could control his sexual desires as the Prophet could.” (naïve little Ayesha thought Prophet controlled his desire, she did not know that Prophet had already come)

MUSLIMS ARE NOT AFRAID TO BLOW THEMSELVES UP

NASA has been asked to use Muslims in the space program.

MUSLIMS TRAVEL TO FAR OFF LANDS TO GAIN KNOWLEDGE

A suicide-bombing school in Pakistan. Students come from far off lands. Pakistan has the honor of being the biggest exporter of Mujahids.

EVERY BODY IS SCARED OF MUSLIMS

Muslims in traditional garb make airline passengers shit their pants.

MUSLIM ARE RESPECTED BY KUFFAR

While other inmates are called prisoners, Muslim inmates are called guest detainees. While other inmates offer prayer in their beds, Muslims are provided with on site mosques.

MUSLIMS ARE VERY LOYAL TO THEIR OWN

Alhamdulillah all Muslims voted for an inexperienced community organizer Buraq Hussain Obama, who was born in Kenya just because they believe deep down he is a Muslim (if they thought he had apostate by leaving Islam they would have killed him). Mashallah even hard core republican Muslims voted for the Islamic candidate of Democratic Party.

GOOD MUSLIMS ARE NOT AFRAID TO TRAVEL FOR GOD’S WORK

http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/2006_07.html

No body offers better benefits than global Jihad people. Assignments are exciting, expense accounts are generous, accommodations are luxurious and afterlife benefits are out of this world (include 72 virgins with swelling breasts).

MUSLIMS LOVE APOSTATE KILLERS

In Pakistan Malik Khadri, who killed Panjab Governor Salman Taseer for going against Quran by criticizing blasphemy law thus apostatizing from Islam, is honored and garlanded by an adoring high five giving crowd.

http://barenakedIslam.wordpress.com/2011/01/18/surprise-pakistani-Muslim-wife-beheaders-lawyer-is-a-joooooooooooooo/20090213cairbridgesaward/

HONOR KILLING IS AN HONORED TRADITION OF ISLAM

Largest Islamic organization CAIR is honoring Muzammal Hasan, the CEO of Islamic TV and prolific wife beater, who beheaded his wife Aasia. Aasia had apostatized by denouncing wife beating (an important tenet of Quran (4.34)) and later divorcing her husband (a serious violation of sharia law).

MUSLIMS LOVE MULTIPLE SEX PARTNERS

Approved animals for sex: Lambs, sheeps, goats, cows and camels. (Restrictions: after sex a man is not allowed to drink the milk or eat the meat of the animal he made love to)

Reference:
Ayatollah Khomeini, Tahrire al vasyleh, vol. 4, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990.

MUSLIMS ARE FAITHFUL TO THEIR SEX PARTNERS

(http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/000420.html

MUSLIMS CARE ABOUT THEIR CHILDREN’S BRIGHT FUTURE

Giving them deaths as shaheeds in jihad, the dead children gain paradise instantly, the very best gift a father can give to his offspring. (9.111)

MUSLIMS ARE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY SUICIDE BOMBERS

A shaheed bypasses grave and judgement day and goes directly to paradise after shahadat (9.111).

MUSLIMS LOVE HALAL SEX AND DESPISE HARAM SEX

Our prophet killed kuffar and forced himself on their wives and daughters and raped them while their husbands and fathers dead bodies were still warm. Alhamdulillah that is clean halal sex, approved and blessed by Allah in Quran. However, consensual sex between two consenting adults is dirty and haram in Islam and our prophet ordered such people stoned to death. Masahallah in sharia countries good Muslims still follow this beautiful sunna of stoning with greatest celebration and enthusiasm. Any man who even throws a single stone on these adulterers get the same blessing as throwing a stone on satan during Haj. Here is a recent stoning of a young couple who were deeply in love.

Muhammad: A Cult Leader

Image via Wikipedia

SOME TIMES ; BY SAM HINDU                From Understanding Muhammad: A Psychobiography of Allâh’s Prophet
We are often taken aback by the level of fanaticism of Muslims. Millions of them riot, burn churches, and kill completely innocent people because a newspaper has published a few cartoons of Muhammad or because the Pope has quoted a medieval emperor saying that violence is not compatible with the nature of God.People generally are biased towards a belief system that has this many followers. They believe that the sheer size of Islam qualifies it as a religion. But is Islam really a religion?Some say all religions start as a cult until, with the passage of time, they gradually gain acceptance and the status of religion. However, there are certain characteristics that distinguish cults from religions. Dr. Janja Lalich and Dr. Michael D. Langone have created a list that describes cults fairly well.[1] The more a group or a doctrine has these characteristics the more it follows that it should be defined and labeled as a cult. The following is that list, which I have compared Islam to point by point.1. The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law.

Muslims are extremely zealous about their faith and have an unquestioning commitment to their prophet, whose book, the Qur’an, for them is Truth and Law.

2. Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished.

Muslims are forbidden to question and doubt the basic tenets of their faith, and dissent is punishable by death.

3. Mind-altering practices (such as meditation, chanting, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions, and debilitating work routines) are used in excess and serve to suppress doubts about the group and its leader(s).

Five times during the day Muslims stop whatever they are doing and stand for a repetitive and ritualistic prayer and chant the Qur’an. In addition, for one whole month in the year they must fast and abstain from drinking or eating, from dawn to dusk, a practice that can be particularly taxing in summertime.

4. The leadership dictates, sometimes in great detail, how members should think, act, and feel, Ffor example, members must get permission to date, change jobs, marry—or leaders prescribe what types of clothes to wear, where to live, whether or not to have children, how to discipline children, and so forth.

Every detail of the life of a Muslim is prescribed. He is told what is forbidden (haram) and what is permitted (halal), what food to eat, how to dress, and what rituals to follow in order to pray. A Muslim is not allowed to date, and marriages are arranged. Corporal punishment, including torture for disobedience to the authorities, is enjoined, both for children and adults.

5. The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s) and members. Ffor example, the leader is considered the Messiah, a special being, an avatar—or the group and/or the leader is on a special mission to save humanity.

Muslims claim special status for their prophet, while they vilify all other religions. They can become extremely violent if their prophet is slighted. They regard themselves as superior to all others, and when in a non-Muslim country, they constantly lobby for concessions and preferential treatments like the special privilege of having a special room set aside in publicly funded schools so that Muslim students can pray there. They are frequently granted exceptions unavailable to members of other religions. Recently in Ontario , Canada , they tried to make Islamic law (Sharia) recognized and binding, so they could bypass Canadian law. They were defeated, thanks largely to the tireless opposition of ex-Muslims.

6. The group has a polarized us-versus-them mentality, which may cause conflict with the wider society.

Muslims have a very strong us-versus-them mentality. They call all non-Muslims, regardless of faith, kafir, an expressly derogatory term, which means one who blasphemes God. For them, the world is forever divided into Dar al Salam (House of Peace) and Dar al Harb (House of War). The non-Muslim countries are the House of War. It is the duty of every Muslim to wage jihad on the House of War, to fight, kill and subdue non-Muslims and convert that land into the House of Peace. Peace, according to Islam can only be attained by subduing non-Muslims and making them subordinate to Islamic rule. The idea is not so much to convert everyone to Islam, but to make Islam dominant. The non-Muslims can continue practicing their religion, but only as dhimmis, a term which means protected and is only applied to Christians and Jews. The Christians and the Jews (the people of the Book) will be protected, provided they pay the protection tax, known as the jizyah and feel themselves humiliated and subdued, as stated in the Qur’an.[2] If they fail to pay the jizyah, they can be exiled or put to death. This is how the Mafia operates. If you own a business, you could be harassed or even killed, unless you pay them a protection fee to be left alone. As for those unbelievers who are not protected, i.e. the pagans, the atheist, the animists, etc., they have either to convert or be killed.

7. The leader is not accountable to any authorities.

For Muslims, all actions of Muhammad constitute law. He cannot be held accountable for his actions. He was entitled to marry or have sex out of marriage with as many women as he wished. He could raid civilians, kill unarmed men, loot their properties and take their women and children as slaves and even rape them. He could assassinate his critics and torture them to make them reveal where they had hidden their treasures. He could have sex with children. He could lie and deceive his opponents. He could massacre his prisoners of war in cold-blood. None of that bothers his followers. At first they deny all of the above charges vehemently, accusing you of maligning their prophet, but once the evidence is presented, they suddenly change tactic and defend him, justifying his evil deeds, the very deeds they outrageously denied. For Muslims, Muhammad’s actions are not measured by what we humans know as right and wrong. Rather he is the standard, the measure of right and wrong. As the result, if a crime was committed by Muhammad, that crime becomes a holy deed and is emulated by his followers unquestioningly. Muslims are capable of committing the most atrocious acts of indecency and savagery with clear conscience, because it is sunnah (performed by Muhammad).

8. The group teaches or implies that its supposedly exalted ends justify whatever means it deems necessary. This may result in members’ participating in behaviors or activities they would have considered reprehensible or unethical before joining the group (for example, lying to family or friends, or collecting money for bogus charities).

In Islam, the ends always justify the means. For example, killing is bad, but if it is done to promote Islam, it is good. Suicide is prohibited, but suicide bombing that will cause the death of non-Muslims is a holy act. Stealing from fellow Muslims is prohibited and the thief’s hand will be chopped, but looting non-believers was practiced by Muhammad and so is considered acceptable by Muslims. Sexual intercourse out of marriage is taboo, but rape of the women of unbelievers is okay. The goal, which is the establishment of the reign of Allâh on Earth, is regarded to be so lofty that everything else becomes secondary. In the history of Islam, we read that people murdered their own fathers or waged war against them. Such actions are praised as the sign of faith and devotion of the believer. Lying in Islam is prohibited, except when it is said to deceive the non-Muslims and advance the interests of Islam.

9. The leadership induces feelings of shame and/or guilt in order to influence and/or control members. Often, this is done through peer pressure and subtle forms of persuasion.

Muslims’ thoughts tend to be overridden with guilt. If a Muslim does something contrary to what is permitted, other Muslims are required to remind him or her of the Sharia law and demand compliance. In most Islamic countries, particularly in Iran and Saudi Arabia , it is the state that makes sure the individuals follow the religious law. In March 2002 Saudi Arabia ‘s religious police stopped schoolgirls from leaving a blazing building because they were not wearing correct Islamic dress.[3] As a result fifteen girls were burned alive.

10. Subservience to the leader or group requires members to cut ties with family and friends, and radically alter the personal goals and activities they had before joining the group.

Muslim converts are encouraged to cut their ties with family and friends if they are not Muslims. I have received countless heart-rending stories from non-Muslim parents whose children converted to Islam with whom they have lost touch completely. Occasionally, they may receive a call or a cold visit, but the visit may be so restricted, so bereft of any love from their children and their Muslim spouses that the outcome further saddens the already heartbroken parents. The purpose of these visits is usually to ask the parents to convert to Islam. They leave, as soon resistance is encountered.

11. The group is preoccupied with bringing in new members.

Muslims’ main goal is to promote Islam. This practice of promoting Islam is called da’wa. It is the duty of every Muslim to bring new converts, starting with their own family and friends. Expanding Islam is the main obsession of every Muslim.

12. The group is preoccupied with making money.

Raising funds for jihad is one of the main objectives of all Muslims. Today this is done through what are known as Islamic “charities.” However, during the time of Muhammad, and throughout the course of Islam, raising money for jihad was done principally by looting. Islam’s main goal is to establish itself as the pre-eminent earthly power.

13. Members are expected to devote inordinate amounts of time to the group and group-related activities.

Muslims’ main preoccupation is Islam. They are required to regularly go to the mosque, attend obligatory prayers five times a day, listen to the sermons, etc. So enwrapped do they become in their thinking about how to perform their religious duties, what to wear, what to eat, how to perform their prayers, etc. that they are left with very little time for thinking of anything else. In fact, they are even told what to think and what not to think.

14. Members are encouraged or required to live and/or socialize only with other group members.

Muslims are taught to shun kafirs and are encouraged to socialize only with fellow Muslims. The Qur’an prohibits taking friends from among unbelievers (Q.3:28), calls them najis (filthy, impure) (Q.9:28), and orders harshness towards them (Q.9:123). According to Muhammad, the unbelievers are the vilest animals in the sight of God. (Q.8:55)

15. The most loyal members (the “true believers”) feel there can be no life outside the context of the group. They believe there is no other way to be, and often fear reprisals to themselves or others if they leave (or even consider leaving) the group.

The thought of leaving Islam is something so unbearable for true Muslims they can’t even entertain it. Despite the fact that millions of Muslims have left Islam in recent years, hardcore Muslims remain adamant in believing nobody ever really leaves Islam, that such claims are all fabrications and part of the conspiracy to shake the faith of believers. Emails I have received from Muslims share one common theme. They all warn me of hellfire in the afterlife. Between the fear of hell and fear of reprisal, Muslims are trapped in a web of terror of their own making.

Islam was not created to teach humans spirituality, nor make them enlightened. The spiritual message in Islam is secondary or virtually nonexistent. Piety in Islam means emulating Muhammad, a man who was far from pious. Rituals like prayers and fasting are mere window dressings to lure the foolhardy inside, to give Islam the appearance of sacredness and spirituality.

This subject is explained in more detail in my book Understanding Muhammad: A Psychobiography of Allâh’s Prophet

References ;——————————————————————————–

[1] www.csj.org/infoserv_cult101/checklis.htm

[2] Qur’an 9:29 “Fight those who believe not in Allâh nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

[3] http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1874471.stm

• You, Auli Karanta, Ketan Shah and Dharma Rakshak like this.
• • 
    Shabbir Ali Vijapura
    I’d like to argue each part of this article.
    As for the first point, that type of mentality can be shared by any abrahamic religion. It does not just have to do with Islam
    …2.
    Muslims are encouraged to question any doubts they are having about their religion to a “Sheikh” or “Moulana” who studies the religion of Islam. We are not forbidden to ask any sort of question, because answers will only make a persons faith stronger. It’s understandable to not have answers for some questions.
    3.
     Mind-altering practices? That’s hilarious. The author of this article makes it seem like meditation is bad for you. He says meditation and namaaz coincide and I agree, because both of them are used to ease the soul of all the troubles they are feeling. It is a way to get away from the world’s troubles and relax. People don’t meditate for “mind alterations”. <– That’s what drugs are for.
    4.
    I’m not sure if the author of this article wants a religion with no restrictions, but if I can recall almost all religions have the same basic restrictions.
    5.
    If the author thinks we think our prophet is a Messiah, then what about Christian’s and Jesus? They believe that he died for their sins and because of this mentality many believe that they can do whatever they want without having to worry about God’s punishment.
    6. The “Us against the World” mentality was brought upon by people like the one who wrote this article. We don’t exactly have many people on “our side”. There may be so much negativity against us in the world, but we still end up being the fastest growing religion in the world. This is no thanks to anyones support.
    … I’ll have to argue the rest later. I have work right now
    See More
    March 22, 2010 at 9:15am · LikeUnlike
  • 
    DrShivkumar Angadi
    It is interesting to note that Muslim apologists like the one above me merrily propose and talk about an Islam that does not exist in the Quran and was never practised by the Prophet!
    Mr. Bhatt has compiled an excellent article. It simply pr…oves that the problem is not Muslims- but ISLAM!See More
    March 22, 2010 at 9:42am · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Ketan Shah I fail to understand how can anybody with an iota of commonsense follow this hideous cult!
    March 22, 2010 at 1:20pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Sam Hindu
    I shall answer one by one points of our reader Mr. Shabbir,
     1) As for the first point, that type of mentality can be shared by any abrahamic religion. It does not just have to do with Islam
    My Answer ; If all the Abrahimic rel. are same what …is new offered by Islam ? As for the first point, that type of mentality can be shared by any abrahamic religion. It does not just have to do with Islam cult leader.
     As a new leader you are supose to take mankind from Darkness to Light not follow the same old retuals and blind faith,
     What was new offered by Mohammad ? Nothing. Nata. Zero, Zilp. Shunya,
    What is Cult?
    the difference is the size of the group.
    first it is a cult
    the cult grows and becomes a sect
    the sect grows and becomes a religion
    all religions were cults at one point.
    baptist…sunni……these are sects.
    See More
    March 22, 2010 at 3:24pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Sam Hindu
    anytime a strong leader is worshiped it is a cult and a cult is not necessarily bad but can become a religion over time. Brigham Young was a cult leader just as Jesus was but Young murdered people and as far as i can tell Jesus never did.
    An…y religious group that asks you to suspend your own independent thinking and asserts that they and only they have all the answers is a cult.
    Any religious group that thinks non-members are a mere sub-category of human beings is a cult.
    Any religious group that totally disregards science is a cult.
    See More
    March 22, 2010 at 3:29pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Dharma Rakshak Mohammad was a great genious you have to admit.He created a calt which has been brainwashing people since the last 1400 years. Actually he was a patient of Temporal lobe syndome.so he was suffering from hallucination and saw giberial is coming with message.
    March 22, 2010 at 8:44pm via Facebook Mobile · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Shabbir Ali Vijapura
    Santosh kaka. I can say a lot of things that may offend you so I won’t and I’ll just leave it as it is. I am totally ashamed at you even tagging me in this article being a Muslim. If you want to create your own “cult” of Muslim haters great…. I won’t educate these idiots above me of what they are missing in the religion. Especially Dharma above me who can barely spell correctly and Siddharth who obviously has no prior knowledge of Islam and is just following the crowd.
    If you’re so stuck on the “pedo” prophet then you guys really need to move on. Obviously you guys are stubborn but hundreds of people a day are converting to Islam because they are finding the truth behind that you are lacking.
    I feel like I’m arguing with a bunch of uneducated, stubborn people. And of course I’m going to get a bunch of “hate” comments after this, but you know what it’s just going to show me how blind you guys really are.See More
    March 22, 2010 at 10:36pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Shabbir Ali Vijapura
    And I want you to notice that those who are educated in the world are the ones that are not against the Muslims, because they actually understand our beliefs.
    You guys are “hating” away against the Muslims right now, but as soon as someone q…uestions your beliefs you will be the ones rioting like Muslims do. If the pope were to say something against hinduism I’m sure it would cause you guys to get riled up too. We’re not “barbaric” we are protecting our beliefs.
    I want you to know that not one person throughout these comments had anything skeptical to say. They were all just witty comments that have been made hundreds of times before. If you have some true criticism let me know until then you’re wasting my time and yours.
    Also, you don’t see me saying anything about your religion and how irrational it is, but we’ll leave that aside for those who want to go against others beliefs as you do.See More
    March 22, 2010 at 10:54pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Vineesh V Iyer
    Shabbir , people have got their freedom of expression/speach . I am not 100% agreeing with what anyone says against islam , its your wish to follow certain aspects , whether its good or bad , cus its not what you decide. We say Freedom for …everything even religion . In reality we don’t have that , we just follow what our ancestors ve shown us , never mind if it is hdu or Xlam .
    please cut the crap , 100′s of people are … if someone try to move away from Hinduism to join islam . I am sorry to say , they are at the core of their illiteracy . Every religion is for some good , but , if someone kill the human kind by taking that name is rubbish and that’s what i hate the most . Xlam guys fight for something , i dont know what they are going to achieve … trying to kill all the other guys and want to create a xlam’s own world . i feel pity for such people.
    Mate , you cannot compare islam with hinduism .. islam is a religion and hinduism is not a religion , its a culture , way of life ..
    See More
    March 22, 2010 at 11:04pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Shabbir Ali Vijapura
    Sharif:
    Santosh, I can see that you are spending most of your time on internet criticizing Muslims and Islam, but I know your background from your childhood.You have lot to learn about Islam before you start posting anything on the interne…t.In spite of negative publicity after 9/11 Islam is still the fastest growing religion in the world and that’s a fact. You need to get your facts together and those who are converting into Islams are not ignorant people like you who have low IQ’s but instead highly intellectual people. Which part of the world you are living in? Before 9/11 there were approx. 600,000 people who were converting to Islam per year and now there are over 2 million people converting per year. These are public figures too.
    This just shows you that there are many open minded people in the world[not biased to their own religion like you] who have started to read the Quran and study Islam. See More
    March 22, 2010 at 11:12pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Shabbir Ali Vijapura
    Out of all the stuff you said Vineesh. The only thing I can tell you is that a Muslim can follow the teachings of Hinduism without being a Hindu. I agree, it does have a great way of life. I will not deny that, but that’s no reason to say s…omeone who becomes a Muslim from a Hindu is illiterate. That statement in itself makes absolutely no sense.
    So mate, I can compare Islam with Hinduism because by definition they are both religions of which you are too proud of one.See More
    March 22, 2010 at 11:19pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Vineesh V Iyer Mate , my point is , there should at least be 1 thing that they didn’t find in Hinduism . I challenge you for that . Is there at least 1 thing that you could find in your books faith and which is not in Hinduism ?
    March 22, 2010 at 11:22pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Sam Hindu Are emotions of Muslims more important than the lives of the innocent people who become victims of Muslims on daily basis? Why do you think your sensibility is worth more than the lives of non-Muslims? Muslims are busy killing others and this does not offend you but stating the truth about your psychopath prophet offends, you?
    March 22, 2010 at 11:47pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Sam Hindu
    You are mistaken. Arabs had great cultures prior to Islam. They are still great people and without Islam they can shine. I have explained this phenomenon that you are talking about. Narcissist psychopaths take the identity of their vict…ims away from them and make them their co-dependent. This is what has happened to Muslims whether Arabs or non Arabs. It is time that we get rid of this nefarious belief and reclaim our identity, not as addicts and co dependent to a narcissist but as free people.
    Not all Arabs were desert dwelling tribes. In Arabia there were many cities like Mecca, Nijran and Okaz that were centers of culture and erudition. What about other nations with glorious pasts that lost everything including their language and identity to Islam? Weren’t Egypt, Byzantine, Persia and India (today’s Pakistan) a lot better prior to Islam than they have been any time after they succumbed to it? You say these people think Islam is the best religion. Are they free to compare it with any other religion? How can they know when there is no freedom to criticize Islam in these countries? Islam has survived only because it has silenced criticisms not because it is better.
    Infact truth is milions of Muslims are leaving not joining.See More
    March 22, 2010 at 11:53pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Shabbir Ali Vijapura lol I’d like to see “Millions” of Muslims leaving Islam. I’d really love to see some proof on that one. If you want to see proof about Muslims joining Islam I can show you that, but there is no place where I see them leaving.
    March 23, 2010 at 12:16am · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Sam Hindu
    just do google search or any other search and write Ex Muslims and you shall get shock of your life time.
    Those who are attracted toward Islam are More of Criminal back ground and decent people may join for short time once they realise bitte…r truth and war mannual taught instead of Spirituality and Love they leave.See More
    March 23, 2010 at 6:10am · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Siddharth Sukhwal
    There are more people leaving islam then those who are joining it. But most of the ex-muslims wont show their identity because apostasy in islam is considered a death penalty. Islam is truly the religion of “peace”!!!
    Shabbir Ami Vijapura, c…an you go and please check if “Vijapura” is a muslim last name or a hindu last name. You are a descendent of the coward hindus who left hinduism because they didnt wanted to get murdered by “peaceful” muslims. Peace Be Upon you and may god give you some brain.See More
    March 23, 2010 at 4:31pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Shabbir Ali Vijapura
    hahaha Siddharth you’re one funny dude not gonna lie.
    I can guarantee you one thing there are more Muslims joining Islam than leaving.
    As for my last name, “Vijapur” is actually a city in Gujarat that my descendants were probably from. That h…as nothing to do with being Hindu. I do agree though, my descendants were Hindu and they were not cowards to leave the religion. I refrained from saying anything offensive about your religion, but I think that should end now because you obviously don’t have the decency and morality to respect mine.
    I know that my ancestors were not forced about he religion of Islam, but instead saw how wrong they were to believe in a religion like Hinduism.
    and Santosh kaka next time you want to have a real argument I suggest you actually tag more people that are Muslim instead of just me. I am doing my best to defend myself against your uneducated cult members and I think I’m doing a great job. I suggest you find some people who actually have some knowledge about what their talking about.
    oh and Siddarth, I suggest you get some “brain” before you talk about anyone giving it.See More
    March 23, 2010 at 10:35pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Shabbir Ali Vijapura Oh and Santosh kaka do you think I’m a criminal for being attracted towards Islam?
    March 23, 2010 at 10:37pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Shabbir Ali Vijapura I’ll take that ignorant and stupid comment as a “I give up”.
    Thanks for playing
    March 25, 2010 at 9:34am · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Sam Hindu
    I was just wondering ……….
    1) Hypothetically speaking, if I have you decapitated for not sharing my beliefs and views, thereafter taking possession of your property, violate your wife (in fact, I may just have sexual intercourse with her with…in 24 hours of your decapitation, if she happens to be a beautiful 17 year old Jew) and bring up your children to hate and ridicule you as well as your beliefs and to think that your death was perfectly justified as it was ordered by some person known as the Merciful a.k.a the Compassionate (like some sort of sick joke), is that perfectly alright with you? Kindly explain if your answer is in the negative.
    Would your answer be different, if you only thought that your beliefs are right whereas I KNOW that only I am right?
    2) Muslims always say that “ISLAM IS THE FASTEST GROWING RELIGION IN THE WORLD”. As Christianity is currently the ‘largest religion in the world, this would mean that at least some point in time Christianity was the fastest growing religion in the world. Does this mean that Christianity is still the one true religion OR was it only the one true religion during the centuries when it was the fastest growing?
    Since in the early and mid 20th century, atheism was the fastest growing “belief” in the world, does that mean that there was no God during those decades?
    If pork consumption becomes the fastest growing dietary trend in the world, does that mean that God is trying to tell mankind that pork is God’s choice of meat?
    3) Do you think that apostates from Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism and Buddhism who embrace Islam should be killed by their former fellow co religionists?
    If your answer is in the negative, please explain in not more than 50 words why converts to Islam should be treated differently from apostates of Islam.
    4) Since an enormous mosque has been built in Rome, the heart of Catholicism, would you advise/encourage the Pope to have a cathedral of a similar size be constructed in Mecca to cement and nurture ties between Catholicism and Islam, the world’s most peaceful and tolerant religion?
    Would your answer be any different, if the purpose of having the Cathedral built in Mecca is not to nurture ties, but to propagate Christianity in the same manner and extent as what Muslims are doing in the West?
    5) If there were books and other materials published/distributed or made available in your country which advocates violence against Muslims and is blasphemous to Islam, do you agree that it should be banned?
    If you happened to be a peace-loving and tolerant Muslim, would your answer be any different, if these books and materials advocates violence and war against Jews, Christians and Pagans ONLY and is only blasphemous to these religions (e.g. attacking the very fundamentals of Christianity such Jesus was not the Son of God and he never died on the cross)?
    6) Do you agree that on 9/11 it was “ISLAM WHICH WAS HIJACKED” as most American Muslims claim? [Personally I think it was Humanity which has been hijacked by Islam, not that my opinion counts]
    If your answer is in the affirmative, I would presume that Allah would naturally sent these HIJACKERS OF ISLAM to Hell. Right?
    Question : How do you think Allah should deal with the hundreds of thousands who cheered, celebrated, danced on the streets, shoot in the air after they saw ISLAM BEING HIJACKED on 9/11?
    Please let me know your thoughts. Your views on the above matter are highly appreciated.See More
    March 29, 2010 at 10:46pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Suman Mukherjee
    Shabbir Ali Vijapura, if you want to see how millions of Muslims are leaving Islam please go through the following link:
    1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdVnILalpeo&feature=player_embedded
    2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dcaLQa97PA&featu…re=related
    3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oi-C3uouDLs&feature=related
    If you want more…..it can be supplied……thanks Santosh for presenting an excellent article…
    Thanks!!!See More
    April 16, 2010 at 7:16am · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Idar ’Dragen’ Steigedal hahaha!!! the number of muslims growing is because of birthrates you dumbass muslims!!!
    May 17, 2010 at 6:07pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Sam Hindu
    ttp://www.amcoptic.com/fatawy_ islamiah/ayatollah_khomeini.ht m
    Ayatollah Khomeini:
    A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However he should not penetrate, sodomising the child is OK. If the man penetrates and damag…es the child then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girls sister.
    From Khomeini’s book, “Tahrirolvasyleh”, fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990
    Book Title Page/ Cover
    Inside Cover of Book
    Excerpt: Page [1]| Page [2]
    [Mohammad (founder of Islam) The Pedophile]
    It is better for a girl to marry in such a time when she would begin
    menstruation at her husband’s house rather than her father’s home. Any
    father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in
     heaven. From Khomeini’s book, “Tahrirolvasyleh”, fourth volume, Darol Elm,
     Gom,
    Iran, 1990 [Mohammad (founder of Islam) The Pedophile]
    A man can have sex with animals such as sheep¹s, cows, camels and so on. However he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, however selling the meat to the next door village should be fine.
    From Khomeini’s book,See More
    May 23, 2010 at 8:18pm · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Lars-Toralf Utnes Storstrand
    According to the socalled ABC-rule, which states that Religions ASSURE salvation; religions BELIEVE in a precise theology; and religions CONVERT nonbelievers, islam cannot qualify to be a religion, because it doesn’t assure salvation for al…l adherents, nor converts. ONLY those who die for “allah” are assured, and that does not include women (they may enter jannah, if they become shahid, but they must still keep to the back). Islam is a fatalist system, where everything is in the hands of allah. That’s why they always state “Insh’allah” (if allah wants).See More
    June 7, 2010 at 2:12am · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Lars-Toralf Utnes Storstrand
    According to the socalled ABC-rule, which states that Religions ASSURE salvation; religions BELIEVE in a precise theology; and religions CONVERT nonbelievers, islam cannot qualify to be a religion, because it doesn’t assure salvation for al…l adherents, nor converts. ONLY those who die for “allah” are assured, and that does not include women (they may enter jannah, if they become shahid, but they must still keep to the back). Islam is a fatalist system, where everything is in the hands of allah. That’s why they always state “Insh’allah” (if allah wants).See More
    June 7, 2010 at 2:13am · LikeUnlike
  • 
    Severiano von Buchenroder Hey Sam. Your last response saw Shabir packing his suitcase, running with his tail between his legs. Excellent piece of writing!
    August 30, 2010 at 4:20am via Facebook Mobile · UnlikeLike · 1 personLoading…
  • http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=404635110699

Related Articles

• Obama’s Muslim envoy: Islam is the Solution not the Problem (creepingsharia.wordpress.com)
• While you journalists were busy celebrating the uprisings in the Middle East, you seemed to have ignored these stories (yourdaddy.net)
• Muhammad: A Cult Leader (samhindu.wordpress.com)
• Muhammad Unmosqued (atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com)
• I am a Non-Arab Muslim Scum. (samhindu.wordpress.com)
• Quotations from the Koran about killing Christians: (xoutsocialism.wordpress.com)
• Sexual Slavery of Women in Islam (samhindu.wordpress.com)
• Why Attack Only Islam? By ; Ali Sina (samhindu.wordpress.com)
• The Satanic Verses (maldivianapostates.wordpress.com)

Time to Unmask Pedophile Mohamad.

---

<!–

---

–>

Daily
Catch Videos for 4-5-2011: A great American woman with some balls to go with
moxie, and more

Posted by PatriotUSA at 12:59
AM

This lady has got it down, spot on! Comments below by
Baron from Gates Of Vienna:

A young woman in Colorado named Ann Barnhardt watched
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) holding forth on television yesterday about the
necessity for rolling back the First Amendment in order not to anger Muslims.
This did not sit well with her, and she made a two-part video for YouTube
expressing her outrage, and vigorously affirming her right to patriotic
dissent.

She declares herself strongly at the beginning of the
first video:

Hello, my name is Ann Barnhardt, and I am apparently
one of the very, very last people left in Western Civilization who possesses any
quantity of brains and balls simultaneously.

And it gets even better after that. The second
video shows her tearing out pages — bookmarked with strips of bacon — from the
Koran, and burning them one by one.

I don’t always regard Koran-burning as an effective
tactic, although I fully support anyone who decides to do it. However, in this
case I heartily approve of Ms. Barnhardt’s actions, because she does the job
properly: she reads a relevant verse from the page before tearing it out and
consigning it to hellfire. The verses she recites include 4:34 (beating your
wife), the Sword Surah, some of the “smite their necks” ayats, and all those
promises of sweet young boys like clear pearls for the believers who make it to
paradise.

Ann Barnhardt rebuts Lindsey Graham’s remarks on
4/3/2011 regarding the First Amendment. Part 1 of 2.

Part
Two:

Here are some comments that were posted by Gate Of
Vienna readers:

Zenster said…

Bacon bookmarks? Sheer genius! If the majority of
American women were cast in this mold, the entire Sex and Gender thread would
not have been necessary. Nor would shari’a law have anything resembling the
foothold in America that that it currently enjoys courtesy of lickspittle
Islamic lapdogs like Graham.

To paraphrase Tom Clancy;

If she had ‘em, they’d be big brass ones.

This gal has ovaries bigger than most guys’ tackle.
One can only hope that Senator Graham frequently finds himself being addressed
as “jackass” as a reminder of this delightful woman’s eloquent tirade.

The money quote:

If you want to pick a fight, sir. You go right ahead
but understand that if you pick a fight with me the only way it ends is with you
sobbing in the men’s room.

This woman is a national treasure. I hope there is
some way of inviting her to publish any essays she writes here at Gates of
Vienna.

Blogger said…

In psychology there is a technique called “flooding”
where the person or group is exposed to their “irrational fear“, in this case
seeing a Koran burnt, in frequency and intensity.

Flooding is a psychotherapeutic method for overcoming
phobias. In order to demonstrate the irrationality of the fear a psychologist
would put a person in a situation where they would face their phobia at its
worst.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F&#8230;

I believe that this is what Jones, and now this lady,
and the 1000s of others on youtube. are trying to do, but he just doesn’t have
the terminology. Unfortunately, only being exposed to the “phobia” (Koran
burning) once or twice, can actually “increase” the phobic reaction. So, the
best thing we can do for muslims right now is to “flood” the world with Koran
burning to rid them of this ridiculous and irrational fear.

HRW said… 4

“One can only hope that Senator Graham frequently
finds himself being addressed as “jackass” as a reminder of this delightful
woman’s eloquent tirade.” -Zenster

Ditto that. I’ve sent this out to everyone in my e-box
and expect circulation will rapidly multiply – exponentially. Graham’s stupidity
will haunt him for the rest of his life.

Grateful Libyan ‘refugees’ show gratitude to their
Italian hosts for the hospitality

CNN-US Libya could get bloodier

New Trends in Arabic Anti-semitism.

They riot, kill and burn people when a qur’an gets
burned. One unholy book that is not worthy to be fed to pigs. This is how islam
and many in the muslim world ALWAYS react to something that offends them. What
does NOT offend islam? Do we see Christians and Jews beheading or burning people
when a Bible or Torah gets burned or destroyed? Is there an outcry from the
global community about this? No way, no how, hardly ever.

New Trends in
Arabic Anti-semitism from Henrik
Clausen on Vimeo.

This MEMRI production shows examples of anti-semitism
in modern-day Arab media, including using original national socialist footage to
justify Islamic resentment against Jews.

Originally presented to the UN Human Rights
Commission, Geneva, September 28th 2010.

Note: MEMRI is doing an outstanding job at documenting
racism in the Middle East. Please support them if you can.

0
Comments – Share Yours!
Apr 5, 2011

Palestinian
‘garbage’ truck

Posted by PatriotUSA at 2:21
AM

——————————————————————————————————————–
In this photo:
CAPTURED PALESTINIAN GARBAGE TRUCK

The truck is set up to fire 9
Kasem rockets and then drive off innocently. The note pasted on the drivers door
says In case of traffic violations, please contact The Palestinian Authority.The
Israelis have evidence of ambulances and emergency vehicles set up the same way.
So this is where our $billions of emergency money goes instead of food and
medicine for the “Poor Palestinians”

Courtesy of Max Sprague

1
Comments – Share Yours!
Apr 4, 2011

Syrian
Wild Ass sighted

Posted by PatriotUSA at 2:05
AM

I stole
this from Monkey In The
Middle.

*******************************************************************************************

Syrian Wild Ass
sighted

The Syrian
Wild Ass (Pictured Above) has been considered extinct since 1927. Yet in recent
days a male of the species has been sighted in Syria.

From
Wikipedia:

The
Syrian Wild Ass (Equus hemionus hemippus) is an extinct subspecies of Equus
hemionus that ranged across Syria, Jordan and Iraq.

Syrian Wild or Stupid Ass

Syrian
Wild Ass
The Syrian Wild Ass was the
smallest form of Equidae and could not be domesticated. Its coloring changed
with the seasons – a tawny olive coat for the summer months and pale sandy
yellow for the winter.

It is believed
this is the animal described as the “wild ass” in several books of the Old
Testament, including Job, Psalms, Sirach and Jeremiah. European travelers in the
Middle East during the 15th and 16th centuries reported seeing large herds.
However, its numbers began to drop precipitously during the 18th and 19th
century due to overhunting, and its existence was further imperiled by the
regional upheaval of World War I. The last known wild specimen was fatally shot
in 1927 at Al Ghams near the Azraq oasis in Jordan, and the last captive
specimen died the same year at the Vienna Zoo.

Scientists are amazed at the fortitude of the specimen. It
is amazing that this Ass has been able to survive the turmoil that the specimen
has been subjected to.

What is really
strange is that the Syrian Wild Ass has been seen being protected by the
American Jackass.

AMERICAN JACK ASS or Traitorous Comminazius

Thanks to Findalis from Monkey In the Middle!!

2
Comments – Share Yours!

Limited
posting(in case you had not noticed)

Posted by PatriotUSA at 1:32
AM

We are down
to one computer again and with three students in the house I must defer to
letting them use the computer for school. Just the way it goes. No worries as
there was not an attack or viruses issue. We got a new computer about nine
months ago and about every two or three months it blue screens for no apparent
reason. Our local geeks are besides themselves and may be ready to shoot the
computer. My fault as I introduced them to the world of guns and what they can
do to computers, figures! They are going to build us a new one if need be and it
is under warranty for three more years. Never had this problem before as they
have built us two others that have been great.

I will post what
I can but with it may be sparse for a few more days.

I truly do hate computers, cell phones, kindles, i-pads, I
hate them all.

0
Comments – Share Yours!

The
Olive Tree Initiative at UC-Irvine-The Zionist Organization of America
Letters

Posted by Gary Fouse at 11:07
AM

Gary Fouse
fousesquawk

In the wake of the previously
reported disclosure that UC-Irvine students participating in the Olive Tree
Initiative reportedly met with a top Hamas official in the West Bank in 2009,
the Zionist Organization of America has written two letters expressing outrage.
The first letter is to the Jewish Federation of Orange County. The second is to
UCI Chancellor Michael Drake. Both letters were provided to the Orange County
Independent Task Force on Anti-Semitism, from where they are cross-posted here.
Both letters are blistering. They may be accessed from the below
link.

http://octaskforce.wordpress.com/2011/04/01/zoa-letters-to-oc-jewish-federation-uci-chancellor-drake-expreses-outrage-over-uci-students-meeting-with-hamas-leader/

What can I say? As one who has taught part-time at UCI for
almost 13 years, I can tell you that the ZOA, the Orange County Independent Task
Force on Anti-Semitism, myself and others have been complaining about this crap
for years. All we can do is speak out and inform the public as we stand up not
only for Israel, but more importantly for America and against anti-Semitism. All
we have ever encountered is resistance and denial.

Now, however, the
chickens are coming home to roost, not for anything that our side has done,
rather because of what the other side has done. We knew that eventually, the
truth would come out.

As the cop in Scarface said, “It’s your
tree. You’re sitting in it.”

0
Comments – Share Yours!
Apr 2, 2011

The
Daily Catch Videos for 4-1-2011 And no, you will NOT find any April fools day
stuff here

Posted by PatriotUSA at 11:51
PM

The Daily Catch Videos for
4-1-2011

Anti-Israel
intimidation at University of Quebec. Posting this just as it is up on VT
site.

From Vlad
Tepes.

Thanks to Missglulu who sent me the
original link at David Ouellette’s site for
this. Once again we see the marriage between Islam and leftism giving birth to
the rabid baby of antisemitism, this time in Montreal. Click over to David’s site for the whole
story in French but I will try and update it here in English as I
can.

The group who organized this
particular disruption is ‘Quebec Solidarity’, a group
Amir Khadir is involved with
and may have helped create. The same Amir Khadir who often leads the protests
outside of a Montreal Shoe store because they sell, among other kinds, one brand
of shoe made in Israel. I might add, this shoe store is actually in his own
riding as a member of the Quebec legislature. Talk about
‘representing’.

Herman
Cain on islam and muslims

Our goal
has never been peace with Israel

Britain today thanks to the liberal
left

msa: are
they recruiting for jihad?

CIA in
Libya: From CNN of all networks.

Horror stories of Christian persecution in North
Korea

Multicultural stupidity at its worst. Town tries to
remove ‘Easter’ from Easter Egg Hunt. This is the result of excessive diversity
and mutliculturalism.

http://vp.mgnetwork.net/viewer.swf?u=b79e9470ac47102ea6fd001ec92a4a0d&z=NCN&embed_player=1

1
Comments – Share Yours!
Mar 31, 2011

Geert
Wilders: Time to unmask muhammad

Posted by PatriotUSA at 11:11
PM

Truly an
excellent op/ed by Geert Wilders. Can we imagine Geert Wilders, Allen West and
Herman Cain all together at a conference on islam and sharia law? Better yet,
Allen West and Hermain Cain running together in 2012. As I have mentioned
before; Geert Wilders should run for office here. I bet he has a REAL birth
certificate. With a loser and liar like obama pretending to be potus, why not
Geert Wilders.

*******************************************************************************************

Time to Unmask
Muhammad
By Geert
Wilders

To know why Islam is a
mortal danger one must not only consider the Koran but also the character of
Muhammad, who conceived the Koran and the entirety of Islam.

The Koran is not just a book. Muslims believe that Allah
himself wrote it and that it was dictated to Muhammad in the original version,
the Umm al-Kitab, which is kept on a table in heaven. Consequently one cannot
argue with the contents. Who would dare to disagree with what Allah himself has
written? This explains much of Muhammadan behaviour, from the violence of jihad
to the hatred and persecution of Jews, Christians and other non-Muslims and
apostates. What we in the West regard as abnormal, is perfectly normal for
Islam.

A second insuperable problem
with Islam is the figure of Muhammad. He is not just anyone. He is al-insan
al-kamil, the perfect man. To become a Muslim one must pronounce the Shahada
(the Muslim creed). By pronouncing the Shahada one testifies that there is no
god that can be worshipped except Allah, and one testifies that Muhammad is his
servant and messenger.

The Koran, and
hence Allah, lays down that Muhammad’s life must be imitated. The consequences
of this are horrendous and can be witnessed on a daily
basis.

There has been much analysis of
Muhammad’s mental sanity. In spite of all the available research, it is rarely
mentioned or debated. It is a taboo to discuss the true nature of the man whom
one and a half billion Muslims around the world regard as a holy prophet and
example to be followed. That taboo must be breached in the West, and here in the
Netherlands.

Ali Sina is an Iranian
ex-Muslim who established the organisation for apostates of Islam Faith Freedom
International. In his latest book he posits that Muhammad is a narcissist, a
paedophile, a mass murderer, a terrorist, a misogynist, a lecher, a cult leader,
a madman, a rapist, a torturer, an assassin and a looter. Sina has offered
50,000 dollars for the one who can prove otherwise. Nobody has claimed the
reward as yet. And no wonder, as the description is based on the Islamic texts
themselves, such as the hadiths, the descriptions of Muhammad’s life from
testimonies of contemporaries.

The
historical Muhammad was the savage leader of a gang of robbers from Medina.
Without scruples they looted, raped and murdered. The sources describe orgies of
savagery where hundreds of people’s throats were cut, hands and feet chopped
off, eyes cut out, entire tribes massacred. An example is the extinction of the
Jewish Kurayza tribe in Medina in 627. One of those who chopped off their heads
was Muhammad. The women and children were sold as slaves. Confronted with the
lunacy of Islamic terrorists today, it is not hard to find out where the lunacy
comes from.

In Vienna the women’s
rights activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was recently sentenced to paying a
fine for insulting a religion by calling Muhammad a paedophile. However, that is
the truth. Numerous hadiths contain testimonies by Muhammad’s favourite wife,
the child wife Aisha. Aisha literally says: “The prophet married me when I was
six years old, and had intercourse with me when I was nine.”

According to the historian Theophanes (752-817) Muhammad
was an epileptic. Epileptic crises are sometimes accompanied by hallucinations,
perspiration form the forehead and foaming at the mouth, the very symptoms which
Muhammad displayed during his visions.

In his book “The other Muhammad” (1992) the Flemish
psychologist dr. Herman Somers concludes that in his forties the “prophet” began
to suffer from acromegaly, a condition caused by a tumor in the pituitary gland,
a small organ that is situated just below the brain. When the tumor in the
pituitary gland causes too much pressure in the brain, people start to see and
hear things that are not there. Somers’s psychopathological diagnosis of
Muhammad’s condition is: organic hallucinatory affliction with paranoid
characteristics.

The German medical
historian Armin Geus speaks of a paranoid hallucinatory schizophrenia. A similar
analysis can be found in the book “The Medical Case of Muhammad” by the
physician Dede Korkut.

In his book
“Psychology of Mohammed: Inside the Brain of a Prophet” Dr. Masud Ansari calls
Muhammad “the perfect personification of a psychopath in power.” Muhammad had a
unhinged paranoid personality with an inferiority complex and megalomaniac
tendencies. In his forties he starts having visions that lead him to believe he
has a cosmic mission, and there is no stopping him.

The truth is not always pleasant or politically correct. On
the basis of the research referred to above it can be argued that the Islamic
creed obliges one and a half billion people around the world, including the one
million living in the Netherlands, to take Muhammad as their example. There is
no turning back once one has become a Muslim. For even though article 18 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that every person has the right to
“change his religion or belief,” in Islam there is a death penalty for leaving
the faith.

Anyone who voices criticism
of Islam and Muhammad is in grave personal danger — as I have experienced. And
whoever attempts to escape from the influence of Islam and Muhammad risks death.
We cannot continue to accept this state of affairs. A public debate about the
true nature and character of Muhammad can provide insight and support to Muslims
all over the world who wish to leave Islam.

Apostates are heroes and more than ever they deserve the
support of freedom loving people all over the world. Party politics should not
be at play in this matter. It is time for us to help these people by exposing
Muhammad.

Geert Wilders is an
MP in the Netherlands. He is the Chairman of the Party for Freedom (PVV). This
article was published in the Dutch weekly magazine “HP/De Tijd” of March 30,
2011.

From Gates Of Vienna